Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 21 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Kumho V70a vs Yokohama Advan A10 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
V70a is ahead, 70–55
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
78
Dry
V70a +1860Why this score
Source V70a Advan A10 Reviews found online 84 55 -
72
Wet
V70a +1458Why this score
Source V70a Advan A10 Reviews found online 73 53 -
67
Comfort
V70a +1552Why this score
Source V70a Advan A10 Reviews found online 64 34 -
56
Treadwear
V70a +551Why this score
Source V70a Advan A10 Reviews found online 50 41 -
76
Handling
V70a +2947Why this score
Source V70a Advan A10 Reviews found online 76 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho V70a | Yokohama Advan A10 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 55 |
| Dry | 78 | 60 |
| Wet | 72 | 58 |
| Comfort | 67 | 52 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 51 |
| Handling | 76 | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
70
/ 100
V70a
55
/ 100
Advan A10
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A V70a
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and track performance
- Rapid warm-up time compared to competitors
- Strong stability and stiff sidewall construction
Cons
- Rapid tread wear rate
- Difficult to mount due to stiff sidewalls
- Limited longevity for daily driving
Tire B Advan A10
Pros
- Exceptional dry weather traction and road-holding capabilities
- High level of responsiveness and handling precision
- Strong performance in warm, dry climates
Cons
- Extremely short tread life with many reports of failure under 15,000 miles
- High levels of cabin noise, particularly at speeds exceeding 50-65 mph
- Poor performance and lack of confidence in wet, snowy, or icy conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho V70a | B · Yokohama Advan A10 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 5 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
70
/ 100
Kumho V70a
55
/ 100
Yokohama Advan A10
Winner: Kumho V70a — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho V70a scores 76 vs 47 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho V70a scores 78 vs 60 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho V70a scores 67 vs 52 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho V70a scores 72 vs 58 on wet.
Tire A · Kumho V70a
Tire B · Yokohama Advan A10
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.