tirewheelguide

Nexen CP641 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Crugen HP71 vs Nexen CP641 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 277 + 48 owner reviews. How we score

CP641 is ahead, 57–47

Check price on Amazon · CP641 or Crugen HP71 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire AKumho

Crugen HP71

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 277 reviews

“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”

Nexen CP641
Tire BNexen

CP641

All Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 48 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 44

    Dry

    CP641 +11
    55
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71CP641
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 53 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online3148

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.5 (est.) + 40% × 30.5 = 44

    CP641: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 47.8 = 55

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for CP641. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 51

    Wet

    CP641 +6
    57
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71CP641
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 56 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online4451

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 56.1 (est.) + 40% × 44 = 51

    CP641: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for CP641. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    CP641 +5
    58
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71CP641
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online4150

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 40.9 = 53

    CP641: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 49.9 = 58

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for CP641. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 44

    Comfort

    CP641 +13
    57
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71CP641
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online3252

    Crugen HP71: 40% × 61.3 (est.) + 60% × 32.2 = 44

    CP641: 40% × 65.2 (est.) + 60% × 51.6 = 57

    No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for CP641. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 54

    Noise

    CP641 +9
    63
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71CP641
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online3659

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 35.8 = 54

    CP641: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 63

    No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71 or CP641. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 37

    Treadwear

    CP641 +21
    58
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71CP641
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 49 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online1953

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.2 (est.) + 40% × 18.5 = 37

    CP641: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 52.7 = 58

    No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for CP641. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 51

    Handling (owners)

    Level
    51
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71CP641
    Reviews found online5151
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Crugen HP71Nexen CP641
Relative Score 47 57
Dry 44 55
Wet 51 57
Snow 53 58
Comfort 44 57
Noise 54 63
Treadwear 37 58
Handling (owners) 51 51

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Crugen HP71

± 7

CP641

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Crugen HP71

Pros

  • Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
  • Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
  • Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
  • Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
All owner themes in the Crugen HP71 review

Tire B CP641

Pros

  • Affordable, budget-friendly pricing
  • Impressive tread life and durability
  • Comfortable ride quality with low noise for many users

Cons

  • Poor wet weather grip and frequent slipping/aquaplaning
  • Excessive road noise or roaring reported by several users
  • Lackluster steering feedback and vague cornering confidence
All owner themes in the CP641 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Crugen HP71

Mixed

Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.

r/Ioniq5 ·1 upvote ·2026-08-30

“The HP71 are actually the OE tire for several trim/MY combinations for the Ioniq 5 and EV6 and they're decent tires. The longest lasting tire is the Defender 2, with the trade off of mediocre traction. I run the Nokian One because it's a batter balance of traction and tread wear than the defender but still quiet and very long-lasting.”
r/volvoc40 ·61 upvotes ·2026-07-08

“Yet Another C40 Wheel Downsize Report I decided to join the crowd in downsizing from the factory 20" wheels to 18" Wheels: Voxx Paso Tires: Kumho Crugen EV HP71 (currently on sale for $500 for a set of 4) I was a bit worried about wheel fitment because of the large brake calipers, but they fit without issue, standard install. I've only put about 100 miles on them so far, but the ride is much more comfortable and these new tires are SO much quieter than the old tires that were installed when I bought the vehicle (CPO): Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 4 I don't have enough data yet to see if this will make a range improvement, but I imagine it will as they're skinnier tires and EV optimized. So far I'm impressed with the Kumho's, especially for the price they're offering. And I think these new wheels look pretty decent! Read more”
r/Cadillac ·2 upvotes ·2026-09-28

“I have The Kumho Crugen HP71 275/50 R22 111H on my 22 ESV Sport And don’t regret it at all. They are much better than original ones and also a lot cheaper in Walmart.”
Top themes
#Affordability and Value#Ride Comfort and Noise#Tread Wear and Longevity#EV Performance and Efficiency#Durability and Quality Issues

Based on 52 community posts

Tire B

Nexen CP641

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HP71 B · Nexen CP641
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available63—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—
Tread depth9.9/32″10/32″
UTQG640 A A400 A A
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi55,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Crugen HP71

Nexen CP641

Winner: Nexen CP641 — better treadwear, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nexen CP641 scores 58 vs 37 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen CP641 scores 57 vs 44 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Nexen CP641 scores 55 vs 44 on dry.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Nexen CP641 scores 63 vs 54 on noise.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HP71
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nexen CP641
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Crugen HP71 or CP641?

Which is better in the wet, Crugen HP71 or CP641?

Nexen CP641, 57 vs 51 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HP71 or CP641?

Nexen CP641, 55 vs 44 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Crugen HP71 or CP641?

Nexen CP641, 58 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Crugen HP71 or CP641?

Nexen CP641, 63 vs 54 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Crugen HP71 or CP641?

Nexen CP641, 57 vs 44 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Crugen HP71 or CP641?

Nexen CP641, 58 vs 37 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology