Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Crugen HT51 vs Kumho Ecsta STX KL12 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 164 + 15 owner reviews. How we score

Crugen HT51 leads, 65–63 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire AKumho

Crugen HT51

All Season

± 8

Tests 55 · 2 tests Owners 75 · 164 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 9 in 2024 Tire Rack Highway All Season Tyre Test (dry circle)

Kumho Ecsta STX KL12
Tire BKumho

Ecsta STX KL12

Summer High Performance tires

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 15 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    Crugen HT51 +1
    64
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Ecsta STX KL12
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests58≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7662

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 58.2 + 40% × 75.8 = 65

    Ecsta STX KL12: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 64

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta STX KL12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 67

    Wet

    Crugen HT51 +6
    61
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Ecsta STX KL12
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests60≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7857

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 59.5 + 40% × 78 = 67

    Ecsta STX KL12: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 61

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta STX KL12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 49

    Snow

    Ecsta STX KL12 +15
    64
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Ecsta STX KL12
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests36≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7059

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 35.7 + 40% × 69.5 = 49

    Ecsta STX KL12: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 59.1 = 64

    No road tests of snow for Ecsta STX KL12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    Crugen HT51 +7
    63
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Ecsta STX KL12
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7061

    Crugen HT51: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 70.4 = 70

    Ecsta STX KL12: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 60.6 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Ecsta STX KL12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 72

    Noise

    Crugen HT51 +5
    67
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Ecsta STX KL12
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7967

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 79.1 = 72

    Ecsta STX KL12: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Crugen HT51 or Ecsta STX KL12. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Crugen HT51 +4
    62
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Ecsta STX KL12
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests58≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7659

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 58.4 + 40% × 76.4 = 66

    Ecsta STX KL12: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 58.7 = 62

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta STX KL12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    Crugen HT51 +17
    57
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Ecsta STX KL12
    Reviews found online7457
Scores at a glance
Kumho Crugen HT51 vs Kumho Ecsta STX KL12: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Crugen HT51Kumho Ecsta STX KL12
Relative Score 65 63
Dry 65 64
Wet 67 61
Snow 49 64
Comfort 70 63
Noise 72 67
Treadwear 66 62
Handling (owners) 74 57

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Crugen HT51

± 8

Ecsta STX KL12

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Crugen HT51

Pros

  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
  • Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction

Cons

  • Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
  • Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
  • Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
All owner themes in the Crugen HT51 review

Tire B Ecsta STX KL12

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • High tread life and durability
  • Strong wet weather grip and cornering stability

Cons

  • Potential for increased road noise over time
  • Inconsistent traction performance on certain vehicle chassis
  • Accelerated wear on poor road surfaces
All owner themes in the Ecsta STX KL12 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HT51 B · Kumho Ecsta STX KL12
CategoryAll SeasonSummer High Performance tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available447
Rim diameters15″ – 22″18″ – 22″
Tread depth12.5/32″11.5/32″
UTQG720 A A420 A A
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi50 psi
Sizes in common11

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Crugen HT51

Kumho Ecsta STX KL12

Narrow edge: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better handling, comfort and wet. Pick the Kumho Ecsta STX KL12 if snow matters most to you. Kumho Ecsta STX KL12 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 15 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 74 vs 57 on handling.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Ecsta STX KL12 scores 64 vs 49 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 70 vs 63 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 67 vs 61 on wet.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta STX KL12

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Crugen HT51 or Ecsta STX KL12?

Which is better in the wet, Crugen HT51 or Ecsta STX KL12?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 67 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HT51 or Ecsta STX KL12?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 64 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Crugen HT51 or Ecsta STX KL12?

Kumho Ecsta STX KL12, 64 vs 49 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Crugen HT51 or Ecsta STX KL12?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 72 vs 67 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Crugen HT51 or Ecsta STX KL12?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 70 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Crugen HT51 or Ecsta STX KL12?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 66 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology