Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Crugen HP71 vs Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 278 + 8 owner reviews. How we score

Primacy HP Zero Pressure is ahead, 80–46

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire AKumho

Crugen HP71

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 278 reviews

“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 44

    Dry

    Primacy HP Zero Pressure +34
    78
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Primacy HP Zero Pressure
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 53 (est.)≈ 75 (est.)
    Reviews found online3184

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.5 (est.) + 40% × 30.6 = 44

    Primacy HP Zero Pressure: 60% × 74.5 (est.) + 40% × 83.9 = 78

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Primacy HP Zero Pressure. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 51

    Wet

    Primacy HP Zero Pressure +30
    81
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Primacy HP Zero Pressure
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 56 (est.)≈ 78 (est.)
    Reviews found online4484

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 56 (est.) + 40% × 43.8 = 51

    Primacy HP Zero Pressure: 60% × 78.2 (est.) + 40% × 84.3 = 81

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Primacy HP Zero Pressure. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Primacy HP Zero Pressure
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)–
    Reviews found online41–

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 40.9 = 53

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 44

    Comfort

    Primacy HP Zero Pressure +35
    79
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Primacy HP Zero Pressure
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online3284

    Crugen HP71: 40% × 61.3 (est.) + 60% × 32 = 44

    Primacy HP Zero Pressure: 40% × 71.7 (est.) + 60% × 83.8 = 79

    No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Primacy HP Zero Pressure. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 54

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Primacy HP Zero Pressure
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online36–

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.5 = 54

    No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 37

    Treadwear

    Primacy HP Zero Pressure +41
    78
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Primacy HP Zero Pressure
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 49 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online1985

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.4 (est.) + 40% × 18.5 = 37

    Primacy HP Zero Pressure: 60% × 73 (est.) + 40% × 84.8 = 78

    No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Primacy HP Zero Pressure. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 51

    Handling (owners)

    Primacy HP Zero Pressure +33
    84
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Primacy HP Zero Pressure
    Reviews found online5184
Scores at a glance
Kumho Crugen HP71 vs Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Crugen HP71Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure
Relative Score 46 80
Dry 44 78
Wet 51 81
Snow 53 –
Comfort 44 79
Noise 54 –
Treadwear 37 78
Handling (owners) 51 84

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Crugen HP71

± 8

Primacy HP Zero Pressure

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Crugen HP71

Pros

  • Strong value: frequently described as much cheaper than Michelin, Pirelli or Bridgestone alternatives while not feeling like a budget tire.
  • Good wet and heavy-rain traction, with some reports of confident light-snow performance.
  • Quiet, smooth ride reported by many owners, often as an improvement over the stock tires (Bridgestone Dueler, Pirelli, Hankook).

Cons

  • Premature or uneven tread wear is the most common complaint, with reports of tires worn out at roughly 15,000 to 27,000 miles or within 1.5 years, far below the 65,000-mile rating.
  • Road and highway noise, including howling that develops with mileage, reported by several owners.
  • Vibration and difficulty keeping the tires balanced, in some cases even after repeated balancing and rotations.
All owner themes in the Crugen HP71 review

Tire B Primacy HP Zero Pressure

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability, with many users reporting between 20,000 to over 40,000 miles
  • Surprisingly high comfort levels and reduced road noise for a run-flat tire
  • Excellent dry handling and dependable wet grip

Cons

  • High upfront premium price point compared to some alternative brands
  • Slightly slippery feel in wet conditions when pushed hard
  • Handling can feel merely good rather than sporty for aggressive driving
All owner themes in the Primacy HP Zero Pressure review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Crugen HP71

Mixed

Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.

r/Cadillac ·2 upvotes ·2026-09-28

“I have The Kumho Crugen HP71 275/50 R22 111H on my 22 ESV Sport And don’t regret it at all. They are much better than original ones and also a lot cheaper in Walmart.”

r/KiaEV9 ·1 upvote ·2026-09-28

“New Tire Woes: Trouble finding XL Load rating. Any advice? 2026 EV9 LLR with 20k miles in SoCal (3 year lease) and the Kumho Crugen HP71 EV wore very quickly despite alignment checks etc early in the lease. Note that these stock tires are 130V with XL load rasting. Most disconcerting is that despite some modest tread left, I hydroplaned on some sprinkler runoff...so I'm not confident in these tires with the upcoming El Nino. This subreddit seems to love the Michelin CrossClimate2 but they don't come in XL load rating in this size. Neither do Defenders. The two main options are: 1. **Hankook iON evo AS SUV** (OE on some EV9s) - But these are seemingly backordered at multiple tire shops. An online vendor cancelled my order despite showing in stock on the site. 2. **Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season**. **Any advice, and anyone have experience with those Pirellis?**”

r/nissanpathfinder ·1 upvote ·2026-05-31

“2026 Pathfinder Tires: 255/60R18 Kumho Crugen HP71 vs 255/50R20 Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra I think I settled on a configuration that suits our needs but it comes with the upgraded 255/50R20 Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra tires/rims. The 20" wheels look great but I think the 18" Kumho's with the taller side will be better for the sometimes rough roads (potholes, large bumps, torn up city streets) we drive and for lighter towing. I highly doubt the dealer will exchange them for me but first I wanted to ask if I'm just overthinking this or should I try to trade down for the 18s. For reference I'm completely satisfied driving an outback with 225/60R18 Yokohama Avid GT (controlled, planted) and not happy with a highlander with 235/65R18 (too soft, uncontrolled). I get that these are different vehicles, suspensions, center of gravity, but hopefully it gives you a better idea. Thanks Edit: clarification on towing: fiberglass trailer like Scamp/Casita”

Top themes
#Affordability and Value#Ride Comfort and Noise#Tread Wear and Longevity#EV Performance and Efficiency#Durability and Quality Issues

Based on 52 community posts

Tire B

Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HP71 B · Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available63—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—
Tread depth9.9/32″—
UTQG640 A A—
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Crugen HP71

Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure

Winner: Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure — better treadwear, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure scores 78 vs 37 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure scores 79 vs 44 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure scores 78 vs 44 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure scores 84 vs 51 on handling.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire B · Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Crugen HP71 or Primacy HP Zero Pressure?

Which is better in the wet, Crugen HP71 or Primacy HP Zero Pressure?

Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure, 81 vs 51 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HP71 or Primacy HP Zero Pressure?

Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure, 78 vs 44 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Crugen HP71 or Primacy HP Zero Pressure?

Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure, 79 vs 44 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Crugen HP71 or Primacy HP Zero Pressure?

Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure, 78 vs 37 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology