Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 154 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Kumho Road Venture AT51 vs Continental CrossContact LX Sport — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 154 + 562 owner reviews. How we score
Road Venture AT51 is ahead, 67–57
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 562 reviews
“CRV-Hybrid Touring owners, how do you like your OEM tires? I'm a proud new owner of a '26 ST and I have the Continental Cross Contact LX Sport tires on my car. I'm not crazy about them. I'm wondering if I should upgrade to Michelin Defenders or something. Thoughts? The Touring comes with the Continental Cross Contact LX Sport (not to be confused with LX25) or the Michelin Primacy A/S. I sorta wish I would have pushed them to switch me to the Primacy A/S. Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Road Venture AT51 +959Why this score
Source Road Venture AT51 CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 68 55 Road Venture AT51: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.7 = 68
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 59
No road tests of dry for Road Venture AT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
70
Wet
Road Venture AT51 +961Why this score
Source Road Venture AT51 CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 70 57 Road Venture AT51: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57.1 = 61
No road tests of wet for Road Venture AT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
70
Snow
Road Venture AT51 +862Why this score
Source Road Venture AT51 CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 70 57 Road Venture AT51: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 62
No road tests of snow for Road Venture AT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
65
Comfort
Road Venture AT51 +362Why this score
Source Road Venture AT51 CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 63 58 Road Venture AT51: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 63.3 = 65
CrossContact LX Sport: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 58 = 62
No road tests of comfort for Road Venture AT51 or CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Noise
Level64Why this score
Source Road Venture AT51 CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 59 61 Road Venture AT51: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 64
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 64
No road tests of noise for Road Venture AT51 or CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Treadwear
Road Venture AT51 +2239Why this score
Source Road Venture AT51 CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 51 (est.) Reviews found online 58 23 Road Venture AT51: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57.9 = 61
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 50.8 (est.) + 40% × 22.5 = 39
No road tests of treadwear for Road Venture AT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
63
Handling (owners)
Road Venture AT51 +1746Why this score
Source Road Venture AT51 CrossContact LX Sport Reviews found online 63 46
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Road Venture AT51 | Continental CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 57 |
| Dry | 68 | 59 |
| Wet | 70 | 61 |
| Snow | 70 | 62 |
| Comfort | 65 | 62 |
| Noise | 64 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 39 |
| Handling (owners) | 63 | 46 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
67
/ 100
Road Venture AT51
57
/ 100
CrossContact LX Sport
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Road Venture AT51
Pros
- Exceptional value and affordable price point compared to premium competitors
- Impressive traction and confidence in snow and winter conditions
- Quiet and smooth highway ride with minimal road noise for an all-terrain tire
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear for some users under heavy or everyday use
- Poor self-cleaning capabilities in deep or heavy mud
- Reduced wet traction and potential slippage when the tread wears low
Tire B CrossContact LX Sport
Pros
- Low road noise and exceptional cabin comfort
- Strong handling and reliable grip in wet and dry conditions
- Confident performance in light snow and winter weather
Cons
- Disappointing tread life and faster-than-expected wear
- Occasional reports of reduced traction in heavy mud or specific slick conditions
- Higher price point relative to the longevity experienced by some drivers
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Kumho Road Venture AT51
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Continental CrossContact LX Sport
Community opinion on the Continental Cross Contact LX Sport is mixed, with some drivers praising its comfort, balance of control, and low road noise. However, many owners express dissatisfaction with rapid tread wear, flaking or chunking, poor wet traction, and shallow initial tread depth. Several users consider replacing them early with options like Michelin CrossClimate or Defender models.
swedespeed.com
·1 upvote ·2026-03-14
“I'm a fan of the Pirelli Scorpion WeatherActives, picked those over the Cross Climate 2s for my XC90 . Not a fan of the Continental CrossContact LX Sports on the wife's 2025 XC60 . Handling in wet feels like absolute garbage, but can't justify swapping them out just yet, but plan to put the WeatherActives or Cross Climate 3s, that's if they come to the States, on her ride when tread is down. Both vehicles ride on 20" rims. I'm also a fan of Vredsteins Quartrac Pro+ and the Nokian Remedy WRG5. Looks like Nokian's Encompass AW02 are in the same vein as the Cross Climate 2 design.”
mbworld.org
“My tires were over inflated at purchase - with rears on my 2020 GLC 300 SUV showing 41.5 PSi, and the fronts were ~ 38.5 PSI. Checked cold tire pressure around sunrise this morning with temperature around 50 degrees. Using a high quality tire pressure gauge checked all tires this morning - and reduced pressure in all four tires to 35 PSI. Before the ride was ok but a bit stiff. Just curious if anyone is running these 18" tires and what you feel works best for your GLC 300's. I'd like to hear your thoughts & comments re: inflation pressure. 235/60 R 18 Continental Cross Contact LX Sport Tire size Inner fuel door pressurre table”
bobistheoilguy.com
·3 upvotes ·2022-10-17
“A broken screw went partially into the tire tread, cutting one of the metal wires / belts in the casing. The tire is not losing air. I am concerned the damaged wire belt could lead to a tire failure. The open divot, deeper than the tire tread, also concerns me since it can get packed with debris, damage the other intact wire, or open the hole even more or further puncturing it. Tire is 2 years old with 17k miles so it's in great shape. Continental Cross Contact LX Sport 245/50 R20. This is on my wife's Pilot so I want her to have a reliable tire with no possibility of having a failure due to this damage, if that is likely here. What do you guys think?”
Top themes
#premature tread wear#wet weather traction#OEM tire replacement#tire inflation pressure#ride comfort and road noise#EV efficiency comparison
Based on 26 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Road Venture AT51 | B · Continental CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 10 | 39 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 13.5/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 540 A A | 480 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 55,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 65 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
67
/ 100
Kumho Road Venture AT51
57
/ 100
Continental CrossContact LX Sport
Winner: Kumho Road Venture AT51 — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Kumho Road Venture AT51 scores 61 vs 39 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Road Venture AT51 scores 63 vs 46 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho Road Venture AT51 scores 68 vs 59 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho Road Venture AT51 scores 70 vs 61 on wet.
Tire A · Kumho Road Venture AT51
Tire B · Continental CrossContact LX Sport
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Road Venture AT51 or CrossContact LX Sport?
Which is better in the wet, Road Venture AT51 or CrossContact LX Sport?
Kumho Road Venture AT51, 70 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Road Venture AT51 or CrossContact LX Sport?
Kumho Road Venture AT51, 68 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Road Venture AT51 or CrossContact LX Sport?
Kumho Road Venture AT51, 70 vs 62 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Road Venture AT51 or CrossContact LX Sport?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 64 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Road Venture AT51 or CrossContact LX Sport?
Kumho Road Venture AT51, 65 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Road Venture AT51 or CrossContact LX Sport?
Kumho Road Venture AT51, 61 vs 39 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology