Tests – · none yet Owners 41 · 275 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Kumho Crugen HP71 vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 275 + 12 owner reviews. How we score
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth is ahead, 61–51
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 12 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
48
Dry
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +1361Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 55 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 37 58 Crugen HP71: 60% × 55.2 (est.) + 40% × 36.6 = 48
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61
No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
55
Wet
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +257Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 49 53 Crugen HP71: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 49.1 = 55
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 57
No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
57
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) – Reviews found online 48 – Crugen HP71: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 47.6 = 57
No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
54
Comfort
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +1165Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 40 62 Crugen HP71: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 39.6 = 54
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
58
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 44 – Crugen HP71: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 43.7 = 58
No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
44
Treadwear
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +2165Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 54 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 29 64 Crugen HP71: 60% × 54.4 (est.) + 40% × 29.1 = 44
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
55
Handling (owners)
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +358Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Reviews found online 55 58
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Crugen HP71 | Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 51 | 61 |
| Dry | 48 | 61 |
| Wet | 55 | 57 |
| Snow | 57 | – |
| Comfort | 54 | 65 |
| Noise | 58 | – |
| Treadwear | 44 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 55 | 58 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
51
/ 100
Crugen HP71
61
/ 100
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Crugen HP71
Pros
- Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
- Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
- Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain
Cons
- Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
- Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
- Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
Tire B Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Pros
- Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
- Adequate dry road grip and handling
Cons
- Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
- Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
- Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Kumho Crugen HP71
Community sentiment for the Kumho Crugen HP71 (and its EV variant) is mixed, with owners praising its affordability, comfortable ride, and quiet performance on many vehicles. However, a significant number of drivers report disappointingly rapid tread wear—particularly on heavy electric vehicles—as well as occasional noise on coarse surfaces and internal acoustic foam detachment issues.
bobistheoilguy.com
·2023-03-02
“Bought a set of Kumho tires to replace the OE Michelins on the wife's Ford Edge. The Michelins have barely 35K and aren't going to pass the NC safety check. For being a top tier tire they were wildly mediocre. I've has several sets of Kumho and they are better than average and not too expensive. I bought four of these. Anybody have experience with Kumhos? Kumho Crugen HP71 245 /60 R18 105V SL BSW”
r/VWiD4Owners
·3 upvotes ·2026-02-14
“2023 ID4 AWD Pro S Kumho Crugen EV HP71 I replaced the original worn down (and one with a sidewall bump) Pirellis at 33k with the EV version (badges on the sidewall) of the HP71 (direct from dealer). They're more expensive than the non-EV versions and have a lower warranty. So far they're impressive: ride is softer/smoother, quieter, deep treads. Hard to tell if efficiency changed with the winter weather, but we were getting 3mi/kWh on a 34 degree day.”
teslamotorsclub.com
·2 upvotes ·2026-02-12
“That is a crazy good price - The TA91 is low $200s wholesale! (Tire shop pricing). And $279.30 retail. (Tire Rack) Grab them while you can. Sometimes Wal Mart beats any price I can get when they're blowing out a specific tire. FWIW we run the Kumho HP71 EV (OE tire) on our EV9 and it's a super quiet tire. I bought it again for the Spring now that the car is actually aligned and won't burn through them.”
Top themes
#Rapid tread wear#Affordable price value#Cabin noise levels#Ride comfort#EV tire performance#Acoustic foam issues#OEM tire replacement
Based on 51 community posts
Tire B
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Crugen HP71 | B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 63 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9.9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 640 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
51
/ 100
Kumho Crugen HP71
61
/ 100
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — better treadwear, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth scores 65 vs 44 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth scores 61 vs 48 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth scores 65 vs 54 on comfort.
Tire A · Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Crugen HP71 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Which is better in the wet, Crugen HP71 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Neither, by our numbers: 55 vs 57 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HP71 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth, 61 vs 48 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Crugen HP71 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth, 65 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Crugen HP71 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth, 65 vs 44 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology