Tests – · none yet Owners 35 · 275 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 275 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
Defender LTX M/S is ahead, 78–47
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 35 · 275 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Tests – · 1 test Owners 82 · 10 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 53 (est.) | ≈ 74 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 32 | 83 |
Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.8 (est.) + 40% × 31.8 = 44
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 74.5 (est.) + 40% × 83.3 = 78
No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 56 (est.) | ≈ 78 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 45 | 84 |
Crugen HP71: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.7 = 52
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 78.2 (est.) + 40% × 84.2 = 81
No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 60 (est.) | ≈ 73 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 42 | 76 |
Crugen HP71: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 41.9 = 53
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 72.7 (est.) + 40% × 76 = 74
No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 63 (est.) | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 33 | 78 |
Crugen HP71: 40% × 62.6 (est.) + 60% × 33.4 = 45
Defender LTX M/S: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 77.6 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71 or Defender LTX M/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 37 | – |
Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 36.7 = 55
No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 49 (est.) | 75 |
| Reviews found online | 18 | 85 |
Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.5 (est.) + 40% × 18.3 = 37
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 85.1 = 79
No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 52 | 80 |
| Category | Kumho Crugen HP71 | Michelin Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 47 | 78 |
| Dry | 44 | 78 |
| Wet | 52 | 81 |
| Snow | 53 | 74 |
| Comfort | 45 | 75 |
| Noise | 55 | – |
| Treadwear | 37 | 79 |
| Handling (owners) | 52 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Crugen HP71
Defender LTX M/S
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Crugen HP71 | Defender LTX M/S | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/9 2021 Teknikens Värld Summer Tire Test R18 | #3/13 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment for the Kumho Crugen HP71 (and its EV variant) is mixed, with owners praising its affordability, comfortable ride, and quiet performance on many vehicles. However, a significant number of drivers report disappointingly rapid tread wear—particularly on heavy electric vehicles—as well as occasional noise on coarse surfaces and internal acoustic foam detachment issues.
“Bought a set of Kumho tires to replace the OE Michelins on the wife's Ford Edge. The Michelins have barely 35K and aren't going to pass the NC safety check. For being a top tier tire they were wildly mediocre. I've has several sets of Kumho and they are better than average and not too expensive. I bought four of these. Anybody have experience with Kumhos? Kumho Crugen HP71 245 /60 R18 105V SL BSW”
“2023 ID4 AWD Pro S Kumho Crugen EV HP71 I replaced the original worn down (and one with a sidewall bump) Pirellis at 33k with the EV version (badges on the sidewall) of the HP71 (direct from dealer). They're more expensive than the non-EV versions and have a lower warranty. So far they're impressive: ride is softer/smoother, quieter, deep treads. Hard to tell if efficiency changed with the winter weather, but we were getting 3mi/kWh on a 34 degree day.”
“That is a crazy good price - The TA91 is low $200s wholesale! (Tire shop pricing). And $279.30 retail. (Tire Rack) Grab them while you can. Sometimes Wal Mart beats any price I can get when they're blowing out a specific tire. FWIW we run the Kumho HP71 EV (OE tire) on our EV9 and it's a super quiet tire. I bought it again for the Spring now that the car is actually aligned and won't burn through them.”
Based on 51 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Kumho Crugen HP71 | B · Michelin Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 63 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9.9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 640 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Kumho Crugen HP71
Michelin Defender LTX M/S
Winner: Michelin Defender LTX M/S — better treadwear, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Defender LTX M/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 79 vs 37 on treadwear.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 78 vs 44 on dry.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 75 vs 45 on comfort.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 81 vs 52 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 81 vs 52 on our wet score.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 78 vs 44 on our dry score.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 74 vs 53 on our snow score.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 75 vs 45 on our comfort score.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 79 vs 37 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology