Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 vs Vredestein Ultrac Satin — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 19 + 8 road tests and 3,366 + 45 owner reviews. How we score

Ultrac Satin is ahead, 76–68

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Tire AHankook

Ventus S1 evo3

Summer

± 6

Tests 78 · 19 tests Owners 56 · 3,366 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (wet braking)

“Tire preferences? My MK8 has a little over 18,000 miles now and the stock tires look like they’ve already gone to sh*t? Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 aren’t as good as they advertise? What do you recommend for tires?”

Vredestein Ultrac Satin

Ultrac Satin

Summer

± 8

Tests 70 · 8 tests Owners 85 · 45 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    Ventus S1 evo3 +8
    67
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo3Ultrac Satin
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / 8 tests8654
    Reviews found online6087

    Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 85.5 + 40% × 60 = 75

    Ultrac Satin: 60% × 53.9 + 40% × 87.4 = 67

  2. 81

    Wet

    Ventus S1 evo3 +1
    80
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo3Ultrac Satin
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / 8 tests9076
    Reviews found online6887

    Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 90.2 + 40% × 67.5 = 81

    Ultrac Satin: 60% × 75.7 + 40% × 86.6 = 80

  3. 59

    Comfort

    Ultrac Satin +30
    89
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo3Ultrac Satin
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 3 tests6595
    Reviews found online5684

    Ventus S1 evo3: 40% × 64.7 + 60% × 55.5 = 59

    Ultrac Satin: 40% × 95.5 + 60% × 84.3 = 89

  4. 73

    Noise

    Ultrac Satin +5
    78
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo3Ultrac Satin
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 5 tests7785
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)

    Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 73

    Ultrac Satin: 60% × 85.4 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 78

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus S1 evo3 or Ultrac Satin. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 53

    Treadwear

    Ultrac Satin +21
    74
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo3Ultrac Satin
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 1 tests6170
    Reviews found online4081

    Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 60.7 + 40% × 40.3 = 53

    Ultrac Satin: 60% × 69.8 + 40% × 80.6 = 74

  6. 58

    Handling (owners)

    Ultrac Satin +27
    85
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo3Ultrac Satin
    Reviews found online5885
  7. 68

    Efficiency

    Ultrac Satin +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo3Ultrac Satin
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 5 tests6871
Scores at a glance
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 vs Vredestein Ultrac Satin: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Ventus S1 evo3Vredestein Ultrac Satin
Relative Score 68 76
Dry 75 67
Wet 81 80
Comfort 59 89
Noise 73 78
Treadwear 53 74
Handling (owners) 58 85
Efficiency 68 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

Ventus S1 evo3

± 8

Ultrac Satin

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryVentus S1 evo3Ultrac SatinΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 96% #7/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test 92% #20/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 98% #7/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test 98% #14/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 60% #8/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test 57% #14/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 98% #8/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 94% #6/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test 93% #8/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 98% #5/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test 98% #2/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 100% #2/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test 95% #7/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 80% #3/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test 58% #7/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 100% #2/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test 100% #3/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 100% #1/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test 100% #2/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise (tester's mark) Noise 100% #2/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wear Treadwear 56% #13/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test 71% #8/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 97% #3/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test 79% #9/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 74% #6/13 · 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test 62% #11/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #6/8 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test #6/8 2021 Gute Fahrt Summer Tire Test R18 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ventus S1 evo3

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in wet and dry conditions
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Competitive pricing compared to premium tier-one brands

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly on rear axles or heavy vehicles
  • Soft sidewalls leading to reduced steering feedback and precision
  • Vulnerability to sidewall damage or bubbling from potholes
All owner themes in the Ventus S1 evo3 review

Tire B Ultrac Satin

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and low road noise levels
  • Strong wet-weather grip and resistance to aquaplaning
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to top-tier premium brands

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can cause a 'wobbly' or 'sway' feeling during hard cornering
  • Lack of sharp steering feedback compared to dedicated performance tires
  • Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users noting rapid wear
All owner themes in the Ultrac Satin review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3

Mixed

Community sentiment toward the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3 is mixed, with users frequently praising its strong dry and wet grip, comfort, and competitive pricing. However, notable drawbacks include relatively fast tread wear, reports of increasing road noise over time, and mixed experiences with OEM specs versus premium competitors like Michelin.

vwvortex.com ·1 upvote ·2025-09-20

“My thoughts with the Hankooks on my '25R vs the Bridgestones on my '23R. Hankooks WAY louder but better ride quality & traction. As far as rotating - I rotate at least every two weeks (off before AutoX and on immediately after - I have dedicated AutoX tires ). I don't even pay attention to what position they're in. Zero issues.”

insideevsforum.com ·5 upvotes ·2022-12-20

“For BMW-approved run flat tires, you should see a symbol that has the letters "RSC" in a circle next to the star symbol. (The "RSC" stands for "Run-flat System Component".) I don't see that symbol on the tire pictured, so it isn't a run flat. Hankook's model number for non-run flat S1 evo 3 tires is K127 whereas the run flat variant is K127B, sometimes referred to as the "SUV version". I only know this because of my quest earlier this year for efficient (yet still sporty) 225/45 R17 summer tires for my aftermarket wheels. In this size, the run flat variant actually has a better rating (B) for rolling resistance than the non-run flat (C) per the Euro tyre labels. This is a rare exception, as run flats are usually less efficient. Note that the non-run flat 205/45 R17 S1 evo 3 has an A rating, which is the most efficient. I haven't seen Euro tyre labels for the run flat variant in that size, but it seems unlikely to me they would have an A rating. As such, I would be surprised if MINI installed them at the factory due to the impact to range--unless they had no other option available due to supply chain constraints.”

r/TyreReviews ·7 upvotes ·2026-01-11

“Which tire should I choose? I’m currently looking for new summer tires, but this time I’m finding it surprisingly difficult to choose. My previous set were Bridgestone T005s, which honestly didn’t impress me much. On my earlier car I’ve driven on Michelin PS4S, Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3, and Pirelli (don’t remember the exact model). The Michelins were by far my favorite — excellent grip and overall a fantastic tire. The Hankooks were above average and perfectly fine, but the Pirellis were a big disappointment. This time I’m considering the following three options: • Michelin Pilot Sport 5 • Continental SportContact 7 • Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 If I hadn’t done any research, I would have gone for the Michelins without hesitation. However, after digging a bit deeper, I added the Continentals as a strong competitor, and the Kumhos because they’re significantly cheaper while still getting quite positive reviews. I drive a Cupra Formentor 2.0 AWD with around 430 hp. I never take the car to the track, but I do enjoy sporty driving and quick launches at traffic lights. Now I’m finding the final decision harder than expected. Taking both price and performance into account, which of these three would you recommend? Read more”

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Value for money#Road noise levels#Tread wear and longevity#OEM fitments and EV variants#Run-flat identification confusion#Ride comfort

Based on 33 community posts

Tire B

Vredestein Ultrac Satin

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 B · Vredestein Ultrac Satin
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available11052
Rim diameters17″ – 22″16″ – 20″
Sizes in common2323

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3

Vredestein Ultrac Satin

Winner: Vredestein Ultrac Satin — better comfort, handling and treadwear. Pick the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 if dry matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Vredestein Ultrac Satin scores 89 vs 59 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Vredestein Ultrac Satin scores 85 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Vredestein Ultrac Satin scores 74 vs 53 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 75 vs 67 on dry.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Tire B · Vredestein Ultrac Satin

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ventus S1 evo3 or Ultrac Satin?

Which is better in the wet, Ventus S1 evo3 or Ultrac Satin?

Neither, by our numbers: 81 vs 80 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus S1 evo3 or Ultrac Satin?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 75 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Ventus S1 evo3 or Ultrac Satin?

Vredestein Ultrac Satin, 78 vs 73 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Ventus S1 evo3 or Ultrac Satin?

Vredestein Ultrac Satin, 89 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ventus S1 evo3 or Ultrac Satin?

Vredestein Ultrac Satin, 74 vs 53 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Ventus S1 evo3 or Ultrac Satin?

Vredestein Ultrac Satin, 71 vs 68 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology