Tests 76 · 21 tests Owners 66 · 1,244 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 21 + 8 road tests and 1,244 + 45 owner reviews. How we score
Ultrac Satin leads, 76–72 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 76 · 21 tests Owners 66 · 1,244 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”
Tests 70 · 8 tests Owners 85 · 45 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Ultrac Satin |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 8 tests | 79 | 54 |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 87 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 91% | 82% |
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 79.5 + 40% × 66.4 = 74
Ultrac Satin: 60% × 53.9 + 40% × 86.9 = 67
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Ultrac Satin |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 8 tests | 85 | 76 |
| Reviews found online | 70 | 86 |
| Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 99% | 99% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 87% | 80% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 99% | 97% |
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 84.9 + 40% × 69.5 = 79
Ultrac Satin: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 86.4 = 80
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Ultrac Satin |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 3 tests | 60 | 92 |
| Reviews found online | 62 | 84 |
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 40% × 60 + 60% × 62.3 = 61
Ultrac Satin: 40% × 92.3 + 60% × 83.7 = 87
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Ultrac Satin |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 5 tests | 66 | 85 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 99% |
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 66.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 66
Ultrac Satin: 60% × 84.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 77
No owner ratings of noise for ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Ultrac Satin. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Ultrac Satin |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 1 tests | 72 | 70 |
| Reviews found online | 63 | 81 |
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 72.3 + 40% × 63.2 = 69
Ultrac Satin: 60% × 69.7 + 40% × 80.7 = 74
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Ultrac Satin |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 66 | 85 |
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Ultrac Satin |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 5 tests | 31 | 71 |
| Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 73% | 75% |
| Category | Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Vredestein Ultrac Satin |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 76 |
| Dry | 74 | 67 |
| Wet | 79 | 80 |
| Comfort | 61 | 87 |
| Noise | 66 | 77 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 66 | 85 |
| Efficiency | 31 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Ultrac Satin
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 2 tests that ran both, Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun finished ahead 1 times and Vredestein Ultrac Satin 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Ultrac Satin | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 91% | 82% | +9.6 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 New 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #3/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 98% #14/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 94% #3/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 57% #14/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 99% | 99% | +0.3 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 New 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 87% | 80% | +6.8 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 New 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 98% #4/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test | 98% #2/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 99% | 97% | +2.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 New 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 70% #8/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test | 58% #7/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 93% #5/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 100% #3/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 100% | 99% | +0.8 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 New 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 67% #8/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 71% #8/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 73% | 75% | −1.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 New 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 72% #7/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 62% #11/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Grass Traction | Off-road | 84% #7/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | 94% #2/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Gravel Handling | Off-road | 99% #7/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | 100% #2/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Gravel Traction | Off-road | 82% #10/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | 91% #10/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Mud Traction | Off-road | 88% #7/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | 92% #4/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Sand Traction | Off-road | 95% #2/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | 94% #6/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #7/8 | #6/8 | – | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Gute Fahrt Summer Tire Test R18 · 245/40R18 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.
Based on 5 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | B · Vredestein Ultrac Satin |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 86 | 52 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | 16″ – 20″ |
| Sizes in common | 36 | 36 |
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Vredestein Ultrac Satin
Narrow edge: Vredestein Ultrac Satin — better efficiency, comfort and handling. Pick the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun if dry matters most to you.
Vredestein Ultrac Satin scores 71 vs 31 on efficiency.
Vredestein Ultrac Satin scores 87 vs 61 on comfort.
Vredestein Ultrac Satin scores 85 vs 66 on handling.
Vredestein Ultrac Satin scores 77 vs 66 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Neither, by our numbers: 79 vs 80 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 74 vs 67 on our dry score.
Vredestein Ultrac Satin, 77 vs 66 on our noise score.
Vredestein Ultrac Satin, 87 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Vredestein Ultrac Satin, 74 vs 69 on our treadwear score.
Vredestein Ultrac Satin, 71 vs 31 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology