Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 23 reviews
Kumho Ecsta PA31 vs Michelin Defender T+H — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Defender T+H is ahead, 72–61
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 71 · 1 review
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
61
Dry
Defender T+H +1172Why this score
Source Ecsta PA31 Defender T+H Reviews found online 57 74 -
66
Wet
Defender T+H +874Why this score
Source Ecsta PA31 Defender T+H Reviews found online 64 75 -
59
Snow
Defender T+H +766Why this score
Source Ecsta PA31 Defender T+H Reviews found online 53 64 -
61
Comfort
Defender T+H +970Why this score
Source Ecsta PA31 Defender T+H Reviews found online 54 70 -
66
Noise
Defender T+H +268Why this score
Source Ecsta PA31 Defender T+H Reviews found online 65 70 -
59
Treadwear
Defender T+H +1473Why this score
Source Ecsta PA31 Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) – 75 Reviews found online 55 70 -
53
Handling
Defender T+H +1972Why this score
Source Ecsta PA31 Defender T+H Reviews found online 53 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta PA31 | Michelin Defender T+H |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 72 |
| Dry | 61 | 72 |
| Wet | 66 | 74 |
| Snow | 59 | 66 |
| Comfort | 61 | 70 |
| Noise | 66 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 59 | 73 |
| Handling | 53 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ecsta PA31
Defender T+H
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecsta PA31
Pros
- Affordable price and high overall value
- Smooth and quiet ride quality
- Strong wet-weather grip and confidence
Cons
- Tendency to develop temporary flat spots when parked for a few days
- Occasional durability issues such as sidewall bubbles reported by some users
- Not intended for high-performance track use or extreme grip
Tire B Defender T+H
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta PA31 | B · Michelin Defender T+H |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Ultra High Performance tires | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 7 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | — |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 500 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho Ecsta PA31
Michelin Defender T+H
Winner: Michelin Defender T+H — better handling, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Defender T+H scores 72 vs 53 on handling.
Michelin Defender T+H scores 73 vs 59 on treadwear.
Michelin Defender T+H scores 72 vs 61 on dry.
Michelin Defender T+H scores 70 vs 61 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.