Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 vs Toyo R888 R — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 10 + 30 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta XS KU36 is ahead, 69–63

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta XS KU36
Tire AKumho

Ecsta XS KU36

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 10 reviews

Toyo R888 R
Tire BToyo

R888 R

Summer

± 7

Tests 64 · 2 tests Owners 60 · 30 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 10 in 2017 Sport Auto UHP and Track Day Test (dry handling)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    R888 R +3
    75
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta XS KU36R888 R
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 70 (est.)76
    Reviews found online7372

    Ecsta XS KU36: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.4 = 72

    R888 R: 60% × 76.4 + 40% × 72.3 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta XS KU36. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 70

    Wet

    Ecsta XS KU36 +15
    55
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta XS KU36R888 R
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 70 (est.)52
    Reviews found online6960

    Ecsta XS KU36: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 70

    R888 R: 60% × 52.3 + 40% × 59.9 = 55

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta XS KU36. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 61

    Comfort

    Ecsta XS KU36 +3
    58
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta XS KU36R888 R
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5853

    Ecsta XS KU36: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 57.5 = 61

    R888 R: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 53.3 = 58

    No road tests of comfort for Ecsta XS KU36 or R888 R. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 64

    Treadwear

    Ecsta XS KU36 +10
    54
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta XS KU36R888 R
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online6347

    Ecsta XS KU36: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 64

    R888 R: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 46.5 = 54

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta XS KU36. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for R888 R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  5. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Level
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta XS KU36R888 R
    Reviews found online7171
Scores at a glance
Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 vs Toyo R888 R: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta XS KU36Toyo R888 R
Relative Score 69 63
Dry 72 75
Wet 70 55
Comfort 61 58
Treadwear 64 54
Handling (owners) 71 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Ecsta XS KU36

± 7

R888 R

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta XS KU36

Pros

  • Exceptional dry surface grip and cornering confidence
  • Strong, rigid sidewall construction
  • High value-to-performance ratio

Cons

  • High levels of road noise that tend to worsen over time
  • Lack of steering precision and on-center feel
  • Rapid tread wear consistent with aggressive performance compounds
All owner themes in the Ecsta XS KU36 review

Tire B R888 R

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and cornering stability
  • Sharp, communicative steering feedback
  • Strong, stiff sidewall construction

Cons

  • High levels of road noise, particularly at highway speeds
  • Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Poor performance and potential for aquaplaning in standing water
All owner themes in the R888 R review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 B · Toyo R888 R
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—45
Rim diameters—13″ – 20″

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta XS KU36

Toyo R888 R

Winner: Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 — better wet, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Toyo R888 R if dry matters most to you. Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 scores 70 vs 55 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 scores 64 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 scores 61 vs 58 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo R888 R scores 75 vs 72 on dry.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta XS KU36
Tire B · Toyo R888 R

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecsta XS KU36 or R888 R?

Which is better in the wet, Ecsta XS KU36 or R888 R?

Kumho Ecsta XS KU36, 70 vs 55 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta XS KU36 or R888 R?

Toyo R888 R, 75 vs 72 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecsta XS KU36 or R888 R?

Kumho Ecsta XS KU36, 61 vs 58 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecsta XS KU36 or R888 R?

Kumho Ecsta XS KU36, 64 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology