Head-to-head Updated

Kleber Krisalp HP3 vs Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 23 + 5 road tests and 37 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

WinterCraft WP52 plus leads, 79–77 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kleber Krisalp HP3
Tire AKleber

Krisalp HP3

Winter

± 5

Tests 76 · 23 tests Owners 79 · 37 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 31 in 2025 Winter Tyre Braking Test - 52 Sets! (snow braking)

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus
± 5

Tests 78 · 5 tests Owners 81 · 6 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 3 tests that measured wet braking for both, Krisalp HP3 won 0 and WinterCraft WP52 plus won 3 (average 88% vs 91% of the best).
  • In 3 tests that measured snow braking for both, Krisalp HP3 won 3 and WinterCraft WP52 plus won 0 (average 100% vs 97% of the best).
  1. 68

    Dry

    WinterCraft WP52 plus +14
    82
    Why this score
    SourceKrisalp HP3WinterCraft WP52 plus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 4 tests6382
    Reviews found online7783
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–292%98%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–298%99%

    Krisalp HP3: 60% × 62.5 + 40% × 76.7 = 68

    WinterCraft WP52 plus: 60% × 81.7 + 40% × 83.2 = 82

  2. 84

    Wet

    WinterCraft WP52 plus +4
    88
    Why this score
    SourceKrisalp HP3WinterCraft WP52 plus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / 5 tests8590
    Reviews found online8287
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–097%86%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0100%97%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–388%91%
    Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–196%96%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–295%97%

    Krisalp HP3: 60% × 85.1 + 40% × 82.3 = 84

    WinterCraft WP52 plus: 60% × 89.5 + 40% × 86.5 = 88

  3. 86

    Snow

    Krisalp HP3 +10
    76
    Why this score
    SourceKrisalp HP3WinterCraft WP52 plus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / 5 tests9275
    Reviews found online7779
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–0100%97%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1100%99%
    Snow Slalom (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–099%98%
    Snow Traction (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0100%95%

    Krisalp HP3: 60% × 91.6 + 40% × 77.1 = 86

    WinterCraft WP52 plus: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 78.8 = 76

  4. 67

    Comfort

    WinterCraft WP52 plus +10
    77
    Why this score
    SourceKrisalp HP3WinterCraft WP52 plus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 2 tests5074
    Reviews found online7979
    Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–184%91%

    Krisalp HP3: 40% × 49.5 + 60% × 79.3 = 67

    WinterCraft WP52 plus: 40% × 73.6 + 60% × 78.9 = 77

  5. 77

    Noise

    Krisalp HP3 +15
    62
    Why this score
    SourceKrisalp HP3WinterCraft WP52 plus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 3 tests8459
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–198%98%

    Krisalp HP3: 60% × 84.4 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 77

    WinterCraft WP52 plus: 60% × 59 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 62

    No owner ratings of noise for Krisalp HP3 or WinterCraft WP52 plus. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 73

    Treadwear

    WinterCraft WP52 plus +1
    74
    Why this score
    SourceKrisalp HP3WinterCraft WP52 plus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 4 tests7074
    Reviews found online7875
    Wear (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–091%88%

    Krisalp HP3: 60% × 69.9 + 40% × 77.8 = 73

    WinterCraft WP52 plus: 60% × 73.5 + 40% × 75.4 = 74

  7. 78

    Handling (owners)

    WinterCraft WP52 plus +5
    83
    Why this score
    SourceKrisalp HP3WinterCraft WP52 plus
    Reviews found online7883
  8. 65

    Efficiency

    Krisalp HP3 +1
    64
    Why this score
    SourceKrisalp HP3WinterCraft WP52 plus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 4 tests6564
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–292%93%
Scores at a glance
Kleber Krisalp HP3 vs Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKleber Krisalp HP3Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus
Relative Score 77 79
Dry 68 82
Wet 84 88
Snow 86 76
Comfort 67 77
Noise 77 62
Treadwear 73 74
Handling (owners) 78 83
Efficiency 65 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Krisalp HP3

± 5

WinterCraft WP52 plus

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 3 tests that ran both, Kleber Krisalp HP3 finished ahead 2 times and Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus 1 times.

DisciplineCategoryKrisalp HP3WinterCraft WP52 plusΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 92% 98% −5.5 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Dry Handling Dry 98% 99% −0.8 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 97% 86% +10.5 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 100% 97% +2.9 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Wet Braking Wet 88% 91% −3.6 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Wet Circle Wet 96% 96% −0.5 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Wet Handling Wet 95% 97% −1.2 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Snow Braking Snow 100% 97% +3.2 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Snow Handling Snow 100% 99% +0.6 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Snow Slalom Snow 99% 98% +1.4 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Snow Traction Snow 100% 95% +4.6 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 84% 91% −7.2 0–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Noise Noise 98% 98% −0.5 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Wear Treadwear 91% 88% +2.4 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 92% 93% −1.2 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #13/20 #8/20 – 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Value Cost 70% 77% −7.1 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Overall Ranking Overall #5/20 #8/20 – 2–1 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Krisalp HP3

Pros

  • Excellent traction and reliability in deep and packed snow
  • Strong performance in wet conditions and resistance to aquaplaning
  • High tread life and durability over multiple seasons

Cons

  • Occasional reports of manufacturing defects causing vibrations
  • Soft sidewall construction leading to a 'boat-like' or disconnected handling feel
  • Increased noise levels developing over time or at specific speeds
All owner themes in the Krisalp HP3 review

Tire B WinterCraft WP52 plus

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip performance rivaling premium tier competitors
  • High level of ride comfort and compliance compared to factory run-flats
  • Remarkably low road noise, often quieter than summer tires

Cons

  • Not recommended for extreme winter conditions where alternative budget brands like Barum might be better suited
  • Slightly less brand prestige compared to tier-one European or Japanese manufacturers
All owner themes in the WinterCraft WP52 plus review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kleber Krisalp HP3 B · Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available75—
Rim diameters14″ – 20″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Kleber Krisalp HP3

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus

Narrow edge: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus — better dry, comfort and wet. Pick the Kleber Krisalp HP3 if noise and snow matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Kleber Krisalp HP3 scores 77 vs 62 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus scores 82 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Kleber Krisalp HP3 scores 86 vs 76 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus scores 77 vs 67 on comfort.

Tire A · Kleber Krisalp HP3
Tire B · Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Krisalp HP3 or WinterCraft WP52 plus?

Which is better in the wet, Krisalp HP3 or WinterCraft WP52 plus?

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus, 88 vs 84 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Krisalp HP3 or WinterCraft WP52 plus?

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus, 82 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Krisalp HP3 or WinterCraft WP52 plus?

Kleber Krisalp HP3, 86 vs 76 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Krisalp HP3 or WinterCraft WP52 plus?

Kleber Krisalp HP3, 77 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Krisalp HP3 or WinterCraft WP52 plus?

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus, 77 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Krisalp HP3 or WinterCraft WP52 plus?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 74 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

Which rolls more easily, Krisalp HP3 or WinterCraft WP52 plus?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 64 on the efficiency score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology