Tests – · none yet Owners 35 · 275 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Head-to-head
Updated
Kumho Crugen HP71 vs Sumitomo Encounter HT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 275 + 40 owner reviews. How we score
Encounter HT is ahead, 66–47
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 65 · 40 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
44
Dry
Encounter HT +1963Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Encounter HT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 53 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 32 61 Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.8 (est.) + 40% × 31.8 = 44
Encounter HT: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 60.9 = 63
No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Encounter HT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
52
Wet
Encounter HT +1769Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Encounter HT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 45 68 Crugen HP71: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.7 = 52
Encounter HT: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 69
No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Encounter HT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
Encounter HT +1063Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Encounter HT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 42 58 Crugen HP71: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 41.9 = 53
Encounter HT: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 58.1 = 63
No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Encounter HT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
45
Comfort
Encounter HT +1459Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Encounter HT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 33 54 Crugen HP71: 40% × 62.6 (est.) + 60% × 33.4 = 45
Encounter HT: 40% × 66.4 (est.) + 60% × 54.4 = 59
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71 or Encounter HT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
55
Noise
Encounter HT +1166Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Encounter HT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 37 65 Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 36.7 = 55
Encounter HT: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66
No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71 or Encounter HT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
37
Treadwear
Encounter HT +3572Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Encounter HT Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 49 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 18 75 Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.5 (est.) + 40% × 18.3 = 37
Encounter HT: 60% × 69.5 + 40% × 74.8 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
52
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Encounter HT Reviews found online 52 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Crugen HP71 | Sumitomo Encounter HT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 47 | 66 |
| Dry | 44 | 63 |
| Wet | 52 | 69 |
| Snow | 53 | 63 |
| Comfort | 45 | 59 |
| Noise | 55 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 37 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 52 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
47
/ 100
Crugen HP71
66
/ 100
Encounter HT
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Crugen HP71 | Encounter HT | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/9 2021 Teknikens Värld Summer Tire Test R18 | #11/13 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Crugen HP71
Pros
- Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
- Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
- Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain
Cons
- Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
- Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
- Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
Tire B Encounter HT
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Kumho Crugen HP71
Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.
r/VolvoRecharge
·1 upvote ·2026-10-05
“Kumho Crugen HP71 235/50R19XL 103V BSW ($132.44/each) Total: $264.88 Kumho Crugen EV HP71 255/45R19XL 104V BSW ($287.70/each Gigatires about a month ago I feel like they're just as good as the Continentals that came with the car It's crazy that these EVS have different size tires front and rear, prevents rotating tires for even wear. It's also surprising that the cost difference from the front the rear was so much different. It was also like that with numerous other manufacturers. I also drive about 24,000 mi a year, so we'll see if they hold up.”
r/nissanpathfinder
·1 upvote ·2026-05-31
“2026 Pathfinder Tires: 255/60R18 Kumho Crugen HP71 vs 255/50R20 Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra I think I settled on a configuration that suits our needs but it comes with the upgraded 255/50R20 Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra tires/rims. The 20" wheels look great but I think the 18" Kumho's with the taller side will be better for the sometimes rough roads (potholes, large bumps, torn up city streets) we drive and for lighter towing. I highly doubt the dealer will exchange them for me but first I wanted to ask if I'm just overthinking this or should I try to trade down for the 18s. For reference I'm completely satisfied driving an outback with 225/60R18 Yokohama Avid GT (controlled, planted) and not happy with a highlander with 235/65R18 (too soft, uncontrolled). I get that these are different vehicles, suspensions, center of gravity, but hopefully it gives you a better idea. Thanks Edit: clarification on towing: fiberglass trailer like Scamp/Casita”
r/CadillacLyriq
·4 upvotes ·2026-09-20
“How many miles do you guys get on tires? I had a blowout back in June, and decided to just buy a full set. The shop had a promo on these KumHo Crugen HP71 tires, which had a 65,000 mile warranty. 3 months and 12,000 miles later, my tread is completely gone. I got some Michelins and was credited 185 bucks per tire, but this seems insanely low mileage to wear out the tread completely. I know the added weight and torque of an EV somewhat lowers the lifespan of tires, but even if I was driving like a demon, I don't think 12,000 miles should be anywhere near the lifespan of a reputable brand.”
Top themes
#Affordability and Value#Ride Comfort and Noise#Tread Wear and Longevity#EV Performance and Efficiency#Durability and Quality Issues
Based on 52 community posts
Tire B
Sumitomo Encounter HT
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Crugen HP71 | B · Sumitomo Encounter HT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 63 | 4 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 16″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 9.9/32″ | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 A A | 600 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 44 psi |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Which one should you actually buy?
47
/ 100
Kumho Crugen HP71
66
/ 100
Sumitomo Encounter HT
Winner: Sumitomo Encounter HT — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Sumitomo Encounter HT scores 72 vs 37 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Sumitomo Encounter HT scores 63 vs 44 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Sumitomo Encounter HT scores 69 vs 52 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Sumitomo Encounter HT scores 59 vs 45 on comfort.
Tire A · Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire B · Sumitomo Encounter HT
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Crugen HP71 or Encounter HT?
Which is better in the wet, Crugen HP71 or Encounter HT?
Sumitomo Encounter HT, 69 vs 52 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HP71 or Encounter HT?
Sumitomo Encounter HT, 63 vs 44 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Crugen HP71 or Encounter HT?
Sumitomo Encounter HT, 63 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Crugen HP71 or Encounter HT?
Sumitomo Encounter HT, 66 vs 55 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Crugen HP71 or Encounter HT?
Sumitomo Encounter HT, 59 vs 45 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Crugen HP71 or Encounter HT?
Sumitomo Encounter HT, 72 vs 37 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology