Hankook Optimo H724 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Crugen HT51 vs Hankook Optimo H724 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 164 + 169 owner reviews. How we score

Crugen HT51 is ahead, 72–67

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire AKumho

Crugen HT51

All Season

± 8

Tests – · 1 test Owners 76 · 164 reviews

Hankook Optimo H724
Tire BHankook

Optimo H724

All-Season tire

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 169 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Crugen HT51 +7
    67
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Optimo H724
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7766

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 74

    Optimo H724: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 67

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Optimo H724. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 76

    Wet

    Crugen HT51 +7
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Optimo H724
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 75 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7868

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 75 (est.) + 40% × 78.4 = 76

    Optimo H724: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Optimo H724. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 70

    Snow

    Crugen HT51 +7
    63
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Optimo H724
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7058

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70

    Optimo H724: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 58.4 = 63

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Optimo H724. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    Crugen HT51 +4
    66
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Optimo H724
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7165

    Crugen HT51: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.1 = 70

    Optimo H724: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 64.9 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for Crugen HT51 or Optimo H724. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 72

    Noise

    Crugen HT51 +4
    68
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Optimo H724
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7969

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.4 = 72

    Optimo H724: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 68

    No road tests of noise for Crugen HT51 or Optimo H724. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Optimo H724 +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Optimo H724
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests58≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7666

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 57.7 + 40% × 76.3 = 65

    Optimo H724: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H724. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Optimo H724
    Reviews found online74–
Scores at a glance
Kumho Crugen HT51 vs Hankook Optimo H724: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Crugen HT51Hankook Optimo H724
Relative Score 72 67
Dry 74 67
Wet 76 69
Snow 70 63
Comfort 70 66
Noise 72 68
Treadwear 65 66
Handling (owners) 74 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Crugen HT51

± 8

Optimo H724

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Crugen HT51

Pros

  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
  • Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction

Cons

  • Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
  • Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
  • Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
All owner themes in the Crugen HT51 review

Tire B Optimo H724

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HT51 B · Hankook Optimo H724
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Season tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available44—
Rim diameters15″ – 22″—
Tread depth12.5/32″10/32″
UTQG720 A A500 A B
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi70,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Crugen HT51

Hankook Optimo H724

Winner: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better dry, wet and snow. Where the Hankook Optimo H724 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 74 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 76 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 70 vs 63 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 70 vs 66 on comfort.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire B · Hankook Optimo H724

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Crugen HT51 or Optimo H724?

Which is better in the wet, Crugen HT51 or Optimo H724?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 76 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HT51 or Optimo H724?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 74 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Crugen HT51 or Optimo H724?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 70 vs 63 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Crugen HT51 or Optimo H724?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 72 vs 68 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Crugen HT51 or Optimo H724?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 70 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Crugen HT51 or Optimo H724?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology