Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta KU19 vs Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 8 + 5,009 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport All Season 4 is ahead, 80–74

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta KU19
Tire AKumho

Ecsta KU19

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 8 reviews

Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4
± 5

Tests 77 · 3 tests Owners 80 · 5,009 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test (snow braking)

“I just switched from the Pilot Sport All Season 4 to the Continental DWS 06 Plus, and the contis are WAY quieter and ride so much smoother than the Michelins. Hopefully they'll last longer too, the Michelins only lasted me about 28k~ miles despite regularly rotating them.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Pilot Sport All Season 4 +10
    83
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta KU19Pilot Sport All Season 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 71 (est.)79
    Reviews found online7589

    Ecsta KU19: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 73

    Pilot Sport All Season 4: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 88.7 = 83

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta KU19. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 76

    Wet

    Pilot Sport All Season 4 +8
    84
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta KU19Pilot Sport All Season 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 75 (est.)81
    Reviews found online7889

    Ecsta KU19: 60% × 74.7 (est.) + 40% × 78 = 76

    Pilot Sport All Season 4: 60% × 81.1 + 40% × 89.4 = 84

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta KU19. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    76
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta KU19Pilot Sport All Season 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–84
    Reviews found online–64

    Pilot Sport All Season 4: 60% × 84.4 + 40% × 64.4 = 76

  4. 74

    Comfort

    Ecsta KU19 +1
    73
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta KU19Pilot Sport All Season 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 70 (est.)69
    Reviews found online7777

    Ecsta KU19: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 76.5 = 74

    Pilot Sport All Season 4: 40% × 68.8 + 60% × 76.5 = 73

    No road tests of comfort for Ecsta KU19. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta KU19Pilot Sport All Season 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests–55
    Reviews found online–79

    Pilot Sport All Season 4: 60% × 54.9 + 40% × 79 = 65

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport All Season 4 +1
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta KU19Pilot Sport All Season 4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7172

    Ecsta KU19: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 69

    Pilot Sport All Season 4: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta KU19. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport All Season 4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 78

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport All Season 4 +4
    82
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta KU19Pilot Sport All Season 4
    Reviews found online7882
Scores at a glance
Kumho Ecsta KU19 vs Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta KU19Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4
Relative Score 74 80
Dry 73 83
Wet 76 84
Snow – 76
Comfort 74 73
Noise – 65
Treadwear 69 70
Handling (owners) 78 82

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Ecsta KU19

± 5

Pilot Sport All Season 4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta KU19

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry grip performance
  • Superior noise suppression at highway speeds
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Softer sidewall construction may not suit all driving styles
  • Limited long-term tread life data available from current user reports
  • Potential for inconsistent handling feel if mixed with stiffer-sidewall tires on the same axle
All owner themes in the Ecsta KU19 review

Tire B Pilot Sport All Season 4

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in both wet and dry weather conditions
  • Noticeable improvement in ride comfort, responsiveness, and smoothness compared to OEM run-flat tires
  • Strong braking performance and resistance to hydroplaning in heavy rain

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected treadwear, particularly on performance vehicles or staggered setups
  • Noticeable road noise, humming, or cavity resonance at highway speeds for some users
  • Firm sidewalls can transmit sharper impacts over rough roads and potholes
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport All Season 4 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Ecsta KU19

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4

Positive

Community sentiment for the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 is predominantly positive, with drivers praising its dry and wet grip, responsive handling, and substantial upgrade over stock tires. However, several users report drawbacks including mediocre deep snow performance, noticeable road noise or ride stiffness compared to competitors like the Continental DWS 06 Plus, and an efficiency or range penalty on electric vehicles.

r/WRX ·2 upvotes ·2021-05-01

“Im running pilot sport a/s4 in 265/35 r18 on 18x9.5 konig ampliform. I have been driving them about 5 months, i cant complain. They are good for where im at (only 93 octane stage 1 tune, no major mods). Side note, i feel the road imperfections alot more with such a small sidewall.”

impreza5.com ·2 upvotes ·2025-07-06

“I just replaced my Michelin Pilot Sport AS4 that I had on my Impreza with the Michelin CC2s. I got 30k out of the PSAS4 tires, and neither the tire shop nor Michelin would honor the 45k warranty, even with regular rotations and even wear. I was not impressed with them in the snow, and I've had about 30 winters of driving with different all seasons. The CC2, on the other hand, were incredible. Such a good tire in my first winter that I bought a set for my daughter's Forester. A little noisier than the PSAS4s, but I'll take superior handling on ice/snow over the quieter tire.”

r/TeslaModelY ·52 upvotes ·2023-02-26

“Replaced tires with Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, ride significantly improved My 2021 MYLR with 19" Gemini wheels ran over a screw in the tire sidewall and I had to replace the tire. I decided to replace all four tires since the tread was low anyway. I ended up replacing with the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4. I was happy to find that the ride quality significantly improved after this. Just wanted to let folks know. Others have pointed out that there's a slight range efficiency hit and the tires don't reach all the way to the Gemini rims like the stock Continentals do. I find I don't care about these things and enjoy the ride quality improvement a lot. If I put the car in Chill mode now and drive others around, it's a much better ride experience for them on residential streets. The tires were a bit expensive, $1700 to replace all four including labor (in the SF Bay, a HCOL area) but I had to replace the tires anyway and the benefits were worth it to me.”

Top themes
#wet and dry grip#winter and snow capability#EV efficiency and range#Continental DWS06 Plus comparison#CrossClimate 2 comparison#road noise and ride comfort#tread life and wear

Based on 241 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta KU19 B · Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available13
Rim diameters18″20″
Tread depth—9 - 10/32″
UTQG—440 - 540 A - AA A
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta KU19

Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 — better dry and wet. Where the Kumho Ecsta KU19 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Kumho Ecsta KU19 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 scores 83 vs 73 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 scores 84 vs 76 on wet.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta KU19
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecsta KU19 or Pilot Sport All Season 4?

Which is better in the wet, Ecsta KU19 or Pilot Sport All Season 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, 84 vs 76 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta KU19 or Pilot Sport All Season 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, 83 vs 73 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecsta KU19 or Pilot Sport All Season 4?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 73 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Ecsta KU19 or Pilot Sport All Season 4?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 70 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology