tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Solus KH16 vs Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 34 + 67 owner reviews. How we score

Dynapro HP2 RA33 is ahead, 74–60

Check price on Amazon · Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Solus KH16 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Solus KH16
Tire AKumho

Solus KH16

All-Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 34 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 59

    Dry

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +15
    74
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KH16Dynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online5577

    Solus KH16: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.6 = 59

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 72 (est.) + 40% × 77.4 = 74

    No road tests of dry for Solus KH16. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 63

    Wet

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +15
    78
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KH16Dynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 76 (est.)
    Reviews found online6180

    Solus KH16: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 63

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 75.9 (est.) + 40% × 80.1 = 78

    No road tests of wet for Solus KH16. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 55

    Snow

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +14
    69
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KH16Dynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online4567

    Solus KH16: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 45.4 = 55

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 69

    No road tests of snow for Solus KH16. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 63

    Comfort

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +12
    75
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KH16Dynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6078

    Solus KH16: 40% × 67.5 (est.) + 60% × 60.2 = 63

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 77.9 = 75

    No road tests of comfort for Solus KH16 or Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 65

    Noise

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +5
    70
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KH16Dynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6475

    Solus KH16: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 63.7 = 65

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Solus KH16 or Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 58

    Treadwear

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +14
    72
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KH16Dynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5477

    Solus KH16: 60% × 61.7 (est.) + 40% × 53.5 = 58

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 72

    No road tests of treadwear for Solus KH16. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 58

    Handling (owners)

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +16
    74
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KH16Dynapro HP2 RA33
    Reviews found online5874
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Solus KH16Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Relative Score 60 74
Dry 59 74
Wet 63 78
Snow 55 69
Comfort 63 75
Noise 65 70
Treadwear 58 72
Handling (owners) 58 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Solus KH16

± 7

Dynapro HP2 RA33

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Solus KH16

Pros

  • Low noise levels providing a quiet and comfortable ride
  • Good handling and reliable grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Affordable pricing and good overall value compared to original equipment or premium alternatives

Cons

  • Some users reported soft sidewalls causing a vague handling sensation
  • Occasional reports of rapid tread wear or shorter lifespan under specific conditions
  • A few concerns regarding wet weather performance from isolated reviewers
All owner themes in the Solus KH16 review

Tire B Dynapro HP2 RA33

Pros

  • Exceptional value and cost-effectiveness compared to premium brands like Michelin
  • Quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong dry and wet traction under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Occasional road noise or humming sound at higher speeds or on concrete surfaces
  • Potential for faster or average tread wear depending on driving habits and vehicle type
  • Some users reported sketchy wet cornering grip or sliding on roundabouts
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP2 RA33 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Solus KH16 B · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
CategoryAll-SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available249
Rim diameters17″ – 19″15″ – 22″
Tread depth9.5/32″—
UTQG440 A A—
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi65,000 mi
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Solus KH16

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33

Winner: Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 74 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 74 vs 59 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 78 vs 63 on wet.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 69 vs 55 on snow.

Tire A · Kumho Solus KH16
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Solus KH16 or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Which is better in the wet, Solus KH16 or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 78 vs 63 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Solus KH16 or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 74 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Solus KH16 or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 69 vs 55 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Solus KH16 or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 70 vs 65 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Solus KH16 or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 75 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Solus KH16 or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 72 vs 58 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology