Tests 71 · 1 test Owners 67 · 93 reviews
Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 vs Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 93 + 5 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus V12 evo2 leads, 69–67 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 68 · 1 test Owners 67 · 5 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
Ventus V12 evo2 +566Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo2 Solus HS51 Harmony Sports Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 71 65 Reviews found online 71 66 Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 70.5 = 71
Solus HS51 Harmony Sports: 60% × 65.4 + 40% × 65.8 = 66
-
70
Wet
Solus HS51 Harmony Sports +373Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo2 Solus HS51 Harmony Sports Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 69 75 Reviews found online 72 70 Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 69.2 + 40% × 71.8 = 70
Solus HS51 Harmony Sports: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 70.4 = 73
-
67
Comfort
Ventus V12 evo2 +859Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo2 Solus HS51 Harmony Sports Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 51 Reviews found online 66 71 Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67
Solus HS51 Harmony Sports: 60% × 51 + 40% × 70.7 = 59
No road tests of comfort for Ventus V12 evo2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
73
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo2 Solus HS51 Harmony Sports Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 77 – Reviews found online ≈ 67 (est.) – Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 73
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus V12 evo2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
63
Treadwear
Solus HS51 Harmony Sports +366Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo2 Solus HS51 Harmony Sports Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 60 66 Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 60.3 = 63
Solus HS51 Harmony Sports: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus V12 evo2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Solus HS51 Harmony Sports. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
69
Handling (owners)
Ventus V12 evo2 +861Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo2 Solus HS51 Harmony Sports Reviews found online 69 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 | Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 67 |
| Dry | 71 | 66 |
| Wet | 70 | 73 |
| Comfort | 67 | 59 |
| Noise | 73 | – |
| Treadwear | 63 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ventus V12 evo2
Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Ventus V12 evo2 | Solus HS51 Harmony Sports | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 97% #4/5 · 2017 Car and Driver UHP Tyre Test | 91% #9/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 88% #4/5 · 2017 Car and Driver UHP Tyre Test | 95% #5/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 95% #4/5 · 2017 Car and Driver UHP Tyre Test | 99% #4/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #4/5 2017 Car and Driver UHP Tyre Test | #7/10 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ventus V12 evo2
Pros
- Excellent value and cost-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands
- Strong, reliable grip in both dry and wet conditions with good aquaplaning resistance
- Comfortable ride with low initial road noise
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can cause a floaty feel or roll during aggressive cornering and track use
- Road noise increases noticeably as the tires wear down
- Treadwear is relatively fast, leading to shorter overall mileage
Tire B Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
Pros
- High level of ride comfort and low noise levels
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Strong wet weather performance
Cons
- Excessive sidewall softness leading to a 'wobbling' or unstable sensation
- Noticeable decline in grip levels before the tread is fully worn
- Inconsistent handling performance depending on axle placement
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 | B · Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 38 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 21″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
Narrow edge: Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — better comfort, handling and dry. Pick the Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports if wet and treadwear matter most to you. Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 67 vs 59 on comfort.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 69 vs 61 on handling.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 71 vs 66 on dry.
Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports scores 73 vs 70 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ventus V12 evo2 or Solus HS51 Harmony Sports?
Which is better in the wet, Ventus V12 evo2 or Solus HS51 Harmony Sports?
Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports, 73 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus V12 evo2 or Solus HS51 Harmony Sports?
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 71 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Ventus V12 evo2 or Solus HS51 Harmony Sports?
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 67 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ventus V12 evo2 or Solus HS51 Harmony Sports?
Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports, 66 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology