Tests – · 1 test Owners 76 · 164 reviews
Kumho Crugen HT51 vs Michelin Defender LTX M/S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 164 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
Defender LTX M/S is ahead, 78–71
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 82 · 10 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
Defender LTX M/S +478Why this score
Source Crugen HT51 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 77 83 Crugen HT51: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 74
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 74.5 (est.) + 40% × 83.3 = 78
No road tests of dry for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
76
Wet
Defender LTX M/S +581Why this score
Source Crugen HT51 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 75 (est.) ≈ 78 (est.) Reviews found online 79 84 Crugen HT51: 60% × 75 (est.) + 40% × 78.5 = 76
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 78.2 (est.) + 40% × 84.2 = 81
No road tests of wet for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
70
Snow
Defender LTX M/S +474Why this score
Source Crugen HT51 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 70 76 Crugen HT51: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 72.7 (est.) + 40% × 76 = 74
No road tests of snow for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
70
Comfort
Defender LTX M/S +575Why this score
Source Crugen HT51 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 71 78 Crugen HT51: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.1 = 70
Defender LTX M/S: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 77.6 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HT51 or Defender LTX M/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
72
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Crugen HT51 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 80 – Crugen HT51: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.5 = 72
No road tests of noise for Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
Defender LTX M/S +1479Why this score
Source Crugen HT51 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 58 75 Reviews found online 76 85 Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 58% 84% Crugen HT51: 60% × 57.7 + 40% × 76.4 = 65
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 85.1 = 79
-
74
Handling (owners)
Defender LTX M/S +680Why this score
Source Crugen HT51 Defender LTX M/S Reviews found online 74 80
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Crugen HT51 | Michelin Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 78 |
| Dry | 74 | 78 |
| Wet | 76 | 81 |
| Snow | 70 | 74 |
| Comfort | 70 | 75 |
| Noise | 72 | – |
| Treadwear | 65 | 79 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Crugen HT51
Defender LTX M/S
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Kumho Crugen HT51 finished ahead 0 times and Michelin Defender LTX M/S 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | Crugen HT51 | Defender LTX M/S | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Treadwear | 58% | 84% | −26.3 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires · 215/60R17 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #5/13 | #3/13 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires · 215/60R17 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Crugen HT51
Pros
- Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
- Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
- Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction
Cons
- Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
- Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
- Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
Tire B Defender LTX M/S
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and mileage lifespan
- Quiet and smooth ride quality at highway speeds
- Strong year-round traction across dry, wet, and light snow conditions
Cons
- High upfront purchase price
- Subpar performance in deep mud, sand, and off-road environments
- Limited ice and severe winter capability compared to dedicated winter tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Crugen HT51 | B · Michelin Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 44 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 12.5/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 720 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 70,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho Crugen HT51
Michelin Defender LTX M/S
Winner: Michelin Defender LTX M/S — better treadwear, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Defender LTX M/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 79 vs 65 on treadwear.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 80 vs 74 on handling.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 81 vs 76 on wet.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 75 vs 70 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Crugen HT51 or Defender LTX M/S?
Which is better in the wet, Crugen HT51 or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 81 vs 76 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HT51 or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 78 vs 74 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Crugen HT51 or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 74 vs 70 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Crugen HT51 or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 75 vs 70 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Crugen HT51 or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 79 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology