Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 19 + 11 road tests and 3,359 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
S Fit EQ+ is ahead, 73–68
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 78 · 19 tests Owners 56 · 3,359 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (wet braking)
“Tire preferences? My MK8 has a little over 18,000 miles now and the stock tires look like they’ve already gone to sh*t? Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 aren’t as good as they advertise? What do you recommend for tires?”
Tests 66 · 11 tests Owners 80 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test (noise)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | S Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / 10 tests | 86 | 80 |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 85 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–2 | 95% | 94% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 99% | 99% |
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 85.5 + 40% × 60 = 75
S Fit EQ+: 60% × 79.7 + 40% × 85.2 = 82
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | S Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / 11 tests | 90 | 74 |
| Reviews found online | 68 | 79 |
| Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 96% | 96% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–0 | 97% | 87% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 97% | 92% |
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 90.2 + 40% × 67.5 = 81
S Fit EQ+: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 78.5 = 76
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | S Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 2 tests | 65 | 66 |
| Reviews found online | 55 | 78 |
Ventus S1 evo3: 40% × 64.7 + 60% × 55.4 = 59
S Fit EQ+: 40% × 66 + 60% × 77.8 = 73
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | S Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 5 tests | 77 | 77 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 98% | 100% |
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 73
S Fit EQ+: 60% × 77.4 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 73
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus S1 evo3 or S Fit EQ+. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | S Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 5 tests | 61 | 42 |
| Reviews found online | 40 | 76 |
| Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 58% | 62% |
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 60.7 + 40% × 40.4 = 53
S Fit EQ+: 60% × 42.1 + 40% × 76.1 = 56
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | S Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 58 | 84 |
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | S Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 6 tests | 68 | 73 |
| Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 88% | 93% |
| Category | Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 | Laufenn S Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 73 |
| Dry | 75 | 82 |
| Wet | 81 | 76 |
| Comfort | 59 | 73 |
| Noise | 73 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 56 |
| Handling (owners) | 58 | 84 |
| Efficiency | 68 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ventus S1 evo3
S Fit EQ+
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 3 tests that ran both, Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 finished ahead 3 times and Laufenn S Fit EQ+ 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | Ventus S1 evo3 | S Fit EQ+ | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 95% | 94% | +0.8 | 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 225/45 R18 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% | 99% | +0.1 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 60% #8/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test | 96% #3/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 87% #6/7 · 2024 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test | 77% #20/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 96% | 96% | +0.2 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 97% | 87% | +9.9 | 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 225/45 R18 |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 98% #5/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test | 91% #8/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 97% | 92% | +4.2 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 100% #2/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test | 50% #7/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 98% | 100% | −1.3 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 58% | 62% | −4.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 88% | 93% | −5.7 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 68% | 67% | +0.8 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #13/20 | #9/20 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Value | Cost | 70% | 74% | −4.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #1/48 | #26/48 | – | 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 225/45 R18 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment toward the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3 is mixed, with users frequently praising its strong dry and wet grip, comfort, and competitive pricing. However, notable drawbacks include relatively fast tread wear, reports of increasing road noise over time, and mixed experiences with OEM specs versus premium competitors like Michelin.
“My Hankook only lasted 15,000km. no drift or track and only 5-10 launch control. Noise was a bit high compared to my DWS06 +, but they had really good grip.”
“Which tire should I choose? I’m currently looking for new summer tires, but this time I’m finding it surprisingly difficult to choose. My previous set were Bridgestone T005s, which honestly didn’t impress me much. On my earlier car I’ve driven on Michelin PS4S, Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3, and Pirelli (don’t remember the exact model). The Michelins were by far my favorite — excellent grip and overall a fantastic tire. The Hankooks were above average and perfectly fine, but the Pirellis were a big disappointment. This time I’m considering the following three options: • Michelin Pilot Sport 5 • Continental SportContact 7 • Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 If I hadn’t done any research, I would have gone for the Michelins without hesitation. However, after digging a bit deeper, I added the Continentals as a strong competitor, and the Kumhos because they’re significantly cheaper while still getting quite positive reviews. I drive a Cupra Formentor 2.0 AWD with around 430 hp. I never take the car to the track, but I do enjoy sporty driving and quick launches at traffic lights. Now I’m finding the final decision harder than expected. Taking both price and performance into account, which of these three would you recommend? Read more”
“You will love the Ventus S1 EVO3's, I purchased a set back in May 2020 for $473 delivered. In your climate driving at Texas speeds (75-85) efficiency is gonna be about 270-295 Wh/m. I just ordered a set of the iON EVO AS to try out as I have a need for snow use but not bad enough for snow tires.”
Based on 33 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 | B · Laufenn S Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 110 | 74 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 22″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Sizes in common | 30 | 30 |
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Laufenn S Fit EQ+
Winner: Laufenn S Fit EQ+ — better handling, comfort and dry. Pick the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 if wet matters most to you.
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ scores 84 vs 58 on handling.
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ scores 73 vs 59 on comfort.
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ scores 82 vs 75 on dry.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 81 vs 76 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 81 vs 76 on our wet score.
Laufenn S Fit EQ+, 82 vs 75 on our dry score.
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 73 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Laufenn S Fit EQ+, 73 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Laufenn S Fit EQ+, 56 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
Laufenn S Fit EQ+, 73 vs 68 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
