tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta KU19 vs Yokohama AVID TOURING-S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 85 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta KU19 is ahead, 73–68

Check price on Amazon · Ecsta KU19 or AVID TOURING-S on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta KU19
Tire AKumho

Ecsta KU19

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 8 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Ecsta KU19 +6
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta KU19AVID TOURING-S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7566

    Ecsta KU19: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 73

    AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 67

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta KU19. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 76

    Wet

    Ecsta KU19 +8
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta KU19AVID TOURING-S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 75 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7867

    Ecsta KU19: 60% × 74.7 (est.) + 40% × 78 = 76

    AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta KU19. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    63
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta KU19AVID TOURING-S
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–58

    AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 63

    No road tests of snow for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 74

    Comfort

    Ecsta KU19 +8
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta KU19AVID TOURING-S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7765

    Ecsta KU19: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 76.5 = 74

    AVID TOURING-S: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.4 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for Ecsta KU19. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta KU19AVID TOURING-S
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–68

    AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 67

    No road tests of noise for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    Level
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta KU19AVID TOURING-S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7170

    Ecsta KU19: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 69

    AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta KU19. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 78

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta KU19AVID TOURING-S
    Reviews found online78–
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Ecsta KU19Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
Relative Score 73 68
Dry 73 67
Wet 76 68
Snow – 63
Comfort 74 66
Noise – 67
Treadwear 69 69
Handling (owners) 78 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Ecsta KU19

± 8

AVID TOURING-S

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta KU19

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry grip performance
  • Superior noise suppression at highway speeds
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Softer sidewall construction may not suit all driving styles
  • Limited long-term tread life data available from current user reports
  • Potential for inconsistent handling feel if mixed with stiffer-sidewall tires on the same axle
All owner themes in the Ecsta KU19 review

Tire B AVID TOURING-S

Pros

  • Good value: many reviewers cite a low price relative to quality and describe it as a credible, cheaper alternative to Michelin and other name brands.
  • Quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride, mentioned very frequently, including by reviewers who expected a loud tire.
  • Long tread life: reports include about 65,000 miles on a Subaru Outback, about 80,000 miles per set over three sets, and minimal wear after 5,000 to 10,000 miles.

Cons

  • Some reviewers report wheelspin or weak traction when starting from a stop in wet or snowy conditions.
  • Noise is mentioned by several reviewers, including tread growl, a louder tire than their previous set, and a tire described as 'so noisy'.
  • Soft sidewall or tire feel: one reviewer described vague steering and flexing, another called the tire 'soft' and noted tracking in pavement grooves on some highways.
All owner themes in the AVID TOURING-S review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta KU19 B · Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available128
Rim diameters18″15″ – 17″
Tread depth—11/32″
UTQG—620 A B
Treadwear warranty—80,000 mi
Sidewall—Whitewall

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta KU19

Yokohama AVID TOURING-S

Winner: Kumho Ecsta KU19 — better wet, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Kumho Ecsta KU19 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta KU19 scores 76 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Ecsta KU19 scores 74 vs 66 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta KU19 scores 73 vs 67 on dry.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta KU19
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecsta KU19 or AVID TOURING-S?

Which is better in the wet, Ecsta KU19 or AVID TOURING-S?

Kumho Ecsta KU19, 76 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta KU19 or AVID TOURING-S?

Kumho Ecsta KU19, 73 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecsta KU19 or AVID TOURING-S?

Kumho Ecsta KU19, 74 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecsta KU19 or AVID TOURING-S?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 69 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology