Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Solus KU50 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 9 road tests and 5 + 1,377 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport 4 SUV is ahead, 83–72

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Solus KU50
Tire AKumho

Solus KU50

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 5 reviews

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
± 5

Tests 80 · 9 tests Owners 79 · 1,377 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested (wet braking)

“Loving my new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires and Enkei Raijin wheels”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +15
    86
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KU50Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests≈ 70 (est.)86
    Reviews found online7386

    Solus KU50: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 71

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 86.1 + 40% × 85.8 = 86

    No road tests of dry for Solus KU50. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 75

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +16
    91
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KU50Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests≈ 74 (est.)93
    Reviews found online7686

    Solus KU50: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 93.3 + 40% × 86.4 = 91

    No road tests of wet for Solus KU50. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 66

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KU50Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)–
    Reviews found online64–

    Solus KU50: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 63.7 = 66

    No road tests of snow for Solus KU50. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    Solus KU50 +4
    64
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KU50Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 68 (est.)54
    Reviews found online6771

    Solus KU50: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 67.2 = 68

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 40% × 54 + 60% × 70.5 = 64

    No road tests of comfort for Solus KU50. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    58
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KU50Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests–53
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 52.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 58

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +5
    72
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KU50Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)77
    Reviews found online6865

    Solus KU50: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 77 + 40% × 65.3 = 72

    No road tests of treadwear for Solus KU50. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 77

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +6
    83
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KU50Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    Reviews found online7783
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    64
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KU50Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests–64
Scores at a glance
Kumho Solus KU50 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Solus KU50Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Relative Score 72 83
Dry 71 86
Wet 75 91
Snow 66 –
Comfort 68 64
Noise – 58
Treadwear 67 72
Handling (owners) 77 83
Efficiency – 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Solus KU50

± 5

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Solus KU50

Pros

  • Excellent braking performance in dry conditions
  • Reliable traction and safety in wet weather
  • High level of user satisfaction and brand loyalty

Cons

  • Limited long-term tread life data available from current user feedback
  • Lack of diverse vehicle-specific performance reports
All owner themes in the Solus KU50 review

Tire B Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Pros

  • Outstanding grip and safety in both wet and dry conditions
  • Precise steering response and enhanced cornering stability for heavy SUVs
  • Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and overall handling

Cons

  • Higher-than-average purchase price
  • Increased road noise reported by some users as the tread wears down
  • Faster tread wear and shorter mileage lifespan under aggressive driving or heavy vehicle loads
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 4 SUV review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Solus KU50

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Positive

Community members generally praise the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV for its strong grip, handling performance, and SUV-specific design. Users frequently consider it an upgrade over OEM options like the Latitude Sport 3, though some discuss its premium price, summer temperature limitations, and expected tread longevity.

Top themes
#grip and handling#SUV-specific performance#tread life longevity#Latitude Sport 3 comparison#summer tire limitations#premium pricing

Based on 25 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Solus KU50 B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle type—SUV and 4x4
Sizes available165
Rim diameters17″17″ – 23″
UTQG—220 - 320 A - AA A

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Solus KU50

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV — better wet, dry and handling. Pick the Kumho Solus KU50 if comfort matters most to you. Kumho Solus KU50 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 91 vs 75 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 86 vs 71 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 83 vs 77 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 72 vs 67 on treadwear.

Tire A · Kumho Solus KU50
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Solus KU50 or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?

Which is better in the wet, Solus KU50 or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 91 vs 75 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Solus KU50 or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 86 vs 71 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Solus KU50 or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?

Kumho Solus KU50, 68 vs 64 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Solus KU50 or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 72 vs 67 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology