Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 28 reviews
Kumho WinterCraft WP72 vs Toyo Snowprox S954 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 7 road tests and 28 + 5 owner reviews. How we score
WinterCraft WP72 is ahead, 70–63
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 62 · 7 tests Owners 64 · 5 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 14 in 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
Snowprox S954 +772Why this score
Source WinterCraft WP72 Snowprox S954 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 78 Reviews found online 64 64 WinterCraft WP72: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.9 = 65
Snowprox S954: 60% × 77.8 + 40% × 64.1 = 72
No road tests of dry for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
74
Wet
WinterCraft WP72 +668Why this score
Source WinterCraft WP72 Snowprox S954 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests ≈ 74 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 76 63 WinterCraft WP72: 60% × 73.5 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 74
Snowprox S954: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 62.9 = 68
No road tests of wet for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
74
Snow
WinterCraft WP72 +2648Why this score
Source WinterCraft WP72 Snowprox S954 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests ≈ 73 (est.) 36 Reviews found online 76 67 WinterCraft WP72: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 76.1 = 74
Snowprox S954: 60% × 36 + 40% × 67.1 = 48
No road tests of snow for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
67
Comfort
WinterCraft WP72 +463Why this score
Source WinterCraft WP72 Snowprox S954 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 58 Reviews found online 66 66 WinterCraft WP72: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 65.6 = 67
Snowprox S954: 40% × 57.8 + 60% × 65.7 = 63
No road tests of comfort for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Noise
Snowprox S954 +369Why this score
Source WinterCraft WP72 Snowprox S954 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 65 ≈ 67 (est.) WinterCraft WP72: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 66
Snowprox S954: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 69
No road tests of noise for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Snowprox S954. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
70
Treadwear
WinterCraft WP72 +763Why this score
Source WinterCraft WP72 Snowprox S954 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 73 61 WinterCraft WP72: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 70
Snowprox S954: 60% × 64.4 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Snowprox S954. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
66
Handling (owners)
Level66Why this score
Source WinterCraft WP72 Snowprox S954 Reviews found online 66 66 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison58Why this score
Source WinterCraft WP72 Snowprox S954 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests – 58
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho WinterCraft WP72 | Toyo Snowprox S954 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 63 |
| Dry | 65 | 72 |
| Wet | 74 | 68 |
| Snow | 74 | 48 |
| Comfort | 67 | 63 |
| Noise | 66 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 66 | 66 |
| Efficiency | – | 58 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
WinterCraft WP72
Snowprox S954
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | WinterCraft WP72 | Snowprox S954 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/2 2025 AutoView Winter Tire Test R19 | #11/10 2025 Autobild Winter Tire Test R18 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A WinterCraft WP72
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in snow, slush, and deep snow conditions
- Great value and budget-friendly pricing compared to tier-one premium brands
- Surprisingly low noise levels and high comfort for a winter tire
Cons
- Some users reported vague high-speed handling or a 'jelly' sidewall feel at speeds over 50-60 mph
- A few mentions of increased noise compared to standard all-season tires
- Potential for flat-spotting due to nylon cord construction, making balancing difficult for some
Tire B Snowprox S954
Pros
- Excellent value for the price point
- Strong dry road handling and grip
- Predictable steering feedback near the limit
Cons
- Inconsistent wet weather traction
- Reported understeer on roundabouts and wet surfaces
- Mixed reliability compared to premium winter tire alternatives
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho WinterCraft WP72 | B · Toyo Snowprox S954 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 25 | 52 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 21″ | 16″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 11 | 11 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho WinterCraft WP72
Toyo Snowprox S954
Winner: Kumho WinterCraft WP72 — better snow, treadwear and wet. Pick the Toyo Snowprox S954 if dry and noise matter most to you.
Kumho WinterCraft WP72 scores 74 vs 48 on snow.
Kumho WinterCraft WP72 scores 70 vs 63 on treadwear.
Toyo Snowprox S954 scores 72 vs 65 on dry.
Kumho WinterCraft WP72 scores 74 vs 68 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
WinterCraft WP72 or Snowprox S954?
Which is better in the wet, WinterCraft WP72 or Snowprox S954?
Kumho WinterCraft WP72, 74 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, WinterCraft WP72 or Snowprox S954?
Toyo Snowprox S954, 72 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, WinterCraft WP72 or Snowprox S954?
Kumho WinterCraft WP72, 74 vs 48 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, WinterCraft WP72 or Snowprox S954?
Toyo Snowprox S954, 69 vs 66 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, WinterCraft WP72 or Snowprox S954?
Kumho WinterCraft WP72, 67 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, WinterCraft WP72 or Snowprox S954?
Kumho WinterCraft WP72, 70 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology