Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Solus KU50 vs Nexen N Fera AU5 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Solus KU50 is ahead, 71–56

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AKumho

Solus KU50

All Season Touring tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 4 reviews

Tire BNexen

N Fera AU5

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    Solus KU50 +16
    55
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KU50N Fera AU5
    Reviews found online7247
  2. 74

    Wet

    Solus KU50 +20
    54
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KU50N Fera AU5
    Reviews found online7649
  3. 69

    Comfort

    Solus KU50 +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KU50N Fera AU5
    Reviews found online6962
  4. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    64
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KU50N Fera AU5
    Reviews found online–63
  5. 68

    Handling

    Solus KU50 +13
    55
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KU50N Fera AU5
    Reviews found online6855
Scores at a glance
Kumho Solus KU50 vs Nexen N Fera AU5: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Solus KU50Nexen N Fera AU5
Relative Score 71 56
Dry 71 55
Wet 74 54
Comfort 69 65
Treadwear – 64
Handling 68 55

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Solus KU50

N Fera AU5

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Solus KU50

Pros

  • Excellent braking performance in dry conditions
  • Reliable traction and safety in wet weather
  • High level of user satisfaction and brand loyalty

Cons

  • Limited long-term tread life data available from current user feedback
  • Lack of diverse vehicle-specific performance reports
All owner themes in the Solus KU50 review

Tire B N Fera AU5

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and longevity, lasting multiple years of daily commuting
  • Very quiet and comfortable ride quality with smooth highway manners
  • Soft sidewalls contribute to high comfort levels even at higher tire pressures

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls lead to noticeable flex and reduced responsiveness in hard cornering
  • Lower dry grip levels compared to more aggressive performance tires like the Nexen N Fera SU1
  • Potential for traction loss or wheel spin during wet weather take-offs, particularly on powerful rear-wheel-drive vehicles
All owner themes in the N Fera AU5 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Solus KU50 B · Nexen N Fera AU5
CategoryAll Season Touring tiresSummer
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Solus KU50

Nexen N Fera AU5

Winner: Kumho Solus KU50 — better wet, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Solus KU50 scores 74 vs 54 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Solus KU50 scores 71 vs 55 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Solus KU50 scores 68 vs 55 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Solus KU50 scores 69 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · Kumho Solus KU50
Tire B · Nexen N Fera AU5

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

71

Leads

Solus KU50

Amazon