Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 278 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 278 + 40 owner reviews. How we score
Encounter HT is ahead, 66–47
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 278 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Tests – · 1 test Owners 65 · 40 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Encounter HT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 52 (est.) | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 31 | 60 |
Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.5 (est.) + 40% × 30.7 = 44
Encounter HT: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 63
No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Encounter HT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Encounter HT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 56 (est.) | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 44 | 67 |
Crugen HP71: 60% × 56 (est.) + 40% × 43.9 = 51
Encounter HT: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 68
No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Encounter HT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Encounter HT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 61 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 41 | 58 |
Crugen HP71: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 41 = 53
Encounter HT: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 57.5 = 63
No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Encounter HT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Encounter HT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 61 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 32 | 53 |
Crugen HP71: 40% × 61.3 (est.) + 60% × 32.1 = 44
Encounter HT: 40% × 65.6 (est.) + 60% × 53.3 = 58
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Encounter HT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Encounter HT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 36 | 64 |
Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.6 = 54
Encounter HT: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.3 = 66
No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71 or Encounter HT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Encounter HT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 49 (est.) | 70 |
| Reviews found online | 18 | 75 |
Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.3 (est.) + 40% × 18.4 = 37
Encounter HT: 60% × 69.5 + 40% × 74.9 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Encounter HT |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 51 | – |
| Category | Kumho Crugen HP71 | Sumitomo Encounter HT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 47 | 66 |
| Dry | 44 | 63 |
| Wet | 51 | 68 |
| Snow | 53 | 63 |
| Comfort | 44 | 58 |
| Noise | 54 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 37 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 51 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Crugen HP71
Encounter HT
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Crugen HP71 | Encounter HT | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/9 2021 Teknikens Värld Summer Tire Test R18 | #11/13 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.
“I have Kumho Crugen HP71 on my 2022 Peemium they are great and not super expensive. I got them during the Mazda buy 3 get 1 for $1 sale at my local dealership. My Toyos were toast at 36k miles. Been driving on them for 10k miles now. No complaints.”
“Kumho warranty I had these for a little under 18 months. The thread is still good, but the tires have these cracks. Do you guys think I can claim warranty from Kumho? These are Kumho Crugen HP71. Manufacturing date 01/24.”
“Kumho HP71 vs Continental DWS06 I was planning to get Continentals for $150 each, but then I found these Kumhos for $118 each. The Continentals have a treadwear of 560, whereas the Kumhos have a treadwear of 640. They both have A/A for traction/temp. Is it really worth the extra $128 for brand name if the cheaper ones will outlast them?”
Based on 52 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Kumho Crugen HP71 | B · Sumitomo Encounter HT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 63 | 4 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 16″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 9.9/32″ | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 A A | 600 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 44 psi |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Kumho Crugen HP71
Sumitomo Encounter HT
Winner: Sumitomo Encounter HT — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Sumitomo Encounter HT scores 72 vs 37 on treadwear.
Sumitomo Encounter HT scores 63 vs 44 on dry.
Sumitomo Encounter HT scores 68 vs 51 on wet.
Sumitomo Encounter HT scores 58 vs 44 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Sumitomo Encounter HT, 68 vs 51 on our wet score.
Sumitomo Encounter HT, 63 vs 44 on our dry score.
Sumitomo Encounter HT, 63 vs 53 on our snow score.
Sumitomo Encounter HT, 66 vs 54 on our noise score.
Sumitomo Encounter HT, 58 vs 44 on our comfort score.
Sumitomo Encounter HT, 72 vs 37 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology