Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 10 reviews
Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Kumho Ecsta XT KU37 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 vs Kumho Ecsta XT KU37 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Ecsta XS KU36 is ahead, 69–55
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 11 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
Ecsta XS KU36 +1755Why this score
Source Ecsta XS KU36 Ecsta XT KU37 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 73 48 Ecsta XS KU36: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.4 = 72
Ecsta XT KU37: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 48.2 = 55
No road tests of dry for Ecsta XS KU36. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Ecsta XT KU37. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
70
Wet
Ecsta XS KU36 +1456Why this score
Source Ecsta XS KU36 Ecsta XT KU37 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 69 51 Ecsta XS KU36: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 70
Ecsta XT KU37: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 51.1 = 56
No road tests of wet for Ecsta XS KU36. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Ecsta XT KU37. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
61
Comfort
Ecsta XS KU36 +556Why this score
Source Ecsta XS KU36 Ecsta XT KU37 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 58 49 Ecsta XS KU36: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 57.5 = 61
Ecsta XT KU37: 40% × 65.5 (est.) + 60% × 49.4 = 56
No road tests of comfort for Ecsta XS KU36 or Ecsta XT KU37. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
Ecsta XS KU36 +955Why this score
Source Ecsta XS KU36 Ecsta XT KU37 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 63 48 Ecsta XS KU36: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 64
Ecsta XT KU37: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 47.7 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta XS KU36. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta XT KU37. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
71
Handling (owners)
Ecsta XS KU36 +2447Why this score
Source Ecsta XS KU36 Ecsta XT KU37 Reviews found online 71 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 | Kumho Ecsta XT KU37 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 55 |
| Dry | 72 | 55 |
| Wet | 70 | 56 |
| Comfort | 61 | 56 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ecsta XS KU36
Ecsta XT KU37
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecsta XS KU36
Pros
- Exceptional dry surface grip and cornering confidence
- Strong, rigid sidewall construction
- High value-to-performance ratio
Cons
- High levels of road noise that tend to worsen over time
- Lack of steering precision and on-center feel
- Rapid tread wear consistent with aggressive performance compounds
Tire B Ecsta XT KU37
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Low road noise levels
- Good dry-weather stability and cornering
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather grip and confidence
- Lack of steering feedback and road feel
- Tendency to lose traction under hard acceleration
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 | B · Kumho Ecsta XT KU37 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho Ecsta XS KU36
Kumho Ecsta XT KU37
Winner: Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Kumho Ecsta XT KU37 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 scores 71 vs 47 on handling.
Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 scores 72 vs 55 on dry.
Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 scores 70 vs 56 on wet.
Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 scores 64 vs 55 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecsta XS KU36 or Ecsta XT KU37?
Which is better in the wet, Ecsta XS KU36 or Ecsta XT KU37?
Kumho Ecsta XS KU36, 70 vs 56 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta XS KU36 or Ecsta XT KU37?
Kumho Ecsta XS KU36, 72 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecsta XS KU36 or Ecsta XT KU37?
Kumho Ecsta XS KU36, 61 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecsta XS KU36 or Ecsta XT KU37?
Kumho Ecsta XS KU36, 64 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology