Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 278 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 278 + 8 owner reviews. How we score
Primacy HP Zero Pressure is ahead, 80–46
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 278 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Tests – · none yet Owners 84 · 8 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Primacy HP Zero Pressure |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 53 (est.) | ≈ 75 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 31 | 84 |
Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.5 (est.) + 40% × 30.6 = 44
Primacy HP Zero Pressure: 60% × 74.5 (est.) + 40% × 83.9 = 78
No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Primacy HP Zero Pressure. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Primacy HP Zero Pressure |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 56 (est.) | ≈ 78 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 44 | 84 |
Crugen HP71: 60% × 56 (est.) + 40% × 43.8 = 51
Primacy HP Zero Pressure: 60% × 78.2 (est.) + 40% × 84.3 = 81
No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Primacy HP Zero Pressure. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Primacy HP Zero Pressure |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 61 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 41 | – |
Crugen HP71: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 40.9 = 53
No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Primacy HP Zero Pressure |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 61 (est.) | ≈ 72 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 32 | 84 |
Crugen HP71: 40% × 61.3 (est.) + 60% × 32 = 44
Primacy HP Zero Pressure: 40% × 71.7 (est.) + 60% × 83.8 = 79
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Primacy HP Zero Pressure. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Primacy HP Zero Pressure |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 36 | – |
Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.5 = 54
No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Primacy HP Zero Pressure |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 49 (est.) | ≈ 73 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 19 | 85 |
Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.4 (est.) + 40% × 18.5 = 37
Primacy HP Zero Pressure: 60% × 73 (est.) + 40% × 84.8 = 78
No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Primacy HP Zero Pressure. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Primacy HP Zero Pressure |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 51 | 84 |
| Category | Kumho Crugen HP71 | Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 46 | 80 |
| Dry | 44 | 78 |
| Wet | 51 | 81 |
| Snow | 53 | – |
| Comfort | 44 | 79 |
| Noise | 54 | – |
| Treadwear | 37 | 78 |
| Handling (owners) | 51 | 84 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Crugen HP71
Primacy HP Zero Pressure
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.
“I have The Kumho Crugen HP71 275/50 R22 111H on my 22 ESV Sport And don’t regret it at all. They are much better than original ones and also a lot cheaper in Walmart.”
“New Tire Woes: Trouble finding XL Load rating. Any advice? 2026 EV9 LLR with 20k miles in SoCal (3 year lease) and the Kumho Crugen HP71 EV wore very quickly despite alignment checks etc early in the lease. Note that these stock tires are 130V with XL load rasting. Most disconcerting is that despite some modest tread left, I hydroplaned on some sprinkler runoff...so I'm not confident in these tires with the upcoming El Nino. This subreddit seems to love the Michelin CrossClimate2 but they don't come in XL load rating in this size. Neither do Defenders. The two main options are: 1. **Hankook iON evo AS SUV** (OE on some EV9s) - But these are seemingly backordered at multiple tire shops. An online vendor cancelled my order despite showing in stock on the site. 2. **Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season**. **Any advice, and anyone have experience with those Pirellis?**”
“2026 Pathfinder Tires: 255/60R18 Kumho Crugen HP71 vs 255/50R20 Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra I think I settled on a configuration that suits our needs but it comes with the upgraded 255/50R20 Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra tires/rims. The 20" wheels look great but I think the 18" Kumho's with the taller side will be better for the sometimes rough roads (potholes, large bumps, torn up city streets) we drive and for lighter towing. I highly doubt the dealer will exchange them for me but first I wanted to ask if I'm just overthinking this or should I try to trade down for the 18s. For reference I'm completely satisfied driving an outback with 225/60R18 Yokohama Avid GT (controlled, planted) and not happy with a highlander with 235/65R18 (too soft, uncontrolled). I get that these are different vehicles, suspensions, center of gravity, but hopefully it gives you a better idea. Thanks Edit: clarification on towing: fiberglass trailer like Scamp/Casita”
Based on 52 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Kumho Crugen HP71 | B · Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 63 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9.9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 640 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Kumho Crugen HP71
Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure
Winner: Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure — better treadwear, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure scores 78 vs 37 on treadwear.
Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure scores 79 vs 44 on comfort.
Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure scores 78 vs 44 on dry.
Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure scores 84 vs 51 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure, 81 vs 51 on our wet score.
Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure, 78 vs 44 on our dry score.
Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure, 79 vs 44 on our comfort score.
Michelin Primacy HP Zero Pressure, 78 vs 37 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology