Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Solus TA31 vs Nexen N Blue ECO — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 78 + 36 owner reviews. How we score

N Blue ECO is ahead, 66–58

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Solus TA31
Tire AKumho

Solus TA31

All Season

Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 78 reviews

Nexen N Blue ECO
Tire BNexen

N Blue ECO

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 36 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 58

    Dry

    N Blue ECO +8
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31N Blue ECO
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5266

    Solus TA31: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.8 = 58

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66

    No road tests of dry for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 60

    Wet

    N Blue ECO +9
    69
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31N Blue ECO
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5769

    Solus TA31: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 56.8 = 60

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 53

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31N Blue ECO
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)–
    Reviews found online41–

    Solus TA31: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.1 = 53

    No road tests of snow for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 62

    Comfort

    N Blue ECO +4
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31N Blue ECO
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5563

    Solus TA31: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.6 = 62

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for Solus TA31 or N Blue ECO. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 65

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31N Blue ECO
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online61–

    Solus TA31: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.6 = 65

    No road tests of noise for Solus TA31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 57

    Treadwear

    N Blue ECO +3
    60
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31N Blue ECO
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online5256

    Solus TA31: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.7 = 57

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 60

    No road tests of treadwear for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 51

    Handling (owners)

    N Blue ECO +15
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31N Blue ECO
    Reviews found online5166
Scores at a glance
Kumho Solus TA31 vs Nexen N Blue ECO: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Solus TA31Nexen N Blue ECO
Relative Score 58 66
Dry 58 66
Wet 60 69
Snow 53 –
Comfort 62 66
Noise 65 –
Treadwear 57 60
Handling (owners) 51 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Solus TA31

N Blue ECO

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Solus TA31

Pros

  • Exceptional value and budget-friendly pricing
  • Very low road noise and a comfortable, smooth ride
  • Good dry and wet traction for everyday commuting

Cons

  • Poor performance in snow and ice conditions
  • Soft sidewalls leading to reduced high-speed stability and less sharp handling
  • Inconsistent tread wear reported by some users, leading to premature replacement
All owner themes in the Solus TA31 review

Tire B N Blue ECO

Pros

  • Excellent value for money and budget-friendly purchase price
  • Strong grip and handling in both wet and dry conditions
  • Good ride comfort and relatively low road noise

Cons

  • Rapid or uneven tread wear reported by several users
  • Premature rubber cracking and perishing observed over time
  • Polarizing opinions on wet weather traction and braking distance
All owner themes in the N Blue ECO review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Solus TA31 B · Nexen N Blue ECO
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2224
Rim diameters15″ – 20″13″ – 16″
Tread depth9.5/32″—
UTQG500 A A—
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—
Sizes in common55

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Solus TA31

Nexen N Blue ECO

Winner: Nexen N Blue ECO — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen N Blue ECO scores 66 vs 51 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen N Blue ECO scores 69 vs 60 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Nexen N Blue ECO scores 66 vs 58 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N Blue ECO scores 66 vs 62 on comfort.

Tire A · Kumho Solus TA31
Tire B · Nexen N Blue ECO

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Solus TA31 or N Blue ECO?

Which is better in the wet, Solus TA31 or N Blue ECO?

Nexen N Blue ECO, 69 vs 60 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Solus TA31 or N Blue ECO?

Nexen N Blue ECO, 66 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Solus TA31 or N Blue ECO?

Nexen N Blue ECO, 66 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Solus TA31 or N Blue ECO?

Nexen N Blue ECO, 60 vs 57 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology