Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 40 reviews
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Kumho KL33 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
ContiMaxContact MC6 is ahead, 71–60
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1460Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 KL33 Reviews found online 77 56 -
72
Wet
ContiMaxContact MC6 +864Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 KL33 Reviews found online 73 61 -
70
Comfort
ContiMaxContact MC6 +565Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 KL33 Reviews found online 70 61 -
65
Treadwear
ContiMaxContact MC6 +857Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 KL33 Reviews found online 64 51 -
76
Handling
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1858Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 KL33 Reviews found online 76 58
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | Kumho KL33 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 60 |
| Dry | 74 | 60 |
| Wet | 72 | 64 |
| Comfort | 70 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 57 |
| Handling | 76 | 58 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiMaxContact MC6
KL33
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Direct and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
Tire B KL33
Pros
- Good value for money with competitive pricing
- Strong initial dry and wet grip/traction
- Comfortable and smooth ride quality
Cons
- Premature tread wear and short lifespan
- Serious structural concerns including tread chipping, chunking, and delamination
- Road noise increases significantly as the tire wears down
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | B · Kumho KL33 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 3 | 18 |
| Rim diameters | 19″ – 21″ | 15″ – 20″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Kumho KL33
Winner: Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 76 vs 58 on handling.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 74 vs 60 on dry.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 72 vs 64 on wet.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 65 vs 57 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.