tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 vs Kumho Ecsta V720 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Ventus V12 evo2 is ahead, 68–62

Check price on Amazon · Ventus V12 evo2 or Ecsta V720 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire BKumho

Ecsta V720

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 11 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    Level
    71
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo2Ecsta V720
    Professional tests (TWG score)71–
    Reviews found online7173
  2. 71

    Wet

    Ventus V12 evo2 +13
    58
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo2Ecsta V720
    Professional tests (TWG score)70–
    Reviews found online7254
  3. 68

    Comfort

    Ventus V12 evo2 +11
    57
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo2Ecsta V720
    Reviews found online6645
  4. 73

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo2Ecsta V720
    Professional tests (TWG score)77–
  5. 62

    Treadwear

    Ventus V12 evo2 +10
    52
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo2Ecsta V720
    Reviews found online6043
  6. 69

    Handling

    Ecsta V720 +4
    73
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo2Ecsta V720
    Reviews found online6973
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Ventus V12 evo2Kumho Ecsta V720
Relative Score 68 62
Dry 71 71
Wet 71 58
Comfort 68 57
Noise 73 –
Treadwear 62 52
Handling 69 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ventus V12 evo2

Ecsta V720

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ventus V12 evo2

Pros

  • Excellent value and cost-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands
  • Strong, reliable grip in both dry and wet conditions with good aquaplaning resistance
  • Comfortable ride with low initial road noise

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can cause a floaty feel or roll during aggressive cornering and track use
  • Road noise increases noticeably as the tires wear down
  • Treadwear is relatively fast, leading to shorter overall mileage
All owner themes in the Ventus V12 evo2 review

Tire B Ecsta V720

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and traction for high-horsepower vehicles
  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Precise steering feedback and firm sidewall construction

Cons

  • High levels of road noise
  • Rapid tread wear
  • Inconsistent wet weather performance, with some reports of hydroplaning
All owner themes in the Ecsta V720 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 B · Kumho Ecsta V720
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available38—
Rim diameters15″ – 21″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2

Kumho Ecsta V720

Winner: Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — better wet, comfort and treadwear. Pick the Kumho Ecsta V720 if handling matters most to you.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 71 vs 58 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 68 vs 57 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 62 vs 52 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecsta V720 scores 73 vs 69 on handling.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta V720
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

68

Leads

Ventus V12 evo2

Amazon