Tests 72 · 1 test Owners 82 · 22 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 8 in 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test (dry braking)
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Ventus ST vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 21 road tests and 22 + 1,241 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus ST leads, 76–72 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 21 tests Owners 66 · 1,241 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
Ventus ST +174Why this score
Source Ventus ST ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 20 tests 71 79 Reviews found online 82 67 Ventus ST: 60% × 70.6 + 40% × 82.2 = 75
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 79.4 + 40% × 66.7 = 74
-
78
Wet
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +179Why this score
Source Ventus ST ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 20 tests 75 85 Reviews found online 82 70 Ventus ST: 60% × 74.9 + 40% × 82.3 = 78
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 85.5 + 40% × 69.6 = 79
-
76
Comfort
Ventus ST +1462Why this score
Source Ventus ST ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 60 Reviews found online 79 63 Ventus ST: 40% × 70.9 (est.) + 60% × 78.8 = 76
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 40% × 60.5 + 60% × 62.7 = 62
No road tests of comfort for Ventus ST. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Noise
Ventus ST +266Why this score
Source Ventus ST ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 14 tests 69 66 Reviews found online ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Ventus ST: 60% × 69 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 68
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 66 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 66
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus ST or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
77
Treadwear
Ventus ST +869Why this score
Source Ventus ST ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 83 63 Ventus ST: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 83.4 = 77
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 63 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
82
Handling (owners)
Ventus ST +1666Why this score
Source Ventus ST ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Reviews found online 82 66 -
57
Efficiency
Ventus ST +2532Why this score
Source Ventus ST ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 15 tests 57 32
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus ST | Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 72 |
| Dry | 75 | 74 |
| Wet | 78 | 79 |
| Comfort | 76 | 62 |
| Noise | 68 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 77 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 82 | 66 |
| Efficiency | 57 | 32 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
76
/ 100
Ventus ST
72
/ 100
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Ventus ST | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 95% #2/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 99% #2/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #5/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 99% #3/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 98% #2/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 97% #3/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 99% #3/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 93% #4/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% #3/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 98% #4/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 97% #5/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 98% #5/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 81% #8/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 86% #5/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 58% #6/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 72% #7/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Grass Traction | Off-road | 100% #1/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 84% #7/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | – | Different tests |
| Gravel Handling | Off-road | 99% #4/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 99% #7/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Gravel Traction | Off-road | 100% #1/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 82% #10/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Mud Traction | Off-road | 92% #2/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 88% #7/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/8 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | #3/6 2025 Wybór Kierowców Summer Tire Test R16 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ventus ST
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-lasting durability, often doubling the mileage of competing tires
- Significantly reduced road noise and improved ride comfort compared to factory-fitted premium tires
- Strong dry grip and dependable, predictable wet-weather performance
Cons
- Slightly reduced feedback or a skating sensation in heavy standing water/deep puddles
- Occasional reports of increased road noise as the tires approach the end of their tread life
- Availability can sometimes be limited depending on the region and retailer
Tire B ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Pros
- Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
- Strong grip and stability in both wet and dry weather conditions
- Outstanding value for money compared to premium brands
Cons
- Some drivers report higher rolling resistance and slightly increased fuel consumption
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague initial steering response or a less sporty feel during hard cornering
- Occasional complaints of a firmer, harsher ride over bumps depending on vehicle suspension and aspect ratio
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Hankook Ventus ST
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.
Top themes
#wet weather performance#budget friendly options#tire size availability#grip and handling#eco-run efficiency
Based on 5 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus ST | B · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 10 | 86 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 22″ | 14″ – 19″ |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
76
/ 100
Hankook Ventus ST
72
/ 100
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Narrow edge: Hankook Ventus ST — better efficiency, handling and comfort. Where the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Pick tire A
You want lower fuel or energy use
Hankook Ventus ST scores 57 vs 32 on efficiency.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Ventus ST scores 82 vs 66 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Ventus ST scores 76 vs 62 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Ventus ST scores 77 vs 69 on treadwear.
Tire A · Hankook Ventus ST
Tire B · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ventus ST or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?
Which is better in the wet, Ventus ST or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?
Neither, by our numbers: 78 vs 79 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus ST or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 74 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Ventus ST or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 66 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Ventus ST or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?
Hankook Ventus ST, 76 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ventus ST or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?
Hankook Ventus ST, 77 vs 69 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, Ventus ST or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?
Hankook Ventus ST, 57 vs 32 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology