Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 165 reviews
Best test result: #7 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (overall ranking)
Head-to-head
Updated
Kumho Ecsta PA51 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Ecsta PA51 leads, 68–67 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 68 · 3 tests Owners 66 · 13 reviews
Best test result: #5 of 10 in 2015 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test (overall ranking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Level68Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 Kinergy 4S Professional tests (TWG score) – 70 Reviews found online 68 65 -
68
Wet
Kinergy 4S +472Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 Kinergy 4S Professional tests (TWG score) – 74 Reviews found online 68 69 -
62
Snow
Kinergy 4S +769Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 Kinergy 4S Professional tests (TWG score) – 66 Reviews found online 57 73 -
66
Comfort
Kinergy 4S +268Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 Kinergy 4S Reviews found online 63 67 -
69
Noise
Ecsta PA51 +861Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 Kinergy 4S Professional tests (TWG score) – 57 Reviews found online 72 – -
71
Treadwear
Ecsta PA51 +863Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 Kinergy 4S Professional tests (TWG score) 70 62 Reviews found online 72 63 -
66
Handling
Ecsta PA51 +363Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 Kinergy 4S Reviews found online 66 63
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta PA51 | Hankook Kinergy 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 67 |
| Dry | 68 | 68 |
| Wet | 68 | 72 |
| Snow | 62 | 69 |
| Comfort | 66 | 68 |
| Noise | 69 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 63 |
| Handling | 66 | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
68
/ 100
Ecsta PA51
67
/ 100
Kinergy 4S
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Ecsta PA51 | Kinergy 4S | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 67% #7/19 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires | 20% #5/10 · 2015 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | +46.7 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecsta PA51
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- Strong dry pavement traction and cornering grip
- Quiet and smooth ride quality
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in heavy rain or standing water
- Some reports of increased road noise over time
- Limited availability in certain niche sizes
Tire B Kinergy 4S
Pros
- Exceptional grip and stability in wet and torrential rain conditions
- Strong performance in snow and slush, often cited as a viable alternative to dedicated winter tires
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and shorter-than-expected service life
- Inconsistent dry-road handling and feedback compared to dedicated summer tires
- Occasional reports of poor traction on greasy or specific wet road surfaces
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta PA51 | B · Hankook Kinergy 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 13 | 67 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 19″ | 13″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 10.5/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 500 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 45,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
68
/ 100
Kumho Ecsta PA51
67
/ 100
Hankook Kinergy 4S
Too close to call: Kumho Ecsta PA51 and Hankook Kinergy 4S are within 2 points overall. Kumho Ecsta PA51 is stronger on noise, treadwear and handling. Hankook Kinergy 4S is stronger on snow and wet.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 69 vs 61 on noise.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 71 vs 63 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 69 vs 62 on snow.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 72 vs 68 on wet.
Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PA51
Tire B · Hankook Kinergy 4S
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.