Tests 71 · 1 test Owners 67 · 93 reviews
Toyo Tranpath looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 vs Toyo Tranpath — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 93 + 6 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Ventus V12 evo2 and Tranpath are level at 69.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
Ventus V12 evo2 +269Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo2 Tranpath Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 71 ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 71 70 Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 70.8 = 71
Tranpath: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 69
No road tests of dry for Tranpath. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
71
Wet
Level71Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo2 Tranpath Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 69 ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 73 71 Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 69.2 + 40% × 72.8 = 71
Tranpath: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 71
No road tests of wet for Tranpath. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
66
Comfort
Tranpath +571Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo2 Tranpath Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 65 71 Ventus V12 evo2: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 64.9 = 66
Tranpath: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 71.4 = 71
No road tests of comfort for Ventus V12 evo2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Tranpath. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
73
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo2 Tranpath Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 77 – Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) – Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 77.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 73
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus V12 evo2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
62
Treadwear
Tranpath +365Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo2 Tranpath Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 58 64 Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 58.4 = 62
Tranpath: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus V12 evo2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Tranpath. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
70
Handling (owners)
Ventus V12 evo2 +169Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo2 Tranpath Reviews found online 70 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 | Toyo Tranpath |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 69 |
| Dry | 71 | 69 |
| Wet | 71 | 71 |
| Comfort | 66 | 71 |
| Noise | 73 | – |
| Treadwear | 62 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 70 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ventus V12 evo2
Tranpath
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ventus V12 evo2
Pros
- Excellent value and cost-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands
- Strong, reliable grip in both dry and wet conditions with good aquaplaning resistance
- Comfortable ride with low initial road noise
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can cause a floaty feel or roll during aggressive cornering and track use
- Road noise increases noticeably as the tires wear down
- Treadwear is relatively fast, leading to shorter overall mileage
Tire B Tranpath
Pros
- Reliable dry weather traction
- Consistent grip in cold temperatures
- Solid performance on SUV platforms
Cons
- Disappointing tread life relative to price
- Mediocre wet weather performance
- Poor traction in mud or off-road conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 | B · Toyo Tranpath |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 38 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 21″ | — |
| UTQG | 320 - 380 A - AA A | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
Toyo Tranpath
Too close to call: Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 and Toyo Tranpath are within 2 points overall. Toyo Tranpath is stronger on comfort and treadwear. Toyo Tranpath rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Toyo Tranpath scores 71 vs 66 on comfort.
Toyo Tranpath scores 65 vs 62 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ventus V12 evo2 or Tranpath?
Which is better in the wet, Ventus V12 evo2 or Tranpath?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus V12 evo2 or Tranpath?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Ventus V12 evo2 or Tranpath?
Toyo Tranpath, 71 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ventus V12 evo2 or Tranpath?
Toyo Tranpath, 65 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology