tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Crugen HP71 vs Yokohama Geolandar G91A — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 278 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

Crugen HP71 is ahead, 47–39

Check price on Amazon · Crugen HP71 or Geolandar G91A on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire AKumho

Crugen HP71

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 278 reviews

“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”

Yokohama Geolandar G91A
Tire BYokohama

Geolandar G91A

All-Season tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 24 · 5 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 44

    Dry

    Crugen HP71 +6
    38
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Geolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 52 (est.)≈ 49 (est.)
    Reviews found online3122

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.5 (est.) + 40% × 30.7 = 44

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 48.7 (est.) + 40% × 21.6 = 38

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 51

    Wet

    Crugen HP71 +18
    33
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Geolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 56 (est.)≈ 43 (est.)
    Reviews found online4420

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 56 (est.) + 40% × 43.9 = 51

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 42.7 (est.) + 40% × 19.6 = 33

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    Crugen HP71 +4
    49
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Geolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online4133

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 41 = 53

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 33.4 = 49

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 44

    Comfort

    Crugen HP71 +12
    32
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Geolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online3214

    Crugen HP71: 40% × 61.3 (est.) + 60% × 32.1 = 44

    Geolandar G91A: 40% × 57.7 (est.) + 60% × 14.3 = 32

    No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 54

    Noise

    Crugen HP71 +1
    53
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Geolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online3633

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.6 = 54

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 32.8 = 53

    No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71 or Geolandar G91A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 37

    Treadwear

    Geolandar G91A +3
    40
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Geolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 49 (est.)≈ 51 (est.)
    Reviews found online1824

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.3 (est.) + 40% × 18.4 = 37

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 51.2 (est.) + 40% × 23.7 = 40

    No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 51

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Geolandar G91A
    Reviews found online51–
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Crugen HP71Yokohama Geolandar G91A
Relative Score 47 39
Dry 44 38
Wet 51 33
Snow 53 49
Comfort 44 32
Noise 54 53
Treadwear 37 40
Handling (owners) 51 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Crugen HP71

± 8

Geolandar G91A

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Crugen HP71

Pros

  • Strong value: frequently described as much cheaper than Michelin, Pirelli or Bridgestone alternatives while not feeling like a budget tire.
  • Good wet and heavy-rain traction, with some reports of confident light-snow performance.
  • Quiet, smooth ride reported by many owners, often as an improvement over the stock tires (Bridgestone Dueler, Pirelli, Hankook).

Cons

  • Premature or uneven tread wear is the most common complaint, with reports of tires worn out at roughly 15,000 to 27,000 miles or within 1.5 years, far below the 65,000-mile rating.
  • Road and highway noise, including howling that develops with mileage, reported by several owners.
  • Vibration and difficulty keeping the tires balanced, in some cases even after repeated balancing and rotations.
All owner themes in the Crugen HP71 review

Tire B Geolandar G91A

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Crugen HP71

Mixed

Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.

r/KiaEV9 ·1 upvote ·2026-09-28

“New Tire Woes: Trouble finding XL Load rating. Any advice? 2026 EV9 LLR with 20k miles in SoCal (3 year lease) and the Kumho Crugen HP71 EV wore very quickly despite alignment checks etc early in the lease. Note that these stock tires are 130V with XL load rasting. Most disconcerting is that despite some modest tread left, I hydroplaned on some sprinkler runoff...so I'm not confident in these tires with the upcoming El Nino. This subreddit seems to love the Michelin CrossClimate2 but they don't come in XL load rating in this size. Neither do Defenders. The two main options are: 1. **Hankook iON evo AS SUV** (OE on some EV9s) - But these are seemingly backordered at multiple tire shops. An online vendor cancelled my order despite showing in stock on the site. 2. **Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season**. **Any advice, and anyone have experience with those Pirellis?**”
r/Cadillac ·2 upvotes ·2026-09-28

“I have The Kumho Crugen HP71 275/50 R22 111H on my 22 ESV Sport And don’t regret it at all. They are much better than original ones and also a lot cheaper in Walmart.”
r/AskAMechanic ·1 upvote ·2026-07-26

“I need a new tire, right? 215/55R18 Kumho Crugen HP71 tire showing cords on the outer sidewall. I need a new tire, right? Edit: I’m thinking about replacing just this one tire, 2023 CX-30 AWD. Tires were new Oct 2025 and have 7mm tread depth left. According to the spec sheet, this new tire would have 7.9mm of depth. Can I get away with one tire? Edit 2: Existing vs new tires would have ~1mm of difference in tread depth Read more”
Top themes
#Affordability and Value#Ride Comfort and Noise#Tread Wear and Longevity#EV Performance and Efficiency#Durability and Quality Issues

Based on 52 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama Geolandar G91A

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HP71 B · Yokohama Geolandar G91A
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresAll-Season tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available631
Rim diameters16″ – 22″17″
Tread depth9.9/32″10/32″
UTQG640 A A280 B A
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Crugen HP71

Yokohama Geolandar G91A

Winner: Kumho Crugen HP71 — better wet, comfort and dry. Pick the Yokohama Geolandar G91A if treadwear matters most to you. Yokohama Geolandar G91A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HP71 scores 51 vs 33 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Crugen HP71 scores 44 vs 32 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Crugen HP71 scores 44 vs 38 on dry.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Crugen HP71 scores 53 vs 49 on snow.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HP71
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G91A
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Crugen HP71 or Geolandar G91A?

Which is better in the wet, Crugen HP71 or Geolandar G91A?

Kumho Crugen HP71, 51 vs 33 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HP71 or Geolandar G91A?

Kumho Crugen HP71, 44 vs 38 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Crugen HP71 or Geolandar G91A?

Kumho Crugen HP71, 53 vs 49 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Crugen HP71 or Geolandar G91A?

Neither, by our numbers: 54 vs 53 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Crugen HP71 or Geolandar G91A?

Kumho Crugen HP71, 44 vs 32 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Crugen HP71 or Geolandar G91A?

Yokohama Geolandar G91A, 40 vs 37 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology