Head-to-head Updated

Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 14 road tests and 9 + 18 owner reviews. How we score

G Fit 4S leads, 75–71 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Laufenn G Fit 4S
Tire ALaufenn

G Fit 4S

All Season

± 6

Tests 71 · 6 tests Owners 80 · 9 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test (wet circle)

Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2
± 6

Tests 74 · 14 tests Owners 69 · 18 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test (wet braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    Cinturato All Season SF2 +8
    80
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SCinturato All Season SF2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 13 tests6590
    Reviews found online8166
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–186%94%

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 65.3 + 40% × 81.1 = 72

    Cinturato All Season SF2: 60% × 89.7 + 40% × 66.3 = 80

  2. 85

    Wet

    G Fit 4S +6
    79
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SCinturato All Season SF2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 13 tests8684
    Reviews found online8572
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–091%89%

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 85.7 + 40% × 84.8 = 85

    Cinturato All Season SF2: 60% × 83.6 + 40% × 71.9 = 79

  3. 77

    Snow

    G Fit 4S +18
    59
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SCinturato All Season SF2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 11 tests7756
    Reviews found online7765

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 77.1 = 77

    Cinturato All Season SF2: 60% × 56 + 40% × 64.5 = 59

  4. 75

    Comfort

    Cinturato All Season SF2 +3
    78
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SCinturato All Season SF2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests7289
    Reviews found online7871

    G Fit 4S: 40% × 71.5 + 60% × 77.9 = 75

    Cinturato All Season SF2: 40% × 88.9 + 60% × 70.6 = 78

  5. 38

    Noise

    Cinturato All Season SF2 +44
    82
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SCinturato All Season SF2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 10 tests1893
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 18.4 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 38

    Cinturato All Season SF2: 60% × 92.6 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 82

    No owner ratings of noise for G Fit 4S or Cinturato All Season SF2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 75

    Treadwear

    G Fit 4S +16
    59
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SCinturato All Season SF2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests7251
    Reviews found online7970

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 78.5 = 75

    Cinturato All Season SF2: 60% × 50.9 + 40% × 70.2 = 59

  7. 79

    Handling (owners)

    G Fit 4S +14
    65
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SCinturato All Season SF2
    Reviews found online7965
  8. 47

    Efficiency

    Cinturato All Season SF2 +17
    64
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SCinturato All Season SF2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 9 tests4764
Scores at a glance
Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryLaufenn G Fit 4SPirelli Cinturato All Season SF2
Relative Score 75 71
Dry 72 80
Wet 85 79
Snow 77 59
Comfort 75 78
Noise 38 82
Treadwear 75 59
Handling (owners) 79 65
Efficiency 47 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

G Fit 4S

± 6

Cinturato All Season SF2

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Laufenn G Fit 4S finished ahead 0 times and Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2 1 times.

DisciplineCategoryG Fit 4SCinturato All Season SF2ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 86% 94% −7.3 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 All Season Tyre Market Overview · 225/50 R17
Wet Braking Wet 91% 89% +1.3 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 All Season Tyre Market Overview · 225/50 R17
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #21/32 #14/32 – 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 All Season Tyre Market Overview · 225/50 R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A G Fit 4S

Pros

  • Excellent grip and performance in wet conditions and heavy snow
  • High value for money as an affordable budget tire with Hankook backing
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Slightly noticeable tread noise at higher speeds above 100 km/h
  • Isolated quality control concerns regarding sidewall bumps on new tires
All owner themes in the G Fit 4S review

Tire B Cinturato All Season SF2

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
  • Strong dry grip and dependable performance in mild conditions

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can cause a jelly-like feeling and vague handling at higher speeds or on bends
  • Lack of steering precision and reactivity compared to dedicated summer tires
  • Mixed performance in severe winter conditions like heavy snow and ice
All owner themes in the Cinturato All Season SF2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Laufenn G Fit 4S B · Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available7964
Rim diameters13″ – 20″15″ – 21″
UTQG640 B A—
Sizes in common5454

Which one should you actually buy?

Laufenn G Fit 4S

Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2

Narrow edge: Laufenn G Fit 4S — better snow, treadwear and handling. Pick the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2 if noise, efficiency and dry matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2 scores 82 vs 38 on noise.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 77 vs 59 on snow.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2 scores 64 vs 47 on efficiency.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 75 vs 59 on treadwear.

Tire A · Laufenn G Fit 4S
Tire B · Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

G Fit 4S or Cinturato All Season SF2?

Which is better in the wet, G Fit 4S or Cinturato All Season SF2?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 85 vs 79 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, G Fit 4S or Cinturato All Season SF2?

Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2, 80 vs 72 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, G Fit 4S or Cinturato All Season SF2?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 77 vs 59 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, G Fit 4S or Cinturato All Season SF2?

Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2, 82 vs 38 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, G Fit 4S or Cinturato All Season SF2?

Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2, 78 vs 75 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, G Fit 4S or Cinturato All Season SF2?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 75 vs 59 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, G Fit 4S or Cinturato All Season SF2?

Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2, 64 vs 47 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology