Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 59 reviews
Kumho Solus TA11 vs Michelin Energy — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 59 + 42 owner reviews. How we score
Solus TA11 is ahead, 66–60
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
Solus TA11 +955Why this score
Source Solus TA11 Energy Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 62 48 Solus TA11: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.7 = 64
Energy: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.4 = 55
No road tests of dry for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Energy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
68
Wet
Solus TA11 +761Why this score
Source Solus TA11 Energy Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 67 57 Solus TA11: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 68
Energy: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 61
No road tests of wet for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Energy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
59
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Solus TA11 Energy Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) – Reviews found online 52 – Solus TA11: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 59
No road tests of snow for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
66
Comfort
Solus TA11 +165Why this score
Source Solus TA11 Energy Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 63 60 Solus TA11: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 66
Energy: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Solus TA11 or Energy. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Solus TA11 Energy Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 68 – Solus TA11: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.5 = 67
No road tests of noise for Solus TA11. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
Energy +267Why this score
Source Solus TA11 Energy Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 65 67 Solus TA11: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.2 = 65
Energy: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Energy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
63
Handling (owners)
Solus TA11 +1251Why this score
Source Solus TA11 Energy Reviews found online 63 51
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Solus TA11 | Michelin Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 60 |
| Dry | 64 | 55 |
| Wet | 68 | 61 |
| Snow | 59 | – |
| Comfort | 66 | 65 |
| Noise | 67 | – |
| Treadwear | 65 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 63 | 51 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Solus TA11
Energy
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Solus TA11
Pros
- Exceptional value and budget-friendly pricing
- Quiet and comfortable highway ride
- Reliable traction in dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Lack of rigidity or grip for aggressive driving
- Subpar performance in deep snow or severe winter conditions
- Occasional reports of road noise depending on the vehicle or surface
Tire B Energy
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
- Low road noise and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Lack of steering feedback and road feel
- Inconsistent or poor grip in wet conditions
- High price point relative to competitors
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Solus TA11 | B · Michelin Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring All Season tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 18 | — |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 18″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 700 A B | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 75,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho Solus TA11
Michelin Energy
Winner: Kumho Solus TA11 — better handling, dry and wet. Where the Michelin Energy is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Kumho Solus TA11 scores 63 vs 51 on handling.
Kumho Solus TA11 scores 64 vs 55 on dry.
Kumho Solus TA11 scores 68 vs 61 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Solus TA11 or Energy?
Which is better in the wet, Solus TA11 or Energy?
Kumho Solus TA11, 68 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Solus TA11 or Energy?
Kumho Solus TA11, 64 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Solus TA11 or Energy?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Solus TA11 or Energy?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology