Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 434 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Kumho KL33 vs Nexen N Blue HD — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
KL33 leads, 60–57 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
60
Dry
KL33 +357Why this score
Source KL33 N Blue HD Reviews found online 56 51 -
63
Wet
Level63Why this score
Source KL33 N Blue HD Reviews found online 61 61 -
65
Comfort
KL33 +758Why this score
Source KL33 N Blue HD Reviews found online 61 47 -
57
Treadwear
KL33 +156Why this score
Source KL33 N Blue HD Reviews found online 51 49 -
58
Handling
KL33 +850Why this score
Source KL33 N Blue HD Reviews found online 58 50
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho KL33 | Nexen N Blue HD |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 60 | 57 |
| Dry | 60 | 57 |
| Wet | 63 | 63 |
| Comfort | 65 | 58 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 56 |
| Handling | 58 | 50 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
60
/ 100
KL33
57
/ 100
N Blue HD
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A KL33
Pros
- Good value for money with competitive pricing
- Strong initial dry and wet grip/traction
- Comfortable and smooth ride quality
Cons
- Premature tread wear and short lifespan
- Serious structural concerns including tread chipping, chunking, and delamination
- Road noise increases significantly as the tire wears down
Tire B N Blue HD
Pros
- Good initial wet and dry grip when new
- Attractive budget-friendly price point
- Decent fuel economy and highway stability early in their lifecycle
Cons
- Significant increase in road noise as the tires wear down
- Rapid degradation of grip in wet and dry conditions after initial mileage
- Shorter than expected tread life, especially on front axles
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho KL33 | B · Nexen N Blue HD |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 18 | 5 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 15″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
60
/ 100
Kumho KL33
57
/ 100
Nexen N Blue HD
Winner: Kumho KL33 — better handling, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho KL33 scores 58 vs 50 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho KL33 scores 65 vs 58 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho KL33 scores 60 vs 57 on dry.
Tire A · Kumho KL33
Tire B · Nexen N Blue HD
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.