Tests 69 · 1 test Owners 42 · 5 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 19 in 2023 UTAC Large Winter Tire Test R16 (ice traction)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 5 + 8 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429) 57, I Fit Ice 58.
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 69 · 1 test Owners 42 · 5 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 19 in 2023 UTAC Large Winter Tire Test R16 (ice traction)
Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 8 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429) | I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 65 | ≈ 61 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 38 | 52 |
Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429): 60% × 64.8 + 40% × 38.4 = 54
I Fit Ice: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 52.2 = 58
No road tests of dry for I Fit Ice. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429) | I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 65 | ≈ 61 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 44 | 53 |
Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429): 60% × 64.9 + 40% × 44.3 = 57
I Fit Ice: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 53.4 = 58
No road tests of wet for I Fit Ice. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429) | I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 78 | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 48 | 62 |
Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429): 60% × 78 + 40% × 48.3 = 66
I Fit Ice: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 62 = 65
No road tests of snow for I Fit Ice. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429) | I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 62 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 32 | 52 |
Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429): 40% × 62 (est.) + 60% × 32.2 = 44
I Fit Ice: 40% × 65.7 (est.) + 60% × 51.9 = 57
No road tests of comfort for Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429) or I Fit Ice. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429) | I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 62 | – |
| Reviews found online | 30 | – |
Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429): 60% × 62.2 + 40% × 29.8 = 49
| Source | Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429) | I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 59 (est.) | ≈ 57 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 44 | 38 |
Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429): 60% × 58.6 (est.) + 40% × 43.6 = 53
I Fit Ice: 60% × 56.6 (est.) + 40% × 37.9 = 49
No road tests of treadwear for Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429). The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for I Fit Ice. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429) | I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | – | 48 |
| Source | Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429) | I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 74 | – |
| Category | Hankook Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429) | Laufenn I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 57 | 58 |
| Dry | 54 | 58 |
| Wet | 57 | 58 |
| Snow | 66 | 65 |
| Comfort | 44 | 57 |
| Noise | 49 | – |
| Treadwear | 53 | 49 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 48 |
| Efficiency | 74 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429)
I Fit Ice
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429) | I Fit Ice | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/10 2025 UTAC Ivalo Studded Winter Tire Test R16 | #16/17 2020 Consumer Reports North America Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
| Attribute | A · Hankook Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429) | B · Laufenn I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter tire | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 36 | — |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 18″ | — |
| Tread depth | 11.3/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Hankook Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429)
Laufenn I Fit Ice
Too close to call: Hankook Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429) and Laufenn I Fit Ice are within 2 points overall. Hankook Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429) is stronger on treadwear. Laufenn I Fit Ice is stronger on comfort and dry. Hankook Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429) rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Laufenn I Fit Ice rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Laufenn I Fit Ice scores 57 vs 44 on comfort.
Hankook Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429) scores 53 vs 49 on treadwear.
Laufenn I Fit Ice scores 58 vs 54 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Neither, by our numbers: 57 vs 58 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Laufenn I Fit Ice, 58 vs 54 on our dry score.
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Laufenn I Fit Ice, 57 vs 44 on our comfort score.
Hankook Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429), 53 vs 49 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology