Tests 62 · 1 test Owners 64 · 3 reviews
Kumho WinterCraft WS71 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 33 road tests and 3 + 21,761 owner reviews. How we score
CrossClimate 2 is ahead, 88–65
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 87 · 33 tests Owners 87 · 21,761 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 35 in 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout (dry braking)
“PSA: Michelin CrossClimate 2 - They make noise. Recently purchased Michelin Cross Climate 2s for my MachE from Costco. I received a fairly decent price (1,000 for 4) vs local competitors (1,400 for 4). I've seen a lot of people say how great they are, and I thought I'd give them a shot. They look nice. They definitely give it a more 'off-road' look. They also come with a 65,000 mile warranty which they said applied to EVs as well, which is nice as well. They feel great driving. I appreciate their excellent traction and feel secure on turns. I haven't been able to test them on snow yet, but they perform well on wet roads. That being said. They definitely make noise. They make a little at lower, city speeds (~35 mph). They also make a really weird noise at highway speeds (~70 mph+). Neither is so loud or annoying that a little radio can't cover up the sound. Overall, I am very pleased with the tire and the price I received. However, be warned, they do make noise. EDIT: I originally posted this is the Ford Mustang MachE forum and forgot to say that I put them on my MachE. The MachE, being an EV, may be why the noise is more noticeable for me versus others. Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
CrossClimate 2 +3095Why this score
Source WinterCraft WS71 CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 31 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 99 Reviews found online 63 88 WinterCraft WS71: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 65
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 99.2 + 40% × 88.4 = 95
No road tests of dry for WinterCraft WS71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
70
Wet
CrossClimate 2 +1787Why this score
Source WinterCraft WS71 CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 31 tests 73 83 Reviews found online 65 92 WinterCraft WS71: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 65.3 = 70
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 83.2 + 40% × 91.8 = 87
-
58
Snow
CrossClimate 2 +3391Why this score
Source WinterCraft WS71 CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 27 tests 51 99 Reviews found online 69 79 WinterCraft WS71: 60% × 51.1 + 40% × 68.7 = 58
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 98.5 + 40% × 78.8 = 91
-
65
Comfort
CrossClimate 2 +1378Why this score
Source WinterCraft WS71 CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 63 86 WinterCraft WS71: 40% × 67.5 (est.) + 60% × 62.6 = 65
CrossClimate 2: 40% × 67 + 60% × 86.1 = 78
No road tests of comfort for WinterCraft WS71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison79Why this score
Source WinterCraft WS71 CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 20 tests – 77 Reviews found online – 83 CrossClimate 2: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 82.6 = 79
-
62
Treadwear
CrossClimate 2 +2284Why this score
Source WinterCraft WS71 CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 81 Reviews found online 60 88 WinterCraft WS71: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 62
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 81.2 + 40% × 88 = 84
No road tests of treadwear for WinterCraft WS71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
64
Handling (owners)
CrossClimate 2 +1882Why this score
Source WinterCraft WS71 CrossClimate 2 Reviews found online 64 82 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison90Why this score
Source WinterCraft WS71 CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 23 tests – 90
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho WinterCraft WS71 | Michelin CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 88 |
| Dry | 65 | 95 |
| Wet | 70 | 87 |
| Snow | 58 | 91 |
| Comfort | 65 | 78 |
| Noise | – | 79 |
| Treadwear | 62 | 84 |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | 82 |
| Efficiency | – | 90 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
WinterCraft WS71
CrossClimate 2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | WinterCraft WS71 | CrossClimate 2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wet Braking | Wet | 85% #21/48 · 2020 Winter Tyre Market Overview - 52 Tyre Braking Test | 92% #9/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 | – | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 87% #29/30 · 2020 Winter Tyre Market Overview - 52 Tyre Braking Test | 97% #3/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #28/48 2020 Winter Tyre Market Overview - 52 Tyre Braking Test | #2/6 2026 Wybór Kierowców Winter Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A WinterCraft WS71
Pros
- Excellent traction in snow and slush
- Strong performance in extreme cold temperatures
- Good value for the price point
Cons
- Reports of sidewall cracking or splitting after multiple seasons
- Functional limitations typical of dedicated winter compounds on dry pavement
- Potential for premature structural degradation
Tire B CrossClimate 2
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in snow, slush, and winter weather conditions
- Strong braking and handling performance on dry and wet pavement
- Long-lasting tread wear and durability
Cons
- Higher initial purchase price
- Slight negative impact on fuel economy / EV range for some drivers
- Potential for increased road noise or harshness as the tires wear down
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Kumho WinterCraft WS71
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Most posters praise the CrossClimate 2 for strong snow, wet and hydroplaning grip, a quiet ride after break-in, and good tread life. Those who criticise it cite a small to moderate MPG or range loss, noise or a harsh ride for some owners, mixed wear reports, and a high price. A vocal minority calls it overhyped or unnecessary where snow is rare, and says rivals such as the Nokian WRG5 or Michelin Defender 2 suit some drivers better.
“New CrossClimate 2 tires almost stranded my family. Massive efficiency drop on Model Y. Just a heads-up for anyone swapping to Michelin CrossClimate 2s. Put a set on my Model Y about 3 weeks ago from Discount Tire and just did a road trip from Denver to Taos, NM with my wife and two toddlers. We charged up to 90% at the Pueblo Supercharger, and the Tesla app estimated we would arrive in Taos with 15% battery remaining. Well, the new tire efficiency hit is incredibly real. The range dropped so fast that we were tracking to hit 0% and had to make an emergency Type 2 charging stop on the way just to make sure we didn't get stranded with the kids in the car. I’m now seriously thinking about taking advantage of Discount Tire's return policy and going back to the OEM Continental ProContact RX. Has anyone else faced similar problems or massive efficiency drops when switching to the CC2s? Does the range eventually get better after a break-in period, or should I just cut my losses and swap back to the Continentals? I need something reliable for road trips with the family, so I'd love to hear your suggestions and experiences!”
“Review of Michelin CrossClimate 2 tires. I recently purchased Michelin CrossClimate 2 tires for my wife’s 2018 CRV EX-L FWD and I have to say they are pretty stellar. Thus far we have put at least 2000 miles on them to include a 14 hour road trip. Excellent traction on wet roads and far superior to the Goodyear Assurance we had before. We have driven through a couple significant downpours and these tires have confidence on wet roads. As for the alleged noise complaints, I think they’re very quiet compared to the old tires. Rolling resistance/ MPG; no changes and I would have happily sacrificed a couple MPG for good traction in FWD vehicle. As for snow, I can’t say and we live in Texas anyway. Price; I spent about $1000 total for four tires and installs at Costco. That was with tax. Overall, I highly recommend these tires thus far.”
“Michelin CrossClimate2 efficiency surprisingly good! Just put in a new set of Michelin CrossClimate2s to go along with a move from LA to New England. I was a bit worried about the mileage/range hit but figured the safety in the winter outweighed it. I'm pleasantly surprised! On an all-highway trip from Boston to New Jersey, gas MPG was a steady 42 mpgs and I got about 45 miles on the battery, although I drive like a grandma at the posted speed limits so I think I was close to 44 mpg/45 EV miles on the old OEM tires. Around town in suburbia in good weather I'm still running between 4.0-5.0 miles/kWh. I estimate, at worst, a 5% drop in efficiency. Pretty good considering the Michelins feel so much stickier!”
Based on 765 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho WinterCraft WS71 | B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 68 | 92 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 15″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 640 B A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 9 | 9 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho WinterCraft WS71
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 — better snow, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Kumho WinterCraft WS71 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 91 vs 58 on snow.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 95 vs 65 on dry.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 84 vs 62 on treadwear.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 82 vs 64 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
WinterCraft WS71 or CrossClimate 2?
Which is better in the wet, WinterCraft WS71 or CrossClimate 2?
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 87 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, WinterCraft WS71 or CrossClimate 2?
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 95 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, WinterCraft WS71 or CrossClimate 2?
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 91 vs 58 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, WinterCraft WS71 or CrossClimate 2?
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 78 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, WinterCraft WS71 or CrossClimate 2?
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 84 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology