Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 11 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Kumho Ecsta V720 vs Yokohama ADVAN A052 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 5 road tests and 11 + 213 owner reviews. How we score
ADVAN A052 is ahead, 72–61
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 76 · 5 tests Owners 68 · 213 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))
“Staggered BBSs Need Tires I have a set of BBS wheels that i have been restoring for my 89 944 NA. I am trying to figure out what tires to get and am running into a bit of trouble. The set of BBSs are 15in staggered. The front are 8in wide and the rear are 9in wide. When i had purchased these wheels they had 215/60R15s all around. Would this be a good fitment? I am hoping the rear will not look stretched. As i was researching staggered tires i ran into problems finding a matching set in the sizes 225 50R15 and 205 55R15. A local shop helped me find these for the front Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 (205 55R15) and these for the rear Yokohama ADVAN A052 (225 50R15). Im concerned to get these due to the tread pattern being drastically different. Another shop has Kumho Ecsta 4x KU22 picked out for the front. I would like to have performance summer tires that do not break the bank. If i were to do 215/60R15s all around i was looking at Falken Sincera SN250 A/S (which are not performance) or Vredestein Sprint Classic which i am not sure of. I am a bit at a loss here and would greatly appreciate any advice or help selecting tires as this is not something i am comfortable with given the lack of options at this wheel size.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
ADVAN A052 +1180Why this score
Source Ecsta V720 ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 70 90 Ecsta V720: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 69
ADVAN A052: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 89.9 = 80
No road tests of dry for Ecsta V720. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
59
Wet
ADVAN A052 +1473Why this score
Source Ecsta V720 ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 62 (est.) 78 Reviews found online 54 67 Ecsta V720: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 59
ADVAN A052: 60% × 77.8 + 40% × 67 = 73
No road tests of wet for Ecsta V720. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison73Why this score
Source Ecsta V720 ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online – 74 ADVAN A052: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 73
No road tests of snow for ADVAN A052. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
51
Comfort
ADVAN A052 +1667Why this score
Source Ecsta V720 ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 42 63 Ecsta V720: 40% × 63.3 (est.) + 60% × 42.2 = 51
ADVAN A052: 40% × 74.1 + 60% × 62.6 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Ecsta V720. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison77Why this score
Source Ecsta V720 ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 77 Reviews found online – 77 ADVAN A052: 60% × 76.8 + 40% × 76.5 = 77
-
50
Treadwear
Level50Why this score
Source Ecsta V720 ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) ≈ 57 (est.) Reviews found online 40 40 Ecsta V720: 60% × 56.9 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 50
ADVAN A052: 60% × 56.8 (est.) + 40% × 39.5 = 50
No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta V720. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN A052. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
72
Handling (owners)
ADVAN A052 +1284Why this score
Source Ecsta V720 ADVAN A052 Reviews found online 72 84
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta V720 | Yokohama ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 72 |
| Dry | 69 | 80 |
| Wet | 59 | 73 |
| Snow | – | 73 |
| Comfort | 51 | 67 |
| Noise | – | 77 |
| Treadwear | 50 | 50 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 84 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
61
/ 100
Ecsta V720
72
/ 100
ADVAN A052
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecsta V720
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and traction for high-horsepower vehicles
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- Precise steering feedback and firm sidewall construction
Cons
- High levels of road noise
- Rapid tread wear
- Inconsistent wet weather performance, with some reports of hydroplaning
Tire B ADVAN A052
Pros
- Class-leading dry grip and traction, often compared to dedicated racing slicks.
- Rapid warm-up time, providing peak performance almost immediately.
- Surprisingly high levels of wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance for a performance tire.
Cons
- Rapid tread wear, especially when used on heavy vehicles or without aggressive camber settings.
- Tendency to 'grease up' or lose performance during long, high-intensity track sessions.
- Soft sidewall construction can lead to vague steering feel or 'sponginess' compared to stiffer competitors.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Kumho Ecsta V720
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Yokohama ADVAN A052
The community regards the Yokohama ADVAN A052 as a top-tier, high-performance competition tire that offers exceptional dry grip and competitive edge in autocross and track settings. Users frequently compare them favorably against other extreme performance tires like the Bridgestone RE-71R/RE-71RS, though questions remain regarding their longevity for long-distance road trips.
r/tires
·2 upvotes ·2023-07-04
“Long trip with Advans A052? I'm planning a trip to the Nürburgring to attend a trackday this October. The problem is that I live 1300 km away, so the tyres should be able to cope with that, some 20 laps at medium-fast pace at the Nordschleife, and the drive back home. Are the Advan A052 tyres way to soft for such a long trip? Will they last? Wouldn't it be wiser to settle for a more conservative set of Michelins PS4? The car is a 1986 Porsche 911 Carrera, 1210 kg... Read more”
northamericanmotoring.com
“I went with Yokohama ADVAN A052 225/45/17s for AUTOx They are more expensive but they are definitely lighter than the N2s...20.6#s vs ~25#s from what I found on the internet.”
r/tires
·9 upvotes ·2020-01-18
“Yokohama ADVAN A052 315/30R18 and 265/35R18 - BEEFY!”
Top themes
#exceptional dry grip#autocross and track performance#tire longevity and wear#comparison with bridgestone#tire sizing and fitment
Based on 12 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta V720 | B · Yokohama ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 61 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 7/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
61
/ 100
Kumho Ecsta V720
72
/ 100
Yokohama ADVAN A052
Winner: Yokohama ADVAN A052 — better comfort, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Kumho Ecsta V720 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 67 vs 51 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 73 vs 59 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 84 vs 72 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 80 vs 69 on dry.
Tire A · Kumho Ecsta V720
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN A052
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecsta V720 or ADVAN A052?
Which is better in the wet, Ecsta V720 or ADVAN A052?
Yokohama ADVAN A052, 73 vs 59 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta V720 or ADVAN A052?
Yokohama ADVAN A052, 80 vs 69 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecsta V720 or ADVAN A052?
Yokohama ADVAN A052, 67 vs 51 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecsta V720 or ADVAN A052?
Neither, by our numbers: 50 vs 50 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology