Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 33 reviews
Kumho Ecsta XT KU37 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Kumho Ecsta LE Sport vs Kumho Ecsta XT KU37 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 33 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Ecsta LE Sport is ahead, 62–55
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 11 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
61
Dry
Ecsta LE Sport +655Why this score
Source Ecsta LE Sport Ecsta XT KU37 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 57 48 Ecsta LE Sport: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 56.6 = 61
Ecsta XT KU37: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 48.2 = 55
No road tests of dry for Ecsta LE Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Ecsta XT KU37. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
65
Wet
Ecsta LE Sport +956Why this score
Source Ecsta LE Sport Ecsta XT KU37 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 63 51 Ecsta LE Sport: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 65
Ecsta XT KU37: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 51.1 = 56
No road tests of wet for Ecsta LE Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Ecsta XT KU37. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
62
Comfort
Ecsta LE Sport +656Why this score
Source Ecsta LE Sport Ecsta XT KU37 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 59 49 Ecsta LE Sport: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 58.9 = 62
Ecsta XT KU37: 40% × 65.5 (est.) + 60% × 49.4 = 56
No road tests of comfort for Ecsta LE Sport or Ecsta XT KU37. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
60
Treadwear
Ecsta LE Sport +555Why this score
Source Ecsta LE Sport Ecsta XT KU37 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 55 48 Ecsta LE Sport: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 60
Ecsta XT KU37: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 47.7 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta LE Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta XT KU37. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
60
Handling (owners)
Ecsta LE Sport +1347Why this score
Source Ecsta LE Sport Ecsta XT KU37 Reviews found online 60 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta LE Sport | Kumho Ecsta XT KU37 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 55 |
| Dry | 61 | 55 |
| Wet | 65 | 56 |
| Comfort | 62 | 56 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | 60 | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ecsta LE Sport
Ecsta XT KU37
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecsta LE Sport
Pros
- Exceptional value compared to premium tier brands
- Strong dry and wet road grip when relatively new
- Predictable and progressive handling limits near the edge
Cons
- Rapid and uneven tread wear, particularly on front or driven wheels
- Fragile sidewalls prone to bubbling or damage from minor impacts
- Noticeable drop-off in performance and increased tramlining as the tread wears down
Tire B Ecsta XT KU37
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Low road noise levels
- Good dry-weather stability and cornering
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather grip and confidence
- Lack of steering feedback and road feel
- Tendency to lose traction under hard acceleration
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta LE Sport | B · Kumho Ecsta XT KU37 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho Ecsta LE Sport
Kumho Ecsta XT KU37
Winner: Kumho Ecsta LE Sport — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Kumho Ecsta XT KU37 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Kumho Ecsta LE Sport scores 60 vs 47 on handling.
Kumho Ecsta LE Sport scores 65 vs 56 on wet.
Kumho Ecsta LE Sport scores 61 vs 55 on dry.
Kumho Ecsta LE Sport scores 62 vs 56 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecsta LE Sport or Ecsta XT KU37?
Which is better in the wet, Ecsta LE Sport or Ecsta XT KU37?
Kumho Ecsta LE Sport, 65 vs 56 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta LE Sport or Ecsta XT KU37?
Kumho Ecsta LE Sport, 61 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecsta LE Sport or Ecsta XT KU37?
Kumho Ecsta LE Sport, 62 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecsta LE Sport or Ecsta XT KU37?
Kumho Ecsta LE Sport, 60 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology