Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 278 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Head-to-head
Updated
Kumho Crugen HP71 vs Nexen Roadian H/T — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 278 + 21 owner reviews. How we score
Roadian H/T leads, 50–47 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 42 · 21 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
44
Dry
Roadian H/T +448Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Roadian H/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 53 (est.) ≈ 55 (est.) Reviews found online 31 37 Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.5 (est.) + 40% × 30.6 = 44
Roadian H/T: 60% × 55.2 (est.) + 40% × 37.2 = 48
No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Roadian H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
51
Wet
Roadian H/T +354Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Roadian H/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 44 48 Crugen HP71: 60% × 56 (est.) + 40% × 43.8 = 51
Roadian H/T: 60% × 58.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.8 = 54
No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Roadian H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
Crugen HP71 +251Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Roadian H/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 41 38 Crugen HP71: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 40.9 = 53
Roadian H/T: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 38.3 = 51
No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Roadian H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
44
Comfort
Crugen HP71 +242Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Roadian H/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 32 30 Crugen HP71: 40% × 61.3 (est.) + 60% × 32 = 44
Roadian H/T: 40% × 60.9 (est.) + 60% × 30.1 = 42
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Roadian H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
54
Noise
Roadian H/T +660Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Roadian H/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 36 51 Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.5 = 54
Roadian H/T: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.2 = 60
No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71 or Roadian H/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
37
Treadwear
Roadian H/T +1552Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Roadian H/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 49 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 19 42 Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.4 (est.) + 40% × 18.5 = 37
Roadian H/T: 60% × 57.9 (est.) + 40% × 42.4 = 52
No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Roadian H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
51
Handling (owners)
Crugen HP71 +1041Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Roadian H/T Reviews found online 51 41
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Crugen HP71 | Nexen Roadian H/T |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 47 | 50 |
| Dry | 44 | 48 |
| Wet | 51 | 54 |
| Snow | 53 | 51 |
| Comfort | 44 | 42 |
| Noise | 54 | 60 |
| Treadwear | 37 | 52 |
| Handling (owners) | 51 | 41 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
47
/ 100
Crugen HP71
50
/ 100
Roadian H/T
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Crugen HP71
Pros
- Strong value: frequently described as much cheaper than Michelin, Pirelli or Bridgestone alternatives while not feeling like a budget tire.
- Good wet and heavy-rain traction, with some reports of confident light-snow performance.
- Quiet, smooth ride reported by many owners, often as an improvement over the stock tires (Bridgestone Dueler, Pirelli, Hankook).
Cons
- Premature or uneven tread wear is the most common complaint, with reports of tires worn out at roughly 15,000 to 27,000 miles or within 1.5 years, far below the 65,000-mile rating.
- Road and highway noise, including howling that develops with mileage, reported by several owners.
- Vibration and difficulty keeping the tires balanced, in some cases even after repeated balancing and rotations.
Tire B Roadian H/T
Pros
- Excellent value and affordable pricing compared to premium brands
- Long-lasting treadwear with high mileage potential
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Excessive road noise, humming, and roaring often mistaken for bearing failure
- Prone to picking up gravel and stones in the tread blocks
- Poor winter and snow performance reported by some users
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Kumho Crugen HP71
Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.
r/Cadillac
·2 upvotes ·2026-09-28
“I have The Kumho Crugen HP71 275/50 R22 111H on my 22 ESV Sport And don’t regret it at all. They are much better than original ones and also a lot cheaper in Walmart.”
r/KiaEV9
·1 upvote ·2026-09-28
“New Tire Woes: Trouble finding XL Load rating. Any advice? 2026 EV9 LLR with 20k miles in SoCal (3 year lease) and the Kumho Crugen HP71 EV wore very quickly despite alignment checks etc early in the lease. Note that these stock tires are 130V with XL load rasting. Most disconcerting is that despite some modest tread left, I hydroplaned on some sprinkler runoff...so I'm not confident in these tires with the upcoming El Nino. This subreddit seems to love the Michelin CrossClimate2 but they don't come in XL load rating in this size. Neither do Defenders. The two main options are: 1. **Hankook iON evo AS SUV** (OE on some EV9s) - But these are seemingly backordered at multiple tire shops. An online vendor cancelled my order despite showing in stock on the site. 2. **Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season**. **Any advice, and anyone have experience with those Pirellis?**”
r/nissanpathfinder
·1 upvote ·2026-05-31
“2026 Pathfinder Tires: 255/60R18 Kumho Crugen HP71 vs 255/50R20 Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra I think I settled on a configuration that suits our needs but it comes with the upgraded 255/50R20 Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra tires/rims. The 20" wheels look great but I think the 18" Kumho's with the taller side will be better for the sometimes rough roads (potholes, large bumps, torn up city streets) we drive and for lighter towing. I highly doubt the dealer will exchange them for me but first I wanted to ask if I'm just overthinking this or should I try to trade down for the 18s. For reference I'm completely satisfied driving an outback with 225/60R18 Yokohama Avid GT (controlled, planted) and not happy with a highlander with 235/65R18 (too soft, uncontrolled). I get that these are different vehicles, suspensions, center of gravity, but hopefully it gives you a better idea. Thanks Edit: clarification on towing: fiberglass trailer like Scamp/Casita”
Top themes
#Affordability and Value#Ride Comfort and Noise#Tread Wear and Longevity#EV Performance and Efficiency#Durability and Quality Issues
Based on 52 community posts
Tire B
Nexen Roadian H/T
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Crugen HP71 | B · Nexen Roadian H/T |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | All-Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 63 | 18 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 9.9/32″ | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 A A | 520 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Outlined White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 44 psi |
| Sizes in common | 9 | 9 |
Which one should you actually buy?
47
/ 100
Kumho Crugen HP71
50
/ 100
Nexen Roadian H/T
Narrow edge: Nexen Roadian H/T — better treadwear, noise and dry. Pick the Kumho Crugen HP71 if handling matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Nexen Roadian H/T scores 52 vs 37 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Crugen HP71 scores 51 vs 41 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Nexen Roadian H/T scores 60 vs 54 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen Roadian H/T scores 48 vs 44 on dry.
Tire A · Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire B · Nexen Roadian H/T
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Crugen HP71 or Roadian H/T?
Which is better in the wet, Crugen HP71 or Roadian H/T?
Nexen Roadian H/T, 54 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HP71 or Roadian H/T?
Nexen Roadian H/T, 48 vs 44 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Crugen HP71 or Roadian H/T?
Neither, by our numbers: 53 vs 51 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Crugen HP71 or Roadian H/T?
Nexen Roadian H/T, 60 vs 54 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Crugen HP71 or Roadian H/T?
Neither, by our numbers: 44 vs 42 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Crugen HP71 or Roadian H/T?
Nexen Roadian H/T, 52 vs 37 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology