Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 28 reviews
Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Kumho WinterCraft WP72 vs Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 28 + 44 owner reviews. How we score
Wintrac 4 Extreme leads, 73–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 44 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
Wintrac 4 Extreme +772Why this score
Source WinterCraft WP72 Wintrac 4 Extreme Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 63 75 WinterCraft WP72: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 63.4 = 65
Wintrac 4 Extreme: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 75 = 72
No road tests of dry for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Wintrac 4 Extreme. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
73
Wet
Wintrac 4 Extreme +578Why this score
Source WinterCraft WP72 Wintrac 4 Extreme Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 76 (est.) Reviews found online 74 80 WinterCraft WP72: 60% × 72 (est.) + 40% × 73.8 = 73
Wintrac 4 Extreme: 60% × 75.7 (est.) + 40% × 80.4 = 78
No road tests of wet for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Wintrac 4 Extreme. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
72
Snow
WinterCraft WP72 +270Why this score
Source WinterCraft WP72 Wintrac 4 Extreme Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 73 70 WinterCraft WP72: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 73.4 = 72
Wintrac 4 Extreme: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 70
No road tests of snow for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Wintrac 4 Extreme. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
68
Comfort
Wintrac 4 Extreme +573Why this score
Source WinterCraft WP72 Wintrac 4 Extreme Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 66 77 WinterCraft WP72: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 68
Wintrac 4 Extreme: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 73
No road tests of comfort for WinterCraft WP72 or Wintrac 4 Extreme. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source WinterCraft WP72 Wintrac 4 Extreme Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 66 – WinterCraft WP72: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 67
No road tests of noise for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Treadwear
Level69Why this score
Source WinterCraft WP72 Wintrac 4 Extreme Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 71 71 WinterCraft WP72: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 69
Wintrac 4 Extreme: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Wintrac 4 Extreme. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
65
Handling (owners)
Wintrac 4 Extreme +1075Why this score
Source WinterCraft WP72 Wintrac 4 Extreme Reviews found online 65 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho WinterCraft WP72 | Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 73 |
| Dry | 65 | 72 |
| Wet | 73 | 78 |
| Snow | 72 | 70 |
| Comfort | 68 | 73 |
| Noise | 67 | – |
| Treadwear | 69 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
WinterCraft WP72
Wintrac 4 Extreme
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | WinterCraft WP72 | Wintrac 4 Extreme | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/2 2025 AutoView Winter Tire Test R19 | #7/8 2011 Auto Bild 4x4 Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A WinterCraft WP72
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in snow, slush, and deep snow conditions
- Great value and budget-friendly pricing compared to tier-one premium brands
- Surprisingly low noise levels and high comfort for a winter tire
Cons
- Some users reported vague high-speed handling or a 'jelly' sidewall feel at speeds over 50-60 mph
- A few mentions of increased noise compared to standard all-season tires
- Potential for flat-spotting due to nylon cord construction, making balancing difficult for some
Tire B Wintrac 4 Extreme
Pros
- Exceptional traction and stability in deep snow and on ice
- Strong performance in cold, wet, and greasy road conditions
- Impressive tread longevity and durability
Cons
- Reduced handling precision and 'squidgy' feel in temperatures above 13°C
- Initial stiffness or harsh ride quality during the break-in period
- Increased tread wear if used consistently in warm summer weather
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho WinterCraft WP72 | B · Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 25 | — |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 21″ | — |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho WinterCraft WP72
Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme
Narrow edge: Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme — better handling, dry and wet. Where the Kumho WinterCraft WP72 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme scores 75 vs 65 on handling.
Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme scores 72 vs 65 on dry.
Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme scores 78 vs 73 on wet.
Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme scores 73 vs 68 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
WinterCraft WP72 or Wintrac 4 Extreme?
Which is better in the wet, WinterCraft WP72 or Wintrac 4 Extreme?
Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme, 78 vs 73 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, WinterCraft WP72 or Wintrac 4 Extreme?
Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme, 72 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, WinterCraft WP72 or Wintrac 4 Extreme?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 70 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, WinterCraft WP72 or Wintrac 4 Extreme?
Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme, 73 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, WinterCraft WP72 or Wintrac 4 Extreme?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 69 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology