Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 37 + 0 road tests and 10,323 + 121 owner reviews. How we score
Turanza T005 is ahead, 71–60
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 76 · 37 tests Owners 62 · 10,323 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“Are these needing replacement? - Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT (Run Flat) BMW G20 Not sure if I should be replacing these yet they seem close to the wear bar, rather be safe than sorry and to ask here especially with Uk/Irish weather 😅 Read more”
Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 121 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Turanza T005 | Ventus V12 evo K110 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 34 / – tests | 85 | ≈ 63 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 63 | 56 |
Turanza T005: 60% × 84.6 + 40% × 62.9 = 76
Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 55.9 = 60
No road tests of dry for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Turanza T005 | Ventus V12 evo K110 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 35 / – tests | 86 | ≈ 62 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 70 | 56 |
Turanza T005: 60% × 85.9 + 40% × 69.8 = 79
Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.7 = 60
No road tests of wet for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Turanza T005 | Ventus V12 evo K110 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | ≈ 58 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | – | 36 |
Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 57.6 (est.) + 40% × 35.6 = 49
No road tests of snow for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | Turanza T005 | Ventus V12 evo K110 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests | 73 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 61 | 56 |
Turanza T005: 40% × 72.6 + 60% × 60.5 = 65
Ventus V12 evo K110: 40% × 66.7 (est.) + 60% × 56.1 = 60
No road tests of comfort for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Turanza T005 | Ventus V12 evo K110 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 25 / – tests | 36 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 67 (est.) | 52 |
Turanza T005: 60% × 35.8 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 48
Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 61
No owner ratings of noise for Turanza T005. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
No road tests of noise for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Turanza T005 | Ventus V12 evo K110 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests | 71 | ≈ 61 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 52 | 51 |
Turanza T005: 60% × 71.4 + 40% × 52.2 = 64
Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.8 = 57
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Turanza T005 | Ventus V12 evo K110 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 64 | 63 |
| Source | Turanza T005 | Ventus V12 evo K110 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 25 / – tests | 100 | – |
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza T005 | Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 60 |
| Dry | 76 | 60 |
| Wet | 79 | 60 |
| Snow | – | 49 |
| Comfort | 65 | 60 |
| Noise | 48 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 57 |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | 63 |
| Efficiency | 100 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Turanza T005
Ventus V12 evo K110
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Turanza T005 | Ventus V12 evo K110 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #5/6 2025 Wybór Kierowców Summer Tire Test R16 | #5/9 2013 Auto Review Performance Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community opinions on the Bridgestone Turanza T005 are divided, with many drivers praising its wet-weather grip and highway usability. Conversely, numerous owners report significant concerns regarding loud road noise, rough ride comfort, rapid wear, and premature sidewall cracking or dry rot.
“I have a ford Fiesta with the Turanza T005s. I bought them in October last year for around 80 a corner and will probably replace them with the same when needed. I drive motorways mostly and have used them in some terrible rain and they are fantastic in the wet. Obviously not winter tyres but till fantastic. They give me much more confidence to drive spritely which is great.”
“Yup, I’m using them. Fantastic tyre and stick like glue in the wet.”
“Tyre options? Hey, My 2025 VZ come with stock Brigestone Turanza T005 tyres and after 2 summer seasons I can confidently say they are very loud and the comfort level is not where it should be, specifically on rough concrete at highway speeds. On good (accoustic) asphalt, the interior noise is acceptable. Furthermore, the handling and road feel is also not particuraly great. I want to replace my tyres for these reasons but I have not yet decided what tyre to buy. Does anyone have any recommendations based on experience? (the noise levels have clearly improved) Read more”
Based on 33 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza T005 | B · Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 140 | — |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 340 A A | 280 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110
Winner: Bridgestone Turanza T005 — better wet, dry and treadwear. Pick the Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 if noise matters most to you.
Bridgestone Turanza T005 scores 79 vs 60 on wet.
Bridgestone Turanza T005 scores 76 vs 60 on dry.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 scores 61 vs 48 on noise.
Bridgestone Turanza T005 scores 64 vs 57 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Bridgestone Turanza T005, 79 vs 60 on our wet score.
Bridgestone Turanza T005, 76 vs 60 on our dry score.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110, 61 vs 48 on our noise score.
Bridgestone Turanza T005, 65 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Bridgestone Turanza T005, 64 vs 57 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
