Tests 66 · 11 tests Owners 80 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test (noise)
Head-to-head
Updated
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ vs Continental SportContact 7 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 11 + 22 road tests and 11 + 1,605 owner reviews. How we score
SportContact 7 is ahead, 83–73
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 84 · 22 tests Owners 81 · 1,605 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“On my 2nd set. Got decent mileage from them. 15k miles from the first set of rears and i've 11k on the 2nd set with 4.5mm still left on them.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
82
Dry
SportContact 7 +1597Why this score
Source S Fit EQ+ SportContact 7 Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 21 tests 80 100 Reviews found online 85 92 S Fit EQ+: 60% × 79.7 + 40% × 85.2 = 82
SportContact 7: 60% × 99.6 + 40% × 92 = 97
-
76
Wet
SportContact 7 +1894Why this score
Source S Fit EQ+ SportContact 7 Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 22 tests 74 96 Reviews found online 79 90 S Fit EQ+: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 78.5 = 76
SportContact 7: 60% × 96.3 + 40% × 90 = 94
-
73
Comfort
S Fit EQ+ +568Why this score
Source S Fit EQ+ SportContact 7 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 5 tests 66 56 Reviews found online 78 76 S Fit EQ+: 40% × 66 + 60% × 77.8 = 73
SportContact 7: 40% × 56.4 + 60% × 75.9 = 68
-
73
Noise
S Fit EQ+ +1162Why this score
Source S Fit EQ+ SportContact 7 Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 19 tests 77 59 Reviews found online ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) S Fit EQ+: 60% × 77.4 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 73
SportContact 7: 60% × 59.1 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 62
No owner ratings of noise for S Fit EQ+ or SportContact 7. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
56
Treadwear
SportContact 7 +1268Why this score
Source S Fit EQ+ SportContact 7 Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 1 tests 42 72 Reviews found online 76 61 S Fit EQ+: 60% × 42.1 + 40% × 76.1 = 56
SportContact 7: 60% × 72.1 + 40% × 61.3 = 68
-
84
Handling (owners)
SportContact 7 +589Why this score
Source S Fit EQ+ SportContact 7 Reviews found online 84 89 -
73
Efficiency
S Fit EQ+ +172Why this score
Source S Fit EQ+ SportContact 7 Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 21 tests 73 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn S Fit EQ+ | Continental SportContact 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 83 |
| Dry | 82 | 97 |
| Wet | 76 | 94 |
| Comfort | 73 | 68 |
| Noise | 73 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 68 |
| Handling (owners) | 84 | 89 |
| Efficiency | 73 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
73
/ 100
S Fit EQ+
83
/ 100
SportContact 7
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | S Fit EQ+ | SportContact 7 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 93% #8/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #6/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 99% #2/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 96% #3/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 77% #20/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 87% #3/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 96% #9/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 98% #3/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 81% #10/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking (concrete) | Wet | 90% #21/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 91% #8/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 94% #9/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 50% #7/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 92% #2/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 100% #1/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 100% #3/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Abrasion | Treadwear | 73% #7/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 69% #4/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wear | Treadwear | 73% #7/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 58% #9/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Fuel Consumption | Efficiency | 95% #40/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 96% #6/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 88% #5/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 99% #2/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 73% #2/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test | 62% #11/13 · 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Value | Cost | 92% #2/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 33% #15/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #9/10 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | #2/10 2026 ACE Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A S Fit EQ+
Pros
- Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
- Strong dry and wet road grip with stable handling
- Good fuel economy and low rolling resistance
Cons
- Increased road noise reported by some users
- Stiffer ride quality or firmness in colder conditions (below 10°C)
- Concerns regarding sidewall stiffness and occasional manufacturing flaws (e.g., a hump in one tire)
Tire B SportContact 7
Pros
- Phenomenal wet and dry grip with high cornering limits
- Precise steering response and excellent road feedback
- Strong braking performance and high stability at speed
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear, especially with spirited driving or track use
- Stiff sidewalls can contribute to a harsher, bumpier ride
- Elevated road noise reported on certain road surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Laufenn S Fit EQ+
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Continental SportContact 7
Community members widely praise the Continental SportContact 7 for outstanding dry and wet grip, sharp steering precision, and strong value compared to key rivals like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S. However, users frequently highlight faster tread wear, reduced initial tread depth, and occasional issues with road noise and comfort as main drawbacks.
r/i20n
·1 upvote ·2026-04-25
“My experience is as follows: SC7>PS4S's>ASY6>PS5>ASY5>PS4. I've not tried the ASY6 supersports and I think it's fair to say the PS5/4 grip better than ASY5/6, but you get a lot more feel through the goodyears. Sport contact 7 by far the best overall road tyre you can drive without going for a super aggressive tyre or semi slick.”
forums.m3cutters.co.uk
·6 upvotes ·2024-01-29
“On my 2nd set. Got decent mileage from them. 15k miles from the first set of rears and i've 11k on the 2nd set with 4.5mm still left on them.”
r/TyreReviews
·1 upvote ·2026-01-19
“I have the Conti SportContact 7 as summer tires on my 500hp M2 Competition. Brilliant tire, tons of grip and very direct steering, and needs much less time to get up to temp than the 4S the car came on when I got it. I can't speak for the 5 but it's definitely a stiffer tire compound than the SC7 so it will last longer but will take more time to get up to temp and also less grippy.”
Top themes
#exceptional dry grip#wet weather performance#rapid tread wear#michelin ps4s comparison#value and pricing#steering precision feedback#road noise levels
Based on 114 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn S Fit EQ+ | B · Continental SportContact 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 74 | 123 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 18″ – 24″ |
| Tread depth | — | 8 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 240 AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 19 | 19 |
Which one should you actually buy?
73
/ 100
Laufenn S Fit EQ+
83
/ 100
Continental SportContact 7
Winner: Continental SportContact 7 — better wet, dry and treadwear. Pick the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ if noise and comfort matter most to you.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental SportContact 7 scores 94 vs 76 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental SportContact 7 scores 97 vs 82 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Continental SportContact 7 scores 68 vs 56 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ scores 73 vs 62 on noise.
Tire A · Laufenn S Fit EQ+
Tire B · Continental SportContact 7
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
S Fit EQ+ or SportContact 7?
Which is better in the wet, S Fit EQ+ or SportContact 7?
Continental SportContact 7, 94 vs 76 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, S Fit EQ+ or SportContact 7?
Continental SportContact 7, 97 vs 82 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, S Fit EQ+ or SportContact 7?
Laufenn S Fit EQ+, 73 vs 62 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, S Fit EQ+ or SportContact 7?
Laufenn S Fit EQ+, 73 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, S Fit EQ+ or SportContact 7?
Continental SportContact 7, 68 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, S Fit EQ+ or SportContact 7?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 72 on the efficiency score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology