Tests 70 · 8 tests Owners 85 · 45 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
Head-to-head
Updated
Vredestein Ultrac Satin vs Continental PremiumContact 6 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 8 + 42 road tests and 45 + 2,358 owner reviews. How we score
PremiumContact 6 leads, 80–76 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 84 · 42 tests Owners 75 · 2,358 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 50 in 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“My continental premium contact 6’s getting to end or ? I am using these for the last 3 years and drove 46K km on them. Treadwear indicator for 3mm is getting very close. Should I rush or let them run for maybe another 5-10K ? Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
Key facts
- In 5 tests that measured dry braking for both, Ultrac Satin won 0 and PremiumContact 6 won 5 (average 91% vs 99% of the best).
- In 5 tests that measured wet braking for both, Ultrac Satin won 0 and PremiumContact 6 won 5 (average 90% vs 98% of the best).
- In 5 tests that measured wet handling for both, Ultrac Satin won 1 and PremiumContact 6 won 4 (average 97% vs 99% of the best).
- In 4 tests that measured dry handling for both, Ultrac Satin won 1 and PremiumContact 6 won 3 (average 98% vs 99% of the best).
-
67
Dry
PremiumContact 6 +1784Why this score
Source Ultrac Satin PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 39 tests 54 88 Reviews found online 87 78 Dry Braking (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 0–5 91% 99% Dry Handling (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 1–3 98% 99% Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 57% 87% Ultrac Satin: 60% × 53.9 + 40% × 86.9 = 67
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 87.7 + 40% × 78 = 84
-
80
Wet
PremiumContact 6 +585Why this score
Source Ultrac Satin PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 40 tests 76 88 Reviews found online 86 80 Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1 100% 94% Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 58% 100% Wet Braking (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 0–5 90% 98% Wet Handling (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 1–4 97% 99% Ultrac Satin: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 86.4 = 80
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 88.4 + 40% × 80.4 = 85
-
–
Snow
No comparison74Why this score
Source Ultrac Satin PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online – 77 PremiumContact 6: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 74
No road tests of snow for PremiumContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
87
Comfort
Ultrac Satin +1275Why this score
Source Ultrac Satin PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 10 tests 92 80 Reviews found online 84 71 Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 100% 88% Ultrac Satin: 40% × 92.3 + 60% × 83.7 = 87
PremiumContact 6: 40% × 80.4 + 60% × 70.8 = 75
-
77
Noise
Ultrac Satin +2255Why this score
Source Ultrac Satin PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 22 tests 85 43 Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) 73 Noise (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1 100% 99% Ultrac Satin: 60% × 84.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 77
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 43.1 + 40% × 72.5 = 55
No owner ratings of noise for Ultrac Satin. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
74
Treadwear
PremiumContact 6 +579Why this score
Source Ultrac Satin PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 7 tests 70 88 Reviews found online 81 65 Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 71% 100% Ultrac Satin: 60% × 69.7 + 40% × 80.7 = 74
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 88.1 + 40% × 65 = 79
-
85
Handling (owners)
Ultrac Satin +877Why this score
Source Ultrac Satin PremiumContact 6 Reviews found online 85 77 -
71
Efficiency
PremiumContact 6 +374Why this score
Source Ultrac Satin PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 25 tests 71 74 Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–2 77% 80%
Scores at a glance
| Category | Vredestein Ultrac Satin | Continental PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 80 |
| Dry | 67 | 84 |
| Wet | 80 | 85 |
| Snow | – | 74 |
| Comfort | 87 | 75 |
| Noise | 77 | 55 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 79 |
| Handling (owners) | 85 | 77 |
| Efficiency | 71 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
76
/ 100
Ultrac Satin
80
/ 100
PremiumContact 6
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 8 tests that ran both, Vredestein Ultrac Satin finished ahead 0 times and Continental PremiumContact 6 8 times.
| Discipline | Category | Ultrac Satin | PremiumContact 6 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 91% | 99% | −8.3 | 0–5 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% | 99% | −0.9 | 1–3 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 57% | 87% | −30.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 100% | 94% | +5.2 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 90% | 98% | −8.2 | 0–5 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 98% #2/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | 97% #8/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 97% | 99% | −2.6 | 1–4 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 58% | 100% | −42.2 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 100% | 88% | +12.5 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Noise | Noise | 100% | 99% | +0.5 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Noise (tester's mark) | Noise | 100% #1/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | 60% #6/8 · 2021 ViBilagare Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wear | Treadwear | 71% | 100% | −28.9 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 77% | 80% | −2.5 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 62% | 49% | +13.3 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Grass Traction | Off-road | 94% #2/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 81% #8/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Gravel Handling | Off-road | 100% #2/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 100% #3/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Gravel Traction | Off-road | 91% #10/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 83% #9/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Mud Traction | Off-road | 92% #4/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 94% #7/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Sand Traction | Off-road | 94% #6/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 94% #6/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/8 | #2/8 | – | 0–8 in 8 shared tests Newest: 2021 Gute Fahrt Summer Tire Test R18 · 245/40R18 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ultrac Satin
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and low road noise levels
- Strong wet-weather grip and resistance to aquaplaning
- High value-for-money proposition compared to top-tier premium brands
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can cause a 'wobbly' or 'sway' feeling during hard cornering
- Lack of sharp steering feedback compared to dedicated performance tires
- Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users noting rapid wear
Tire B PremiumContact 6
Pros
- Exceptional grip and short braking distances on both dry and wet road surfaces
- Precise steering response and predictable handling near the limit
- High level of high-speed stability and driver confidence
Cons
- Faster tread wear and shorter lifespan reported by spirited drivers
- Increased road noise and harshness on coarse or rough asphalt
- Softer sidewalls can result in less immediate turn-in sharpness compared to dedicated ultra-high-performance tires
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Vredestein Ultrac Satin
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Continental PremiumContact 6
The community generally views the Continental PremiumContact 6 favorably, praising its wet grip, braking confidence, and overall capability across a range of cars including EVs and hot hatches. Criticisms are limited to a soft or soggy sidewall feel, high replacement cost on some OE fitments, and moderate longevity (e.g. ~22k km front on a Polestar 2, ~46k km elsewhere). Noise is considered acceptable, and several users prefer it to Michelin alternatives or the newer PC7 predecessor comparisons.
r/TyreReviews
·23 upvotes ·2025-05-25
“My continental premium contact 6’s getting to end or ? I am using these for the last 3 years and drove 46K km on them. Treadwear indicator for 3mm is getting very close. Should I rush or let them run for maybe another 5-10K ? Read more”
r/nzev
·1 upvote ·2026-06-29
“Well having 4 tyres to change on the Polestar 2 at the same time - and the OE spec Continental Premium Contact 6 tyres being $1020 each!!! (wtf are they made from?) I went with Pirelli Dragon Sports - same 99YXL weight rating - higher speed rating. Noise - no difference at all. Efficiency - nothing I can see from a week of driving. The car's trip average kWh/100km hasn't budged. Wear? Well the Contis lasted 22k km on the front and 44k km on the rear so who knows? Couldn't be worse, could it? Traction - same in the dry and I haven't noticed any difference in the wet but haven't been hooning it...Oh - and they were $290 each balanced and fitted.”
z4-forum.com
·2022-09-26
“In the case of summer tyres nope at the part of the market things haven't changed THAT MUCH... But there are now better tyres, smoother, quieter better handling..the Conti Premium Contact 6 on my cars was a noticeable improvement.. Price can be a major variable..not sure how they price out.. Assy 6 and PS5s are both in the same space as the Conti Premium 6.. Again had Assy 5 and it was a very good tyre..the Assy 6 is even better.. Each turn of the design just keeps getting better..the R+Ts are just old designs..things have moved on..BUT NOT THAT MUCH!”
Top themes
#Excellent wet grip#Braking confidence#Soft sidewall comfort#High price#Tread wear longevity#Noise levels#EV fitment experiences#Comparison with Michelin/Pirelli
Based on 17 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Vredestein Ultrac Satin | B · Continental PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 52 | 113 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 8 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 280 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 46 | 46 |
Which one should you actually buy?
76
/ 100
Vredestein Ultrac Satin
80
/ 100
Continental PremiumContact 6
Narrow edge: Continental PremiumContact 6 — better dry, wet and treadwear. Pick the Vredestein Ultrac Satin if noise, comfort and handling matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Vredestein Ultrac Satin scores 77 vs 55 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 84 vs 67 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Vredestein Ultrac Satin scores 87 vs 75 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Vredestein Ultrac Satin scores 85 vs 77 on handling.
Tire A · Vredestein Ultrac Satin
Tire B · Continental PremiumContact 6
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ultrac Satin or PremiumContact 6?
Which is better in the wet, Ultrac Satin or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 85 vs 80 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ultrac Satin or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 84 vs 67 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Ultrac Satin or PremiumContact 6?
Vredestein Ultrac Satin, 77 vs 55 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Ultrac Satin or PremiumContact 6?
Vredestein Ultrac Satin, 87 vs 75 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ultrac Satin or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 79 vs 74 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, Ultrac Satin or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 74 vs 71 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology