Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 4 reviews
Kumho Solus KU50 vs Nexen N Fera AU5 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Solus KU50 is ahead, 71–56
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 6 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
Solus KU50 +1655Why this score
Source Solus KU50 N Fera AU5 Reviews found online 72 47 -
74
Wet
Solus KU50 +2054Why this score
Source Solus KU50 N Fera AU5 Reviews found online 76 49 -
69
Comfort
Solus KU50 +465Why this score
Source Solus KU50 N Fera AU5 Reviews found online 69 62 -
–
Treadwear
No comparison64Why this score
Source Solus KU50 N Fera AU5 Reviews found online – 63 -
68
Handling
Solus KU50 +1355Why this score
Source Solus KU50 N Fera AU5 Reviews found online 68 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Solus KU50 | Nexen N Fera AU5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 56 |
| Dry | 71 | 55 |
| Wet | 74 | 54 |
| Comfort | 69 | 65 |
| Treadwear | – | 64 |
| Handling | 68 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Solus KU50
N Fera AU5
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Solus KU50
Pros
- Excellent braking performance in dry conditions
- Reliable traction and safety in wet weather
- High level of user satisfaction and brand loyalty
Cons
- Limited long-term tread life data available from current user feedback
- Lack of diverse vehicle-specific performance reports
Tire B N Fera AU5
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and longevity, lasting multiple years of daily commuting
- Very quiet and comfortable ride quality with smooth highway manners
- Soft sidewalls contribute to high comfort levels even at higher tire pressures
Cons
- Softer sidewalls lead to noticeable flex and reduced responsiveness in hard cornering
- Lower dry grip levels compared to more aggressive performance tires like the Nexen N Fera SU1
- Potential for traction loss or wheel spin during wet weather take-offs, particularly on powerful rear-wheel-drive vehicles
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Solus KU50 | B · Nexen N Fera AU5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Touring tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho Solus KU50
Nexen N Fera AU5
Winner: Kumho Solus KU50 — better wet, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Kumho Solus KU50 scores 74 vs 54 on wet.
Kumho Solus KU50 scores 71 vs 55 on dry.
Kumho Solus KU50 scores 68 vs 55 on handling.
Kumho Solus KU50 scores 69 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.