Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 85 reviews
Yokohama AVID TOURING-S vs Goodyear Assurance All-Season — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 85 + 51 owner reviews. How we score
AVID TOURING-S is ahead, 67–61
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 51 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
AVID TOURING-S +661Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Assurance All-Season Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 66 58 AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 67
Assurance All-Season: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 57.8 = 61
No road tests of dry for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Assurance All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
68
Wet
AVID TOURING-S +464Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Assurance All-Season Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 67 61 AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 68
Assurance All-Season: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.8 = 64
No road tests of wet for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Assurance All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
63
Snow
AVID TOURING-S +756Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Assurance All-Season Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 58 46 AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 58.1 = 63
Assurance All-Season: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.8 = 56
No road tests of snow for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Assurance All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
66
Comfort
AVID TOURING-S +561Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Assurance All-Season Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 65 58 AVID TOURING-S: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 65.4 = 66
Assurance All-Season: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 58 = 61
No road tests of comfort for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Assurance All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Noise
AVID TOURING-S +265Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Assurance All-Season Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 68 64 AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 67
Assurance All-Season: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 65
No road tests of noise for AVID TOURING-S or Assurance All-Season. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Treadwear
AVID TOURING-S +960Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Assurance All-Season Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 70 57 AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 69
Assurance All-Season: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 56.5 = 60
No road tests of treadwear for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Assurance All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison54Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Assurance All-Season Reviews found online – 54
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama AVID TOURING-S | Goodyear Assurance All-Season |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 61 |
| Dry | 67 | 61 |
| Wet | 68 | 64 |
| Snow | 63 | 56 |
| Comfort | 66 | 61 |
| Noise | 67 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 60 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 54 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
AVID TOURING-S
Assurance All-Season
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A AVID TOURING-S
Pros
- Good value: many reviewers cite a low price relative to quality and describe it as a credible, cheaper alternative to Michelin and other name brands.
- Quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride, mentioned very frequently, including by reviewers who expected a loud tire.
- Long tread life: reports include about 65,000 miles on a Subaru Outback, about 80,000 miles per set over three sets, and minimal wear after 5,000 to 10,000 miles.
Cons
- Some reviewers report wheelspin or weak traction when starting from a stop in wet or snowy conditions.
- Noise is mentioned by several reviewers, including tread growl, a louder tire than their previous set, and a tire described as 'so noisy'.
- Soft sidewall or tire feel: one reviewer described vague steering and flexing, another called the tire 'soft' and noted tracking in pavement grooves on some highways.
Tire B Assurance All-Season
Pros
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
- Excellent value for the price point
- Reliable dry and wet weather traction for non-aggressive drivers
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear well before the warranty limit
- Poor performance in winter conditions, specifically on ice and deep snow
- Occasional reports of vibration and balance issues immediately after installation
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama AVID TOURING-S | B · Goodyear Assurance All-Season |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 28 | 51 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 17″ | 14″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 620 A B | 600 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Whitewall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 23 | 23 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
Goodyear Assurance All-Season
Winner: Yokohama AVID TOURING-S — better treadwear, snow and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama AVID TOURING-S scores 69 vs 60 on treadwear.
Yokohama AVID TOURING-S scores 63 vs 56 on snow.
Yokohama AVID TOURING-S scores 67 vs 61 on dry.
Yokohama AVID TOURING-S scores 66 vs 61 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
AVID TOURING-S or Assurance All-Season?
Which is better in the wet, AVID TOURING-S or Assurance All-Season?
Yokohama AVID TOURING-S, 68 vs 64 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, AVID TOURING-S or Assurance All-Season?
Yokohama AVID TOURING-S, 67 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, AVID TOURING-S or Assurance All-Season?
Yokohama AVID TOURING-S, 63 vs 56 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, AVID TOURING-S or Assurance All-Season?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, AVID TOURING-S or Assurance All-Season?
Yokohama AVID TOURING-S, 66 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, AVID TOURING-S or Assurance All-Season?
Yokohama AVID TOURING-S, 69 vs 60 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology