tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Crugen HT51 vs Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 164 + 3 owner reviews. How we score

Crugen HT51 leads, 72–70 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Crugen HT51 or Roadian H/TX RT5 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire AKumho

Crugen HT51

All Season

Tests – · 1 test Owners 75 · 164 reviews

Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5
Tire BNexen

Roadian H/TX RT5

All Season Touring tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 3 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Crugen HT51 +3
    70
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Roadian H/TX RT5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7771

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 73

    Roadian H/TX RT5: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Roadian H/TX RT5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 75

    Wet

    Crugen HT51 +2
    73
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Roadian H/TX RT5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online7774

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 75

    Roadian H/TX RT5: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 73

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Roadian H/TX RT5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 70

    Snow

    Crugen HT51 +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Roadian H/TX RT5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7068

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 70

    Roadian H/TX RT5: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.7 = 69

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Roadian H/TX RT5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 71

    Comfort

    Level
    71
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Roadian H/TX RT5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7274

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 71

    Roadian H/TX RT5: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for Crugen HT51 or Roadian H/TX RT5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 72

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Roadian H/TX RT5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online78–

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.3 = 72

    No road tests of noise for Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    Level
    64
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Roadian H/TX RT5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests58≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7462

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 57.7 + 40% × 74.1 = 64

    Roadian H/TX RT5: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for Roadian H/TX RT5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 75

    Handling (owners)

    Crugen HT51 +4
    71
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Roadian H/TX RT5
    Reviews found online7571
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Crugen HT51Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5
Relative Score 72 70
Dry 73 70
Wet 75 73
Snow 70 69
Comfort 71 71
Noise 72 –
Treadwear 64 64
Handling (owners) 75 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Crugen HT51

Roadian H/TX RT5

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Crugen HT51

Pros

  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
  • Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction

Cons

  • Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
  • Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
  • Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
All owner themes in the Crugen HT51 review

Tire B Roadian H/TX RT5

Pros

  • Strong initial traction in varied weather conditions including snow, slush, and ice
  • Excellent performance for towing applications
  • Impressive off-road capability, particularly in soft sand

Cons

  • Noticeable decline in grip and handling characteristics after 8,000-10,000 miles
  • Increased susceptibility to oversteer and instability on wet surfaces as tread wears
  • Harsh ride quality and unpredictable handling at higher tire pressures
All owner themes in the Roadian H/TX RT5 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HT51 B · Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season Touring tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4—
Sizes available44—
Rim diameters15″ – 22″—
Tread depth12.5/32″—
UTQG720 A A—
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Crugen HT51

Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5

Narrow edge: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 73 vs 70 on dry.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HT51
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Crugen HT51 or Roadian H/TX RT5?

Which is better in the wet, Crugen HT51 or Roadian H/TX RT5?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 73 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HT51 or Roadian H/TX RT5?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 73 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Crugen HT51 or Roadian H/TX RT5?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Crugen HT51 or Roadian H/TX RT5?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Crugen HT51 or Roadian H/TX RT5?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 64 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology