Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 34 reviews
Hankook Dynapro M/T looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Kumho Solus KH16 vs Hankook Dynapro M/T — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 34 + 5 owner reviews. How we score
Dynapro M/T is ahead, 66–60
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 5 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
Dynapro M/T +766Why this score
Source Solus KH16 Dynapro M/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 55 65 Solus KH16: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.6 = 59
Dynapro M/T: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 66
No road tests of dry for Solus KH16. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
63
Wet
Dynapro M/T +568Why this score
Source Solus KH16 Dynapro M/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 61 67 Solus KH16: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 63
Dynapro M/T: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68
No road tests of wet for Solus KH16. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
55
Snow
Dynapro M/T +1570Why this score
Source Solus KH16 Dynapro M/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 45 69 Solus KH16: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 45.4 = 55
Dynapro M/T: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 70
No road tests of snow for Solus KH16. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
63
Comfort
Solus KH16 +459Why this score
Source Solus KH16 Dynapro M/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 60 54 Solus KH16: 40% × 67.5 (est.) + 60% × 60.2 = 63
Dynapro M/T: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 53.8 = 59
No road tests of comfort for Solus KH16 or Dynapro M/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Solus KH16 Dynapro M/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 64 – Solus KH16: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 63.7 = 65
No road tests of noise for Solus KH16. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
58
Treadwear
Dynapro M/T +866Why this score
Source Solus KH16 Dynapro M/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 54 66 Solus KH16: 60% × 61.7 (est.) + 40% × 53.5 = 58
Dynapro M/T: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 66 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Solus KH16. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
58
Handling (owners)
Dynapro M/T +361Why this score
Source Solus KH16 Dynapro M/T Reviews found online 58 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Solus KH16 | Hankook Dynapro M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 60 | 66 |
| Dry | 59 | 66 |
| Wet | 63 | 68 |
| Snow | 55 | 70 |
| Comfort | 63 | 59 |
| Noise | 65 | – |
| Treadwear | 58 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 58 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
60
/ 100
Solus KH16
66
/ 100
Dynapro M/T
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Solus KH16
Pros
- Low noise levels providing a quiet and comfortable ride
- Good handling and reliable grip in both wet and dry conditions
- Affordable pricing and good overall value compared to original equipment or premium alternatives
Cons
- Some users reported soft sidewalls causing a vague handling sensation
- Occasional reports of rapid tread wear or shorter lifespan under specific conditions
- A few concerns regarding wet weather performance from isolated reviewers
Tire B Dynapro M/T
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and overall mileage considering heavy use
- Surprisingly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
- Strong dry and off-road traction, often reducing the need for 4WD
Cons
- Severe loss of wet traction and dangerous slip/understeer tendencies as the rubber compound hardens over time
- Prone to slow punctures on the running surface under heavy loads
- Develops uneven wear patterns over extended high-mileage use
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Solus KH16 | B · Hankook Dynapro M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season | Mud-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | 9.5/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 440 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 60,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
60
/ 100
Kumho Solus KH16
66
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro M/T
Winner: Hankook Dynapro M/T — better snow, treadwear and dry. Pick the Kumho Solus KH16 if comfort matters most to you. Hankook Dynapro M/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 70 vs 55 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 66 vs 58 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 66 vs 59 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 68 vs 63 on wet.
Tire A · Kumho Solus KH16
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro M/T
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Solus KH16 or Dynapro M/T?
Which is better in the wet, Solus KH16 or Dynapro M/T?
Hankook Dynapro M/T, 68 vs 63 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Solus KH16 or Dynapro M/T?
Hankook Dynapro M/T, 66 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Solus KH16 or Dynapro M/T?
Hankook Dynapro M/T, 70 vs 55 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Solus KH16 or Dynapro M/T?
Kumho Solus KH16, 63 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Solus KH16 or Dynapro M/T?
Hankook Dynapro M/T, 66 vs 58 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology