Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 28 reviews
Kumho WinterCraft WP72 vs Syron Everest 1 plus — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 28 + 2 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: WinterCraft WP72 70, Everest 1 plus 71.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 70 · 1 test Owners 72 · 2 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2020 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test (noise)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
Everest 1 plus +570Why this score
Source WinterCraft WP72 Everest 1 plus Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 66 Reviews found online 63 74 WinterCraft WP72: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 65
Everest 1 plus: 60% × 66.4 + 40% × 74.4 = 70
No road tests of dry for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
74
Wet
WinterCraft WP72 +272Why this score
Source WinterCraft WP72 Everest 1 plus Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 73 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 76 75 WinterCraft WP72: 60% × 73.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 74
Everest 1 plus: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 74.6 = 72
No road tests of wet for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
74
Snow
WinterCraft WP72 +272Why this score
Source WinterCraft WP72 Everest 1 plus Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 76 ≈ 71 (est.) WinterCraft WP72: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.6 = 74
Everest 1 plus: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 71.2 (est.) = 72
No road tests of snow for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No owner ratings of snow for Everest 1 plus. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
66
Comfort
Everest 1 plus +470Why this score
Source WinterCraft WP72 Everest 1 plus Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 65 71 WinterCraft WP72: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 65 = 66
Everest 1 plus: 40% × 69.1 (est.) + 60% × 71 = 70
No road tests of comfort for WinterCraft WP72 or Everest 1 plus. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Noise
Everest 1 plus +672Why this score
Source WinterCraft WP72 Everest 1 plus Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 64 ≈ 66 (est.) WinterCraft WP72: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 66
Everest 1 plus: 60% × 76 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 72
No road tests of noise for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Everest 1 plus. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
70
Treadwear
WinterCraft WP72 +367Why this score
Source WinterCraft WP72 Everest 1 plus Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 73 67 WinterCraft WP72: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 70
Everest 1 plus: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Everest 1 plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
66
Handling (owners)
Everest 1 plus +672Why this score
Source WinterCraft WP72 Everest 1 plus Reviews found online 66 72 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison49Why this score
Source WinterCraft WP72 Everest 1 plus Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 49
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho WinterCraft WP72 | Syron Everest 1 plus |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 71 |
| Dry | 65 | 70 |
| Wet | 74 | 72 |
| Snow | 74 | 72 |
| Comfort | 66 | 70 |
| Noise | 66 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 66 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 49 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
WinterCraft WP72
Everest 1 plus
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | WinterCraft WP72 | Everest 1 plus | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/2 2025 AutoView Winter Tire Test R19 | #9/9 2020 Auto Bild Allrad Studless Winter Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A WinterCraft WP72
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in snow, slush, and deep snow conditions
- Great value and budget-friendly pricing compared to tier-one premium brands
- Surprisingly low noise levels and high comfort for a winter tire
Cons
- Some users reported vague high-speed handling or a 'jelly' sidewall feel at speeds over 50-60 mph
- A few mentions of increased noise compared to standard all-season tires
- Potential for flat-spotting due to nylon cord construction, making balancing difficult for some
Tire B Everest 1 plus
Pros
- Strong grip in dry conditions
- Effective performance in sub-zero temperatures
- High level of ride comfort
Cons
- Prone to wheel spin in wet weather
- Lack of rim protection
- Not recommended for high-performance or heavy vehicles
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho WinterCraft WP72 | B · Syron Everest 1 plus |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 25 | 39 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 21″ | 13″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 2 | 2 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho WinterCraft WP72
Syron Everest 1 plus
Too close to call: Kumho WinterCraft WP72 and Syron Everest 1 plus are within 2 points overall. Kumho WinterCraft WP72 is stronger on treadwear. Syron Everest 1 plus is stronger on noise, handling and dry. Syron Everest 1 plus rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 2 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Syron Everest 1 plus scores 72 vs 66 on noise.
Syron Everest 1 plus scores 72 vs 66 on handling.
Syron Everest 1 plus scores 70 vs 65 on dry.
Syron Everest 1 plus scores 70 vs 66 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
WinterCraft WP72 or Everest 1 plus?
Which is better in the wet, WinterCraft WP72 or Everest 1 plus?
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 72 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, WinterCraft WP72 or Everest 1 plus?
Syron Everest 1 plus, 70 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, WinterCraft WP72 or Everest 1 plus?
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 72 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, WinterCraft WP72 or Everest 1 plus?
Syron Everest 1 plus, 72 vs 66 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, WinterCraft WP72 or Everest 1 plus?
Syron Everest 1 plus, 70 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, WinterCraft WP72 or Everest 1 plus?
Kumho WinterCraft WP72, 70 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology