Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 121 reviews
Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 vs Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 121 + 655 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport A/S 3+ is ahead, 72–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 72 · 655 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“Just had these Pilot Sport A/S 3+ installed to replace OEM Dunlops”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
60
Dry
Pilot Sport A/S 3+ +1575Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo K110 Pilot Sport A/S 3+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 56 79 Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 55.9 = 60
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 78.6 = 75
No road tests of dry for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
60
Wet
Pilot Sport A/S 3+ +1979Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo K110 Pilot Sport A/S 3+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 77 (est.) Reviews found online 56 82 Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.7 = 60
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 77 (est.) + 40% × 82.1 = 79
No road tests of wet for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
49
Snow
Pilot Sport A/S 3+ +1463Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo K110 Pilot Sport A/S 3+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 36 58 Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 57.6 (est.) + 40% × 35.6 = 49
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 57.9 = 63
No road tests of snow for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
60
Comfort
Pilot Sport A/S 3+ +565Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo K110 Pilot Sport A/S 3+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 56 63 Ventus V12 evo K110: 40% × 66.7 (est.) + 60% × 56.1 = 60
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 62.8 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Ventus V12 evo K110 or Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo K110 Pilot Sport A/S 3+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 52 – Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 61
No road tests of noise for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
57
Treadwear
Pilot Sport A/S 3+ +1370Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo K110 Pilot Sport A/S 3+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 51 66 Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.8 = 57
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 72.5 + 40% × 66.1 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
63
Handling (owners)
Pilot Sport A/S 3+ +770Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo K110 Pilot Sport A/S 3+ Reviews found online 63 70
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 | Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 72 |
| Dry | 60 | 75 |
| Wet | 60 | 79 |
| Snow | 49 | 63 |
| Comfort | 60 | 65 |
| Noise | 61 | – |
| Treadwear | 57 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 63 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ventus V12 evo K110
Pilot Sport A/S 3+
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Ventus V12 evo K110 | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #5/9 2013 Auto Review Performance Summer Tyre Test | #2/19 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ventus V12 evo K110
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium brand alternatives
- Strong, confident dry grip and handling performance
- Low road noise and high comfort levels
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to reduced steering feedback and a squirmy feel
- Faster-than-average tread wear
- Subpar wet weather traction and increased risk of aquaplaning as tread wears down
Tire B Pilot Sport A/S 3+
Pros
- Exceptional grip and cornering stability in both dry and wet conditions
- Crisp, highly responsive steering and handling feel
- Substantial upgrade in performance and wet weather confidence compared to OEM tires
Cons
- Significantly faster tread wear than expected, often failing to reach the mileage warranty
- High levels of road noise, buzzing, and droning that increase noticeably as the tread wears down
- Stiff sidewalls leading to a harsher, less comfortable ride over bumps and road imperfections
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+
Community members widely praise the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ for its dry handling, wet grip, and substantial improvement in ride comfort over stock tires. However, several users express reservations about its poor traction in genuine snow conditions and note that road noise can become prominent as the tread wears. It is frequently compared against competitors like the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 as well as its successor, the Pilot Sport All Season 4.
“Have had excellent luck with Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+. Great wet traction, rides nice, good life, super dry handling etc. Those would be my top pick.”
“Pilot Sport A/S 3+ Tires just installed Just got the tires on this morning with an alignment and proper balancing. Holy cow, night and day difference from the original Bridgestones on the car. Car handles so much better. It honestly makes me feel like I just bought a new car. If you have any questions or are considering getting them, feel free to ask!”
“Quote: Originally Posted by pqn628 I had the OEM Bridgestone Potenza with at least 6/9 thread left on the tires and got rid of them because I didnt like how hard they ride. I ended up getting Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ All Season (245/35/19 and 275/35/19) and its a completely different car now. It rides much smoother and quieter than the Bridgestones. I got them at costco for around 950 installed. They are running an instant 70 dollar rebate on 4 Michelin and 1 penny install per tire. Make sure you do a wheel alignment, Costco nationwide does not do alignments for some dumb reason.”
Based on 47 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 | B · Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 280 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ — better wet, dry and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ scores 79 vs 60 on wet.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ scores 75 vs 60 on dry.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ scores 63 vs 49 on snow.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ scores 70 vs 57 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ventus V12 evo K110 or Pilot Sport A/S 3+?
Which is better in the wet, Ventus V12 evo K110 or Pilot Sport A/S 3+?
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+, 79 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus V12 evo K110 or Pilot Sport A/S 3+?
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+, 75 vs 60 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Ventus V12 evo K110 or Pilot Sport A/S 3+?
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+, 63 vs 49 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Ventus V12 evo K110 or Pilot Sport A/S 3+?
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+, 65 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ventus V12 evo K110 or Pilot Sport A/S 3+?
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+, 70 vs 57 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology