Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Crugen HT51 vs Kumho Ecsta KU19 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 164 + 8 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta KU19 is ahead, 74–67

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire AKumho

Crugen HT51

All Season

± 9

Tests 55 · 2 tests Owners 75 · 164 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 9 in 2024 Tire Rack Highway All Season Tyre Test (dry circle)

Kumho Ecsta KU19
Tire BKumho

Ecsta KU19

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 8 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    Ecsta KU19 +8
    73
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Ecsta KU19
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests58≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7675

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 58.2 + 40% × 75.8 = 65

    Ecsta KU19: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta KU19. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 67

    Wet

    Ecsta KU19 +9
    76
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Ecsta KU19
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests60≈ 75 (est.)
    Reviews found online7878

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 59.5 + 40% × 78 = 67

    Ecsta KU19: 60% × 74.7 (est.) + 40% × 78 = 76

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta KU19. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 49

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Ecsta KU19
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests36–
    Reviews found online70–

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 35.7 + 40% × 69.5 = 49

  4. 70

    Comfort

    Ecsta KU19 +4
    74
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Ecsta KU19
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7077

    Crugen HT51: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 70.4 = 70

    Ecsta KU19: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 76.5 = 74

    No road tests of comfort for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Ecsta KU19. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 72

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Ecsta KU19
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online79–

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 79.1 = 72

    No road tests of noise for Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Ecsta KU19 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Ecsta KU19
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests58≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7671

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 58.4 + 40% × 76.4 = 66

    Ecsta KU19: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta KU19. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    Ecsta KU19 +4
    78
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Ecsta KU19
    Reviews found online7478
Scores at a glance
Kumho Crugen HT51 vs Kumho Ecsta KU19: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Crugen HT51Kumho Ecsta KU19
Relative Score 67 74
Dry 65 73
Wet 67 76
Snow 49 –
Comfort 70 74
Noise 72 –
Treadwear 66 69
Handling (owners) 74 78

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 9

Crugen HT51

± 8

Ecsta KU19

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Crugen HT51

Pros

  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
  • Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction

Cons

  • Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
  • Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
  • Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
All owner themes in the Crugen HT51 review

Tire B Ecsta KU19

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry grip performance
  • Superior noise suppression at highway speeds
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Softer sidewall construction may not suit all driving styles
  • Limited long-term tread life data available from current user reports
  • Potential for inconsistent handling feel if mixed with stiffer-sidewall tires on the same axle
All owner themes in the Ecsta KU19 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HT51 B · Kumho Ecsta KU19
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available441
Rim diameters15″ – 22″18″
Tread depth12.5/32″—
UTQG720 A A—
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Crugen HT51

Kumho Ecsta KU19

Winner: Kumho Ecsta KU19 — better wet, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Kumho Ecsta KU19 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta KU19 scores 76 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta KU19 scores 73 vs 65 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Ecsta KU19 scores 74 vs 70 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecsta KU19 scores 69 vs 66 on treadwear.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta KU19

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Crugen HT51 or Ecsta KU19?

Which is better in the wet, Crugen HT51 or Ecsta KU19?

Kumho Ecsta KU19, 76 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HT51 or Ecsta KU19?

Kumho Ecsta KU19, 73 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Crugen HT51 or Ecsta KU19?

Kumho Ecsta KU19, 74 vs 70 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Crugen HT51 or Ecsta KU19?

Kumho Ecsta KU19, 69 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology