Kumho Ecsta 712 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Kumho Ecsta XT KU37 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta 712 vs Kumho Ecsta XT KU37 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta XT KU37 is ahead, 56–48

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta 712
Tire AKumho

Ecsta 712

All Season

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 41 · 10 reviews

Kumho Ecsta XT KU37
Tire BKumho

Ecsta XT KU37

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 11 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 48

    Dry

    Ecsta XT KU37 +8
    56
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta 712Ecsta XT KU37
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online3749

    Ecsta 712: 60% × 55.4 (est.) + 40% × 37.1 = 48

    Ecsta XT KU37: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 49.1 = 56

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta 712. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta XT KU37. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 44

    Wet

    Ecsta XT KU37 +13
    57
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta 712Ecsta XT KU37
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 50 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online3553

    Ecsta 712: 60% × 50.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.8 = 44

    Ecsta XT KU37: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta 712. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta XT KU37. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 51

    Comfort

    Ecsta XT KU37 +10
    61
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta 712Ecsta XT KU37
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online3352

    Ecsta 712: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 33.2 = 51

    Ecsta XT KU37: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 52.4 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for Ecsta 712 or Ecsta XT KU37. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 59

    Treadwear

    Ecsta 712 +2
    57
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta 712Ecsta XT KU37
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online5451

    Ecsta 712: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 59

    Ecsta XT KU37: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 57

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta 712. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta XT KU37. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  5. 34

    Handling (owners)

    Ecsta XT KU37 +15
    49
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta 712Ecsta XT KU37
    Reviews found online3449
Scores at a glance
Kumho Ecsta 712 vs Kumho Ecsta XT KU37: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta 712Kumho Ecsta XT KU37
Relative Score 48 56
Dry 48 56
Wet 44 57
Comfort 51 61
Treadwear 59 57
Handling (owners) 34 49

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ecsta 712

Ecsta XT KU37

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta 712

Pros

  • Highly competitive price point
  • Better-than-average tread life compared to some premium performance tires
  • Acceptable dry weather handling for casual driving

Cons

  • Dangerous and unpredictable wet weather traction
  • High levels of road noise and harsh ride quality
  • Poor steering feedback and tendency for understeer/oversteer
All owner themes in the Ecsta 712 review

Tire B Ecsta XT KU37

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • Low road noise levels
  • Good dry-weather stability and cornering

Cons

  • Inconsistent wet-weather grip and confidence
  • Lack of steering feedback and road feel
  • Tendency to lose traction under hard acceleration
All owner themes in the Ecsta XT KU37 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta 712 B · Kumho Ecsta XT KU37
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta 712

Kumho Ecsta XT KU37

Winner: Kumho Ecsta XT KU37 — better handling, wet and comfort. Where the Kumho Ecsta 712 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Kumho Ecsta 712 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Kumho Ecsta XT KU37 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecsta XT KU37 scores 49 vs 34 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta XT KU37 scores 57 vs 44 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Ecsta XT KU37 scores 61 vs 51 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta XT KU37 scores 56 vs 48 on dry.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta 712
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta XT KU37

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecsta 712 or Ecsta XT KU37?

Which is better in the wet, Ecsta 712 or Ecsta XT KU37?

Kumho Ecsta XT KU37, 57 vs 44 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta 712 or Ecsta XT KU37?

Kumho Ecsta XT KU37, 56 vs 48 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecsta 712 or Ecsta XT KU37?

Kumho Ecsta XT KU37, 61 vs 51 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecsta 712 or Ecsta XT KU37?

Neither, by our numbers: 59 vs 57 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology